Citizens United Against CPS (DCYF) Abuse

Determined To Fight An Injustice (Introduction)

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

My first experience with CPS was in December of 2006
when my husband's daughters accused us falsely of neglect and abuse. I will be brief here in this entry with regard to this part of the story and will limit myself only to saying that it was all part of a personal vendetta, because they have never wanted their father to be married to me (or to anyone for that matter) and viewed my eldest son as a rival (before my other son was born) for their father's attention. Believe it or not these are not teenagers but women in their 30's who simply never grew up emotionally.
At least on that occasion there was an investigation
and my son was not taken from us as the charges were found to be false. I did not realize at the time that I was part of the lucky few who had at least gotten some partial justice on that occasion.
I had heard about children taken away from parents
unjustly but in my naivety did not think that it could happen to me, especially as the first time our son was not taken. We then moved to Spain and did not tell them, which resulted in my husband's daughters calling multiple government agencies and taking our kids away in Spain under bogus accusations and without a prior investigation.
What has happened to I and my husband since then seems to defy reality. It is something one would expect to see in a movie. To acquaint yourselves with the beginnings of this situation read the blog in my art gallery (link provided below).

My Art Gallery Blog

I wanted to start this site not only for myself but to
help make others aware of the horrendous injustices
that are occurring in our society. I have researched
CPA abuses and have found some real horror stories.
It is important to understand that injustice thrives
only when it is allowed to.

CPA Actions Unconstitutional!

CPA (which where I live in Rhode Island also goes by
the name of DCYF) engages in behavior that can rightly be deemed as unconstitutional.
If you doubt this, compare their actions with the
10 Amendments of the Bill of Rights.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Combating False Perceptions

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Perception is a very ambiguous concept, and anything that is ambiguous is subject to error.
Perceptions can be true or false but they almost always have the power to influence.
I am really sick of the people that work in these agencies pretending to be concerned over children whose lives they are ruining. They have the audacity to pretend that they care more for the unfortunate children who fall into their grasp than their parents who in most cases have sacrificed everything for their children. I am disgusted by the empty rhetoric and the seemingly "professional" conclusions that
are in reality only a well ornamented jargon consisting merely of lies. To deny that this agency
(like many other bureaucratic agencies) is mostly
driven by economic goals is to not be acquainted
with what is going on (do some research on your own).
To deny that this agency in it's very inefficiency can
be exploited by unscrupulous individuals for personal motives such as vendettas is to prepare
yourself to probably become a potential victim.
The reality is that there are many cases in which
children have been removed without adequate investigation and parents' rights have been shamefully violated. Perhaps one of the most
offensive characteristics of this agency is the sheer
arrogance which it shows to the victimized parents.
That lack of respect for human dignity or for human feelings that with such ease brushes aside the very
legitimate concerns of the parents who are truly
(apart from their children) the only ones affected
by the incompetent decisions that this agency is so famous for making.

Does this agency really look out for the welfare of
children? Go to the link below and read stories
of people who have been victimized by CPA.

Why CPS Exists

My "Abused Boys"

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

My children were removed from our home on December of 2008 in Spain. One of the bogus accusations that was used to justify the unjustifiable act of taking our children away with no PRIOR INVESTIGATION! (Gestapo Tactics at it's best) was the accusation that our house was messy (BIG LIE!!!).
Since I know that this seems to be a favorite charge
of social services (though I think that the name anti-social services would be more appropriate) I have included the link of a very informative web page that deals precisely with this issue, just in case this disturbing trend in our society may touch any of you
(G-D Forbid!).

"Where Is The Law About A Messy House?"

These accusations came from my husband's daughters who had also stated in several taunting e-mails written to me that I lived in filth. What makes it all the more ironic is that they have always had a notorious reputation for having messy houses.
The reality is that if having a messy house were a sound basis for tearing a child away from his parents,
then my husband's daughters should have had their children taken from them long ago as their houses as far as I have heard and seen prior to this situation
have been nearly persistent in that condition.
However, I have proof a plenty that I lived in cleanliness with my children, but influence and what's convenient seems to be more important to this agency.
Among the accusations that have been made of us, I am being passed off as an unstable parent,
and they have said that I and my husband are emotionally, socially, and mentally incapable of
taking care of our children.
Well, I would like to clarify some obviously overlooked things. First, I have way more hands on
parenting experience than my accusers for the simple fact that ever since my husband's daughters have had their kids (G-D Bless those kids
as they are innocent in this matter) their mommy,
my husband, and other people have practically raised them, whereas I have always taken care of both of my boys all by myself. Also I have taken the
initiative to educate myself on child care and nutrition which is not frequently seen in most women nowadays. Emotionally I have always been strong.
When I was pregnant with my second son, even though I was constantly in danger of dying from a
dangerous blood clot, I would tend to the house and take care of my eldest son. I even put myself at risk refusing certain easily administered oral medications in order to safeguard my then unborn baby's health. Instead I preferred to inject myself
the medicine because it was the safest alternative for my child. It is because I recognize the importance of a stable home that I have done everything that I can to preserve my marriage despite the constant outside interference that would have made so many women just give up. Enduring hardship in order to guarantee that one's children will not grow up in a broken home is not a sign of emotional instability.
As for my mental capacities, I have survived situations (such as being homeless, etc. see my blog to understand better) that even people that are fine would not have been able to withstand, and even under the most oppressive circumstances I have tried to remain as positive as possible, given my situation, and have even used my hardships to engage in worthwhile pursuits and do productive things such as writing books, composing music, and
working on my online businesses which I began long before this whole stupid situation began.
In the past I tutored children for several years and so
have experience teaching children, and always my boys had tons of books and educational DVDs.
As for socially, what is the basis of being truly sociable than to be courteous and considerate with others? Traits that my accusers do not possess.
The basis of ensuring that children function well in society are ethics, morals. Without that a person may seem to be popular and very talkative but they will truly not be able to function in society when it comes
to personal relationships. Why do you think that many celebrities never have happy lives or long lasting relationships? Are they really sociable because they are popular? Are we confusing one thing with the other? Sociable is simply to be able to
relate in an effective way with other people within society, and if someone does not possess morals they
cannot do that.
My kids have never been abused neither by I nor my
husband who is also very doting on them. We are decent G-D Fearing Bible believing people who have never had any type of vices.I was teaching my kids to pray after each meal and had plans for teaching them the Bible. If my children have suffered any harm it has been from the desperate attempts (directly and indirectly) of their half-sisters to wreck my marriage, trying to ensure that my boys grow up in a broken home just as they themselves did, because of their own mother's unwillingness to commit herself then to her family.
The abuse accusations are so ridiculous, things have been twisted, many lies fabricated with something that has a grain of truth to make the whole thing appear true. Here I have slide shows that show some of the huge stack of photos that I have (as well as videos) proving the life that we had.

My Sons' Bogus Diagnosises!

Tuesday, November 24,2009

If you read my blog you will see that since I was in Spain months ago I have been stating that there has been an attempt to label my eldest son as retarded.
How did I know this? Elementary, or actually rudimentary logic. When my husband's daughters accused us in December 2006 part of the charge was that my eldest son was "autistic" and had some sort of developmental delay. My son's half-sisters had stated that he could not walk (this was when he was nearly two) and the DCYF worker put him to walk which he did quite well.
December 2008 (it seems that my husband's daughters prefer December, it being the holiday season) when our kids were taken away from us in Spain we were handed a paper which said among the other ridiculous charges the same "autistic" claim.
Coincidence? Not very likely!
Shortly before this the mother of my husband's daughters who was in our US apartment with them and played a hand in this, sent me an e-mail taunting me by saying that my son was a special-ed kid. Many of the comments in the taunting e-mails that I have received from my husband's daughters are strikingly similar to the accusations that have made against us.
In Spain the social worker (bad Juana!) told us that
our sons were in fine health (even when we complained about them being sick for two months).
We were never told about them being found in deplorable conditions although she did mention that my son did not walk to which I and my husband responded that that was a lie, while I recalled that all this was a more gruesome reincarnation of the 2006 attempts to take away our son. Except that this time we had two boys so it was double the suffering and double the worry. Believe it or not they gave us zero information in Spain and treated us like animals. When we came here after our kids were deported in May 2009 to prevent a trial in Spain,
we were homeless and received little sympathy from
the DCYF workers, whose willingness to participate in the deportation contributed to our then homeless status.We endured months without seeing our kids,
when I saw my boys finally in September 2009 my eldest boy had forgotten all that he once knew (which I assure you was a lot). Also everytime that I have seen them since we arrived in July of this year (with the exception of one visit) they have been sick. My children are placed with the very half-sister that is
envious of them and who has always wanted to label since 2006 my child as retarded.Though there is sufficient evidence to confirm their true motives for doing what they have done, and there is the false accusation that she made in 2006, the DCYF workers just don't seem to care. They have no qualms about my children residing in the home of someone that has never been interested in behaving like a sister to them and who wants I and my husband to divorce.
They even dare to proclaim that it's for their wellbeing! And that they are thriving!
Perhaps these people need to consult a dictionary,
or perhaps they just do not (as usual) know what the heck they are saying, because they are basing their "learned" assessment on how my kids were with someone else in Spain, and can never know how they were with us to make such an outrageous statement.
I do not think that a kid who knew as much as mine and now cannot even write his name, and who has
been almost consistently sick since I have been seeing him is thriving. That have even denied the petition that I and my husband made that they be fed an organic diet. But according to them the ultimate
proof that my eldest son is thriving is that he is potty trained! Wow! He's been nearly a year out or our care as he was taken away at 3 and a half. My husband was trying to train him already and many kids learn the potty from 3-4 years. What's the big deal, he would have learned anyhow with us if he would not have been taken. But now they are trying to use that fact that he was still in diapers when he was taken, to stregthen their claim that my son has a disability!
And they even have used it to suggest neglect!
Gee! I did not know that if your three year old is still
in diapers that makes you guilty of neglect!
What about the fact that my son knew the alphabet in three different languages, could write several words in English and even in Hebrew, could sing well,
knew all his shapes in English and Spanish, knew how to count from 1-20 in three languages,play tunes on the piano, and could draw superbly for his age! All this he could do at the age of three. Why can't he do all those things anymore? How can anyone with an ounce of common sense call that thriving?!
The worse however was yet to come. As incredible as it may seem it was only yesterday that I was able to
know what the exact charges against us were. I had never seen so many lies adorning a single page!
My husband and I were in utter shock!
My son was diagnosed with severe global developmental delay as well as reactive attachment
disorder, and the icing on top is a severe speech disorder. Of course my youngest boy just couldn't stay behind, so he got slammed with a speech delay label as well, they say that though he's two years old he has the vocabulary of a twelve month old. Gee! most twelve months old that I have known don't talk really that much at all. My husband walked and talked much later than our boys and nobody tried to ruin his life with a label.
The reality is that most children start trying to say words from 18 months up, though there are always early talkers.
According to this medical article most kids at two
are still using unintelligible speech of their own,

Speech development

I've heard my two year old say several words, so where is the supposed speech delay?

With regard to my eldest son having reactive attachment disorder I decided to do some research on it, as most of us most likely have never even heard
of this "disorder". I soon found out why.
According to what I have learned it is a severely rare disorder so hardly anyone has heard of it. Yet my
son was one of the few that hit the unfortunate jackpot. The following info I obtained from the internet:

RAD is one of the least researched and most poorly understood disorders in the DSM. There is little systematic epidemiologic information on RAD, its course is not well established and it appears difficult to diagnose accurately.^[10] There is a lack of clarity about the presentation of attachment disorders over the age of five years and difficulty in distinguishing between aspects of attachment disorders, disorganized attachment or the consequences of maltreatment.There is as yet no universally accepted diagnostic protocol for reactive attachment disorder.

Intrigued and angry all at once I decided to check out some more.

The link that I provide explains what this disorder is. Reaction Attachment Disorder.

A child who has this disorder cannot establish loving relationships with others, they cannot bond. That does not sound like my son who used to like to be hugged and kissed, and who always had a flirtatious smile. Who valued always our attention and always sought our approval when he learned something new.

So let us compare the symptoms to my son:
You can find them in this link symptoms
but I have also pasted them here for everyone's convenience.

Signs and symptoms in babies may include:

Withdrawn, sad and listless appearance
Failure to smile
Lack of the normal tendency to follow others in the room with the eyes
Failure to reach out when picked up
No interest in playing peekaboo or other interactive games
No interest in playing with toys
Engaging in self-soothing behavior, such as rocking or self-stroking
Calm when left alone

Withdrawing from others
Avoiding or dismissing comforting comments or gestures
Acting aggressively toward peers
Watching others closely but not engaging in social interaction
Failing to ask for support or assistance
Obvious and consistent awkwardness or discomfort
Masking feelings of anger or distress
Alcohol or drug abuse in adolescents

As you can see, my eldest son in this and in many other pictures does not appear to be sad or depressed.

As for being interested in play not only was Wencito (while he was with us) always curious about learning new things, he was super mischievous and very active. In the picture above he's 11 months old and he would play pranks on me by pulling all the bed sheets from our bed. He always thought that it was hilarious. Actually if you observe closely you will
see that he his grinning behind that pacifier of his.
At 18 months he would jump out of his crib something that would worry me greatly since he was so agile. I have no reason to lie about these things. I can prove methodically everything that I say,
look at the picture below:

Actually I and my husband can say in all honesty that none of the symptoms of this disorder apply to Wencito's personality
while he was with us. He loved to be hugged and kissed, was always lovable, liked to share. He greatly valued our approval and always sought praise when he learned something new. Obviously he valued his relationship with us. He would also like to play with
Galileo and make him laugh, a video of which is in my blog. Of course when he was taken from us it's all a different story as he and his younger brother were being abused for a two month period during which they truly were in a deplorable condition with ugly worn out clothes, bruises and cuts every week, my youngest boy with an ear infection, and both of them seriously sick with a virus for two months straight despite our constant complaints.

This section is being added on Monday,
November 30th 2009 (it is a continuation of this entry started earlier)

It is not fair to unnecessarily expose a child to traumatic circumstances (these are children that prior to this had never been apart from us a single day in all their lives) and then use his very normal reactions to those traumatic situations created by the incompetence of others, to put a false label on him in order to cover up their mistake.
My poor son has suffered enough already, to now have his life ruined by a stupid false label.

I will now delve into my son's other bogus diagnosises. These diagnosises were made (according to this confidential report) at the PANDA clinic in RI
on May 15, 2009 (days after they were deported from Spain against our will). First I feel that it is important to consider several points.
Before I make those points I will place a link to
a PANDA clinic pdf document that will back up
what I say.

PANDA CLINIC pdf document

1) PANDA clinic is supposed to evaluate children
under age three when they are supposedly victims of abuse and neglect, then section A-3 on page 2 of the document says that DCYF may refer inactive children and children under three who are not victims in an abuse and neglect investigation if it is thought that it is in the child's interest (more like
in commissions interest I would say).

My son at the time of the examination was four, and
was taken from me in Spain without an
investigation. Is not that an irregularity?

2) Section B-2 on page 2 of the document says that
parent or guardian consent is required.

We never gave such consent. As a matter of fact we
never even knew that they were seen by PANDA clinic
or of these bogus diagnosises until a week ago!
We never gave consent for our children to be with my husband's daughter, quite the contrary my husband protested against it. Is not that an irregularity?

3) In section B-2-b on page 2 of the document, it says
that in situations where the parents is absent and
the relative who has the child is not the legal
guardian, DCYF provides the consent.

But surely this applies to children who were seized
within the US, not to children whose parents are not
present because they are still in another country from where they were deported against their parents'
will. This "evaluation" took place only a day after my
sons arrived in the US. The last time that we had seen
our sons in Spain during the weekly visit was on
May 13, 2009. Since all involved in this injustice knew of our financial situation (which was caused by the agencies called by my husband's daughters cutting off a good chunk of our social security money) it seems as if this "evaluation" was done with such lightening speed in order to not give us time to arrive and give or deny our consent.Is not this an irregularity?

4) In section A-2 found on pg 2 of the document,
a parent may accept or decline Early Intervention
services,even after having first accepted them.

How could I and my husband decline "services"
that we were not aware of nor understood?
It was only on September that the new social worker
briefly mentioned that our youngest son was in
Early Intervention. When I inquired more on it, she
did not explain what it really meant, nor asked for
our consent, nor gave us the option of refusing such
"services". On September she said that our eldest
boy had just had an evaluation and that she still
did not have the results. According to this
confidential report the only evaluation mentioned
was on May 15, 2009. How could she not have the
results when we spoke with her in September?!
We also were not told that a child gets referred to
Early Intervention when according to the
"evaluators" they have a single established
condition for a disability!
In our ignorance we thought that it was like some
type of headstart program.

Furthermore DCYF violated the law when it interfered
and accepted children that had been removed from their home in another country where their parents already had a lawyer and where the case was already in the Spanish courts. They aided in the obstruction of justice by helping to prevent us from having a trial in Spain.

In this report it states that at the time of evaluation
my youngest son Galileo had the language development of a 12 month old (I already refuted that stupid allegation above in this entry), and had
nutritional deficiencies and eating difficulties.

The fact that they state that my son had nutritional
deficiencies at the time of evaluation (only a day after arriving from Spain) proves that they had suffered abuse at someone else's hands and that that abuse was recent. This evaluation was done six months after they were taken from us. If they would have been receiving good care during that period of time they would not have been in that condition.
This coincides perfectly with all the denunciations and complaints that I and my husband made in Spain with regard to our sons' health. In some of the
denunciations I complain about my sons' poor
nutrition and their weakened immune system, and this was before I even knew that they were going to be deported. It seems clear (just as I have stated in my blog) that the actions of whoever had them are being
thrown on us in order to protect the real abuser.
It is a sickening mix and match game of grains of
truths that are badly placed out of their real time of
occurrence with many fabricated lies.
The eating difficulties do not exist, again we see here the twisting of circumstances that are common in children of that age to make something appear out
of the ordinary. At the time of the "evaluation" my youngest boy had barely turned two (in April). Not
many two years olds can eat well by themselves, and
my boys are picky for certain types of foods. If they
don't like something they will not eat it no matter what. But of course since this case is so flimsy they need to exploit anything that comes their way.
An example of this is that in their desperation to
show that my boys have a "delay" they say in the report that my boys cannot even drink water.
Wow! What ultimate proof!
It just happens that there is a rational explanation
for that, my boys hate water!
And it' s true that they got that lack of preference
for water from me. As a kid I hated water, and even as an adult I still don't like it very much. My boys are
the same, since they were months old I tried to accustomed them to drinking water at least occassionally (though many pediatricians caution against giving too much water to babies because of the lack of nutrients). Still I thought that on a hot summer's day it is good for hydration. Nevertheless despite my numerous attempts they always showed their dislike for water. They only drank formula or juice, so what could I do? I was not going to shove water down their throats. If they don't like it I stop giving it to them. Obviously they could drink other things because if not they would have been severly dehydrated.
My eldest son who was four at the time was said to
have the speech development of an 18 month old.
I refute that false accusation. I admit my son was never very talkative, but he could learn to sing songs with lyrics in different languages, ocassionally did speak in short sentences (when he felt like it) and knew many words in several languages. I don't think that most 18 month olds can do that.
When these evaluations were done my sons had gone through a lot of trauma. My son even in a nurturing
environment was never very talkative to begin with,
though he talked way more than he does now, so I can just imagine how being in the environment that
he was placed in would have made him even less talkative. Also there seem to be some conflicting dates. In the last court hearing I went to the judge said that there was a report of an "evaluation" done in July of 2009 at Hasbro hospital. Now in this report
(which I recieved after the hearing) the "evaluation" was done on May 15, 2009 at Panda clinic, so I am basing what I say on this report, even though we have been lied to so often. According to the report my eldest son was still in diapers and was a toe walker.
When Wencito was taken at the age of three and a half my husband was trying to train him. There are many kids (especially boys who have a tendency to learn the potty later) who get potty-trained from ages 3-4, so it is not as highly unusual as they are so conveniently making it seem. Since I saw that he was
so intelligent academically and knew that many kids get potty trained from ages 3-4 I did not feel that there was cause for concern. Now if at the time of the "evaluation" my boy was still in diapers it must be because the person who had him in Spain for the last six months did not train him, so why are we being used as scapegoats? When they say toe walker I don't
even know what they are referring to. My boy never took ballet. He walked well,he could run when he wanted to, he was very agile, would jump out of his crib, he even learned to climb over the tall gate that I would put in his room's door so that he would not go to the kitchen at night. This is obviously the reincarnation of his half-sisters' statement in the 2006 accusation that he could not walk (blah, blah).
The few weeks that we got to walk as a family in Spain, he never gave us any trouble walking in the street. When we would visit them in Spain they would come running to us, so no walking problems then either.
According to this bogus report my eldest boy has a
history of nutritional problems, dental caries (the person who typed the report put the Spanish word for cavities, interesting!), and immunization delay.
Once again the Machiavellian tongue twists everything. My kids had no cavities when they were taken from us, the nutrional problems which they put in plural form to blow everything out of proportion is really only a hereditary tendency to
not tolerate very well cow's milk in liquid form (though goat's milk has no effect on him). This tendency he inherited from my husband who in turn inherited it from his father. You cannot accuse a parent for negligent abuse for something that is hereditary! I knew what I could give my son and what
I could not give him, and never had problems since he was six months old. If the foolish social workers in Spain would have listened to me when I told them what to feed him, instead of treating me as if I did not know anything, they would not have comed out with that stupid milk allergy diagnosis in Spain.
The immunization delay is more than explained in my blog, and is not the result of negligence but of being a well-educated, well informed, Bible believing parent. I challenge anyone to do some independent research on vaccines to see how harmful they are for long-term health and how they are linked to the abortion industry.

Article Written By A Doctor : Why You Should Avoid Vaccines (Do the research for yourselves)

Articles Written By Doctor On Vaccines

Another Vaccine Article By Doctor

Are We Kidding Ourselves? Article By Doctor

Many people on the internet have sadly denied the link between abortion and vaccines either for
financial motives or because they are frightened
of such a possibility.
Now I'm not Catholic, but this is a well researched Catholic site that speaks of the much denied link.
I feel that it may prove useful to people of all faiths.

Embryo Derived Vaccines

The last issue that I wish to address in this entry, is that of my eldest son also having "severe (let's put that
word there for dramatic flair!) global developmental disorder". Another little heard of disorder for my poor
son to bear as a label! So what is this condition?
I have provided a link below, but I will also paste it here for everyone's convenience.

What Is Global Developmental Delay?

A Global Developmental Delay is a general term used to describe a condition that occurs during the developmental period of a child's life (birth to age 18). It is usually characterized by lower intellectual functioning and is accompanied by significant limitations in communication, self-care, home living, vocational, academic skills, leisure, health and safety).

Global Developmental Delay has many different causes which ultimately affect the functioning of the central nervous system (Trauma to the central nervous system, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, genetic disorders , metabolic disorders, etc).

Common signs may include:

delayed acquisition of milestones: the child is late in sitting up, crawling, walking

limited reasoning or conceptual abilities

fine/gross motor difficulties

poor social skills/judgment

aggressive behaviour as a coping skill

communication problems

Surely these people must be joking!

Lower intellectual functioning?!!! My Wencito?!!!
I have videos of him forming letters at age two!
My eldest boy crawled around eight months, walked well around fourteen months, a bit late but my husband walked late as well and the following link below explains how each child is different. It does not automatically mean that they have a disorder.

Milestones:walking

I have videos and photos to prove what I say.
I do not think that Wencito ever had limited reasoning abilities, as a matter of fact he sometimes was too
smart for his own good, such as figuring out how to
open external child-proof locks, which gave me the extra burden of having to insert internal child-proof locks. Before G-D, I am not lying when I say that he figured out how to reach something that was way out of his reach by placing a light plastic table that he had inside his crib and then standing on it. This he did before he was three. His ability to reason and to plan when he wanted something always amazed me.

I have shown in photos that I have placed and in videos
on my blog that my son had no motor skills problems.
My son was always friendly with people despite the fact that he has never been very talkative. When we used to go to stores he would "flirt" with the cashiers by smiling at them, and the cashiers always would ask for him. So I do not think that that implies social skills problems.
Also once again I say that it is important to bear in mind
that a child can be very talkative and yet not know how to treat others which would indicate problems with socializing.

With regard to aggressiveness my son has always been friendly with people and is not at all violent. Ironically
my husband's daughters were the ones who used to beat each other up when they were small with punches and kicks. My son occasionally however would have mild tantrums, as is normal with all toddlers. He would never beat up anyone, just cry and throw his toys on
the floor. This is normal toddler behavior. The link below will enlighten those who think differently:

Toddler Tears & Tantrums

When I visited my sons in Spain (and my husband is a witness to that) my eldest boy never showed any aggressive behavior, nor in the visits that we have had
with him here in the US. Even during the two month period that he was being abused in Spain, he seemed withdrawn, not his usual happy self, but not aggressive in anyway. Though my son never showed this behavior,
it should be taken into account that a poor diet rich in
refined sugars can affect a toddler's mood (this is explained in the link above).

The fact that he is not very talkative does not necessarily indicate communication problems.
He was able to communicate his basic needs. He did
occasionally speak in short sentences when he felt like it. I will say that my son has never talked much, but
I do not believe that he has a speech delay for the following reason:
My son started saying his first words when he was
around 18 months. If you check the speech development link that I put at the beginning of this lengthy entry you will see that that still falls within normal range. If he would have had a genuine speech delay he would have said his first words much later.
When you think of it Einstein said his first word at two.

Read Article that mentions Einstein's Late Talking

Book Written By Psychologist On Bright Children
WhoTalk Late

As time went he went on acquiring vocabulary in
more than one language, it's just that he would use
that vocabulary sparingly, and only when he felt like it.
I never understood why knowing the vocabulary that he did he would not use that vocabulary more often.
But there were times when he would speak in short sentences, and he showed signs of being a brilliant child from the age of two. And now his half-sisters who have
been trying to put a label on him since 2006, are taking
advantage of this tendency of his and have further worsened the situation by creating a non-nurturing
where he talks even less, in order to be able to say that he is retarded.

In case you are asking yourselves why would two grown women in their 30's with good jobs and their own families be jealous of a toddler, the answer is
that this happens not because of what he really is (an innocent little boy) but because of what he represents in their minds (someone who has taken their place and who is a rival for their father's affection). The sad fact is that they never grew up emotionally, they got used to having my husband pamper them, devote himself only to them, so as a result they are very possessive of him and don't want to see him married with anyone. This caused problems also in a previous relationship that my husband had. When my sons were born they felt displaced,the fact that my husband would brag about what Wencito could do when he started learning things only worsened the situation. They feel that their father has abandoned them and that I and my sons are to blame for this. They do not realize that it is their own behavior that has caused the rift. So here we have the root of their jealousy and hatred.

Shame On ACLU!

Monday, November 30, 2009

Last Wednesday November 25, I and my husband
called the ACLU of RI, to see if we could explain our
situation and get more info on how to defend our
rights. It had come to my knowledge (and I had even
included a link of it on this site) that the ACLU on
other occasions has defended those that have been
victimized by the actions of CPA/DCYF, so I was
bitterly disappointed when a woman picked up the
phone and told me that the ACLU no longer sees people to consult cases, that they only accept submissions in writing, and that even then there is no guarantee that they will help. So much for the freedom defenders! They also have written on their site the motto "Because Freedom Cannot Defend Itself",
well, they are not doing a good job of defending it when they no longer even bother to speak to people
who wish to voice their concerns.
I am so enraged by this lack of concern for citizens'
grievances that I am asking those who are concerned
about social justice, to please call these people at the
following number and protest their new policy of
not seeing people who have been victimized and who are seeking orientation.
Their number is (401) 831-7171.
Even if they decide not get involved they should at least listen to the person!

On No! My Kids Are Sick Again! Memoirs Of A Sad Visit.

Monday, November 30, 2009

I saw my sons last Wednesday November 25th for the
first time in nearly a month. Our visit two weeks prior to that did not take place because it fell on veterans day. Last visit prior to this one the kids had not been sick which to me was surprising, but somehow I knew that that beneficial state could not last for long. This visit, sick again! Unfortunately everything was back to usual. The sad reality is that in the period that my sons have been away from me (nearly a year) they have been sick more times than in all their lives with me. My eldest boy with us got sick only once (aged two months) and the youngest never had gotten sick prior to their abduction. I used to give them organic food and kid supplements and they simply did not get sick as their immune systems were very strong.
First in Spain, during the period that they were being physically and emotionally abused they were sick two months straight with a virus (I am not kidding!), plus my youngest boy got an ear infection.
Ever since we arrived in the US in July every time that I have seen my sons (with the exception
of that one visit) they have been sick.
So if my husband and I see our sons twice a month
(biweekly) and on those two visits they are sick, it is only logical to conclude that they have been sick for the most part of the month.
So the question is, why is DCYF not charging my
husband's daughters with neglect? The fact is that
if they would have gotten sick so many times while in my care this agency would be having a field day,
twisting everything to their advantage. As it is they
never got sick with us, and yet we have been slandered with false accusations stating that our kids had illnesses such as belly button infections,etc. when they were taken from us.
Yet according to DCYF my kids are thriving!!!
My eldest son has forgotten everything he knew (something that I will discuss more in detail later in this entry), my youngest son who is two and a half does not even recognize his own parents, and they are constantly sick, plus they are in an environment
where I know (given the past behavior of my husband's daughters towards them) that they are not receiving any love, except perhaps from my husband's granddaughters. So I still fail to see how this could be called thriving! Unless a new definition has been invented for the word that is still as of yet unknown to me, I thought that thriving meant being in a nurturing environment that promotes growth and well being in all aspects, physical as well as intellectually, and where a child feels loved.
How does this fit in to my sons' present situation?
How could someone who merely sees my sons as pawns in a personal vendetta be expected to provide such an environment?
I am not pleased at all with my sons' present state.
My youngest boy Galileo does not even know us anymore, which in turn makes it very difficult for us to interact with him or engage in activities because
he will not stay with us for long when we try to do something with him. This visit Galileo's hands were filthy, and Wencito had a mild bad odor on the back of his neck when I kissed him.
I am also concerned with the fact that this situation
has delayed my youngest son's progress in learning. When my eldest son was Galileo's age he already knew the alphabet, could spell words, and could count up to ten in three languages, but unfortunately since Galileo (who is also a highly intelligent boy) was taken from me at the age of one and a half he did not have the opportunity to be in an environment where learning is encouraged and rewarded, and as a result his academic progress has suffered. When Galileo was taken from me he could count up to three in Spanish and called me "Mama" and my husband "Dada". Now it is only a memory.
I am quite aware that a good many people think of learning as something that should only be undertaken obligatorily and only for the final goal of monetary gain, and so the overwhelming number of people who share this point of view, view someone as myself who am addicted to learning, and who believes in instilling that love of learning early on in children(so that they become fervent lifelong learners) as a demanding mother. Well, I'm sorry, but I don't believe in unconsciously teaching children the concept of "learning is boring, reading is reserved as a punishment, school is a drag, and fun is anything not related to a book, and smart people are dull."
That is what 90% of people teach their children without realizing it. My eldest boy never thought of
learning as boring prior to this situation, he was in love with learning because I had instilled it in him
all his life. The activities that we did together were always learning activities, and he did not mind it one bit. Almost all his toys were educational ones, all his
DVDs were educational ones, so to him learning was part of play. He did not have the notion that unfortunately many parents instill in their children,
that play and learning are separate things, one fun
and the other boring.When you look at it the purpose
of play should be to learn. Play for it's own sake, just to kill time,and with no purpose, teaches a child to engage in meaningless activities when they are older that truly result in a waste of time as well as potential. But now my son has been robbed even of that, and DCYF is seeking to suppress my efforts to help my son recover what was such a vital and beneficial part of his personality.
For nearly a year after our children were taken from us with no prior investigation, we were kept conveniently in the dark with regard to the exact charges for which we were accused with neglect and child abuse. One week ago when I finally saw the "confidential report" (Wow! Top secret material!
More like top-secret lies!) I read the following:
"The older child Wencis has been observed to be overwhelmed by his mother wanting him to "perform" and show CST what he was able to do,such as writing his name, and drawing pictures. Mother reacts negatively upon Wencis not being able to perform all of the tasks she requests of him. CST
(will leave out name to protect anonimity) is currently working with mom on age approriate play
with each of the boys and redirecting parents when needed during visits."

As usual DCYF is very skilled at twisting things to
make them appear quite different from what the
reality is. The fact is that now they are trying to prevent me from engaging in learning activities with my gifted child who they are trying to pass off as
retarded or delayed. First I never reacted negatively
towards my son when I realized that he had forgotten something that at one time he knew well. This did not only consist of writing and drawing, but I would recite the French,Spanish,and English alphabets which he used to know at one time and would love to recite by himself , and would count from 1-20 in English,Spanish, and French, as well as play the piano with him (I would take his toy keyboard).
When he could no longer do something that he once did, I would not talk to him in a negative way, but would comment with a disappointed tone of voice to the worker supervising the visit or to my husband about how my son had forgotten everything he once knew. It is irrational to not expect me to feel disappointment at realizing the extent of the
developmental harm done to my son by this whole traumatic experience. But the way that they twist
everything they make it sound as if I would put down my son, or yell or do something very bad when he did not do something. Actually the only ones who are behaving in a negative manner are they, if they view
my wanting to teach my son (which is my parental right) with hostility. Quite the contrary, by helping my son regain that which was once a joy to him, I am
trying to reverse a negative situation, so my actions
are actually positive. Anyone who helps to suppress
a child's potential, be it for personal motives (such as
is the case of my husband's daughters),for monetary gain or incompetence (such as the DCYF agency) is
the one who is overwhelming a child with
destructive tendencies that does not allow him to truly thrive.
In an age when there is so little parental involvement
in children's education (resulting in an undereducated populace) I should not be chastised
for actually worrying about my son's education, for
recognizing his abilities, and for wanting to protect and nurture them.
When one carefully analyzes this situation, the only
rational explanation for DCYF to feel somehow threatened by I teaching my son is that they are perhaps worried that my son will recover some of his
academic learning and thus they will not be able to make their false labels stick.
For what other reason would they be worried about I
counting with my son, or teaching him to play a tune on the keyboard,etc. ?
Well believe it or not, civil liberties have eroded to such an extent that someone has the authority to
tell me that I cannot teach my own son, who was taken from me illegally without an investigation in another country, on the accusation of someone whose true motives are well known, and who has a record of filing a false accusation in 2006!
With regard to age appropriate play there really is no such thing, for play is according to the child's individual abilities rather than their physical age.
At the age of two and half my child could use plastic
letters to form words, something which other children of that age cannot do because they do not know their letters. I myself recall as a child playing with educational toys that were for much older children. Furthermore I doubt that someone who probably does not even have children and who never knew my son as he truly was, can instruct me, his mother, on what games my son can play, or has the ability to play.
I sadly reflect on how my eldest boy has changed, he no longer seems focused on learning and I worry about what may be going on behind closed doors, as the social worker only visits the home where he is at once a month. Despite his brilliance he was never a
very talkative child, but yet he was always singing,
reciting things such as shapes, numbers, he would ocassionally talk to me in short sentences, now he
does not speak at all in visits. Now he can only count in English from 1-10 something that he knew how to do in three languages when he was two. My husband's
daughter for some strange reason never wanted to teach her daughters Spanish, and my son seems to have forgotten the Spanish he knew, so I hope that
he does not emerge from this whole experience as a monolingual.
Galileo is in such a crucial stage for language development and due to this situation probably does not know any Spanish. The words that I have heard him say are in English.
Also I am concerned that Galileo being the youngest and more easily influenced by example might pick
up certain negative behaviors that he might observe in his grown half-sisters. Prior to him being taken he was always willing to share with Wencito, but now I
have noticed that he is unwilling to share any toy that he has with his brother.

Before finishing this entry I would like to once again make some very important points with regard to my kids being always sick.
If my husband's daughter having so much help from this agency cannot keep my kids consistently healthy
(and being a nurse to top it off), how dare they criticize me when I taking care of my kids by myself had them healthy! Where is the knowledge of basic hygiene (such as simple hand washing) and nutrition?
Why are my kids not being fed organic food as I and my husband have insisted time and again? Why are my kids not being given natural kiddie supplements?
My husband even called his daughters and told them that he wants our boys to eat organic food, so if they earn good salaries plus get a stipend from DCYF
why can't they comply? Two toddlers do not eat that much, as their portions are smaller than that of an older child. Perhaps there is the proof of their real intentions. The reason that they do not do it is because they know that it would make me happy to know that my kids at least are eating well.
And the whole purpose of this situation is to give
us (me especially) heartache. By doing things to my sons that they know that I would not like to be done,
they make themselves feel better at knowing that I suffer. How wonderfully mature!

I've Joined The Stolen By The State Social Network

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

This site will be my main site to combat the abuses
that have occurred to me and to others.
However I have just today joined the
"Stolen By The State Network ".
This is a network that allows people who have lost
children to CPS (CPA/DCYF) agencies, parents who
have had their rights terminated, and people in
general who are fighting CPS, to tell their stories,
contact one another, and mobilize themselves
through information and awareness.
This affects everyone, as anyone can fall
victim to this agency. The reality is that anyone
who does not like you, or who bears a grudge
against you, CAN exploit these gullible agencies
to make your life hell. So this is everyone's problem.
You can go to my "Stolen By The State" page at the
link below:

Stolen By The State : Cibeles Gonzalez

Doing More Research To Increase Awareness

Wednesday December 2, 2009

I have been studying cases that might be similar
to mine or even worst. However, though I more than
understand their justifiable anger, I am not fond
of sites that use foul language or make violent
insinuations, as I do not feel that it helps them in
the long run. The best way to obtain justice is
through peaceful and civilized civil disobedience
in accordance with Biblical ethics.
I have seen so many sites of people that have been
victimized that there is no way that I could
possibly put them all here. So I will limit myself
to combating my own personal injustice and to
provide information that might help others in
a similar situation. Only rarely will I focus on
the personal stories of others.
One also must be wary in the Internet ,as there will
always be those who are agitators and who fan
the flames of a fire that is already too real, and thus
seek to ill advise those who are genuinely suffering
from injustices to develop attitudes that are not at
all beneficial.
Still, I have read some genuine horror stories.
Awareness has it's uses, but in the end it is G-D
who sees all and knows all who will decide.
I have been told by well meaning people whose
opinion I greatly value that what I write in my
search to combat this injustice may be used
against me. However I have come to the
realization (especially after reading that hideous
report) that regardless of whether I do anything
or not, whatever I do or say WILL be twisted to
cover up the injustice done to us. So if this is a case
of "damned if you and damned if you don't" I might
as well engage in at least the attempt of defending
my family's integrity and make a stand for justice.
When misrepresentation and lies are the norm
becoming a mute is definitely not the answer.
That fact that an accusation report could be kept
confidential for nearly a year speaks volumes about
these agencies' lack of desire to see I and my
husband be able to defend ourselves. They knew
that they were lying (for the most part) or at best
in some sections of the report twisting little grains
of half-truths that are so grossly misrepresented
that they develop into something that is totally alien to the actual reality.
I truly and honestly marvel at people's evil! How
could people waste the limited time that they have on this earth hurting others, instead of enjoying the things that they have and leaving a valid reason
behind for their existence once their gone.
If it's a question of just having been deceived by my husband's daughters (which I do believe was the
case in the beginning) why not tell us from the start
what the exact accusations were so that we could mount a defense on our behalf? Why so much secrecy
and lack of due process?
Obviously what started out as naivety on their part
has turned into a cover-up campaign in order to
escape accountability for a very bad mistake.
And this cover-up was also re-played in Spain when
we were denied a right to a trial WHERE the
children were taken from us.
Trials should take place where the events took place.
Our kids were taken from us in Spain. It's true that
it was done through the intervention of the US consul
in Mallorca, Spain, who had constant contact with
my husband's daughters, but the seizure without
prior investigation occurred in Spain nevertheless.
So why am I being tried in the US for something that
supposedly happened in Spain?! Does that even make
sense? Should RI DCYF even be involved in this?
Aren't they stepping over their boundaries in the
literal sense?
The sad reality is that RI DCYF helped to prevent a
trial in Spain where the judge would most likely
have forced the Consell of Mallorca to open up
their fraudulent records of this sham case and
tell us who the heck was abusing our children for
two months! Now we are told that in a U.S. trial
we will never know who had them, so that TRUE child abuser is now protected by my children's deportation to the U.S. What a wonderful system, prosecute innocent parents and protect real child abusers!
As if that were bad enough,I have already through
my research noticed patterns which are familiar to
our case in the information obtained.

The following sites will enlighten those who need it:

Reunification Fraud

Falsification Of Evidence

Inspector delivers seething report on child services report

Read this article (provided in the link below) where
some of the dirty tricks used by CPA (which I also
pasted below) are exposed.

The article reads:Common practices of CPS agencies include: Not investigating before removing a child, taking children into state custody based upon here say, taking children from school without a "Protective Custody Warrant", manipulating the Court system in criminal cases against the parents who are improperly prosecuted, obstruction of justice, fabricating documents, omitting facts, coercing minors, deception, isolating children from their parents, breaking bonds, traumatizing children, negative therapy, and placing children in unsafe foster homes. Children are not being evaluated right away by a doctor or seeing child advocates such as CASA. Social workers have been known to go on "witch hunts" against parents, influencing doctors, and ruining parents medical files. Many CPS agencies work in collusion with therapists who give parents false "mental conditions" which is used against them in court. Family court is "secret" so there is no jury or fair trial. Children are being heard in Judges chambers so many testimonies cannot be documented on Court record.

Read article at CPS Corruption and Human Trafficking Exposed in San Luis Obispo Wed, 09/17/2008

Added This Link On Feb 28th 2010 Of A Copy Of The Article Above Which Is No Longer Available At That Specific Page

If this proves too shocking for you, there is still the
icing on the cake (a very sour icing it is too).

What I am going to discuss next may sound like a
bad joke, but it is all too frighteningly real.
Innocent children's drawings are being "analyzed"
by "experts" in order to be used as proof of child
abuse against innocent parents or as proof that
the children are sick. The "expert" adds quite
forcibly, his delusional analysis on the child's
art work.

Illustrated Examples of Questionable Expert
Testimony in Child Custody and Abuse Cases

I think that it is the psychologists who come to these findings that must be mentally ill, if they view a child's innocent drawing through such a malicious perspective. Even in the world of art there is never always a uniform notion of what an art work represents. Art analysts always have diverse interpretations unless the artist himself states a specific meaning that is represented in the work of art. But here we have children telling these
"experts" that the drawing does not represent that, yet they for whatever reason wish to persist in placing their own delusional interpretations of the child's drawings in order to falsely accuse the parent. It's even amazing that this would be accepted in a court! Yep! Kangaroo courts at their best, that's for sure!

According to a psychologist who obviously appears to do divinations with drawings (give me a drawing and
I'll tell you everything about you!) the little girl who
innocently drew this picture was sexually abused by her father! It did not matter that the little girl denied
that her father had abused her, it did not matter that
she explained what the drawing meant. No!
The psychologist was the "expert" so what she says must be right. And so with the conviction of her
fictitious infallibility she accused an innocent man,
and brought grief as well as guilt to a small child, who most likely felt as if it were her fault that daddy was in trouble.

The Social Worker: Hope You Never Have To Meet Her!

The irony is that in Spain we did not even get a visit like this.They just came on December 19th 2008 at 10 in the morning and within 25 minutes had taken our kids with warrants that were taken out in court by the US Consul in Mallorca. There was never any investigation before the children were taken, although we did have an idea of what my husband's daughters were trying to do, from friends in the U.S. and because of some e-mail comments that I had received from my husband's daughters and their mom that were of a taunting nature (both directly as well as indirectly).

I Worry About My Gifted Boy!

In light of my sons' new labels stating that they have disorders, I have reason to worry about what will be next. How far will the personal vendetta of their half-sisters go? How far will this agency go to cover-up? The report talks about my eldest son starting to see a psychologist! Will medication follow next? Will my little boy's life be destroyed to heal the irrational insecurities of his grown half-sisters? To bring profit to the pharmaceutical industry? Is this an isolated case? I fear not! I have included a trailer of a very revealing film that I hope will educate others about this disturbing trend. Please understand that this can happen to anyone's child. All that is required is someone who wants to hurt you making a phone call. These things may seem surreal but they are really happening!

"Woe to the wicked! It will go badly with him, For what he deserves will be done to him." Isaiah 3:11

"He who sows wickedness reaps trouble, and the rod
of his fury will be destroyed." Proverbs 22:8

"HE will repay them for their sins and destroy them for their wickedness; the LORD our G-D will destroy them." Psalm 94:23

"But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea." Matthew 18:6

There IS Trauma , But Who Really Caused It?

When CPA agencies state that a child has been traumatized they are not necessarily always lying.
The problem however is that they will not admit that
in 90% of the cases they themselves are the cause of that child's trauma. I have seen first hand how this agency can destroy a family and leave them permanently scarred . I do not know if my sons will ever overcome the harm that they have suffered both
physically, emotionally, and intellectually since they were taken from us. My eldest son as I have already stated so many times has been brainwashed not to
learn and is in an intellectually dead environment, talking less than ever now, and with disorder labels
to boot.My youngest son does not even know us anymore and is reluctant to share things, a trait
which he did not possess before. He was very easy going. They have been nearly constantly sick, and then there was the two month period in Spain when
they were being physically and emotionally abused.
Wencito, who being older was more aware of things
seemed withdrawn and sad, not his usual happy,
smiling self. It is important to state that in the last few weeks prior to deportation from Spain their
condition did improve and Wencito was not so withdrawn, so I believe that most likely they were
given to another person in the last few weeks that they were in Spain, probably due to our constant
complaints and even denunciations that we made
to the police in Palma. Add to that the fact that our
children had a very close relationship with us
because they had never been apart from us a single day of their lives before this situation, and you can
understand the deep level of trauma that they have endured. What marvels me is that CPA/DCYF, knowing the true motives of my sons' half-sisters for
doing what they have done, does not seem to care, have told me to my face that that is my opinion when it is a well documented fact, and are quite willing to expose my boys to more unecessary trauma by placing them in the unloving home of the person that started this whole mess and who has never loved them, and who does not as a result desire their true
well-being. What has not occurred to them is that
it is more than likely (and I have valid reason to suspect this) that my husband's daughters are abusing my boys with Parent Alienation which is a
little known type of abuse in which a person conditions a child and does their best to destroy
their bond with his parents. It does not always
have to be because of a nasty divorce, it can be a relative, or even a friend. I have enclosed a video
below of this type of conditioning. Our youngest
son does not even know us anymore, and G-D only
knows what she might be telling both of my sons
behind closed doors about me, as the social worker only visits that house once a month, and she
has more than enough opportunity to be alone with
them. Though our eldest boy does interact with us on some level, he does not eagerly seek us out as he used to. Even in Spain when they saw us they would come to us running and smiling, wanting us to pick them up. Here it is totally different. I have stated to others before that I am concerned about what my husband's
eldest daughter might be telling our boys about us. This is no fantasy on my part, as no parent
would ever contemplate imagining such hateful
things if they were not possible. The reason why I think that this is so possible is because in the past she has spoken negative things about me to her small daughters. On two occasions, when my husband and
I took them out on trips they had a slip of tongue
and mentioned what their mother had said about me.
So I can just imagine what she could possibly be saying to my sons since they are now living with her.
Also their half-sisters are creating a very negative image of I and my husband (of I especially) which unfortunately is being reinforced by the economic hardships that they have also created for us, which leaves us with very little income, even to buy clothes to look more presentable because we have so many debts as a result of our money getting cut off throughout this situation. Yet that seems to be their expertise (they and the agencies) create situations,then twist those very situations to create false perceptions. We are
living in a small studio and do not even have money to buy furniture. My night table is a suitcase. All
doors to economic progress seem to close for us here in Rhode Island. Practically all our money goes on debts and necessities, plus we have debts created by them in Spain, and all our possesions are still there
in a port. We were even two weeks homeless when we first got here, a period during which I wrote a poetry book documenting my experiences titled "A Homeless Voice In Verse".
I include a copy of the book in miniature form
below the Parent Alienation video.
I have said time and again to the deaf ears of DCYF,
how can my children's well being be in the home of
someone who desires for them to grow up in a broken home? How would they feel knowing that their children are in the home of someone that hates them? Then my husband's daughters do their little
act and spread about me that I am the one who has an irrational hatred towards them when I never meddled in their lives or hurt their children, nor tried to break their marriages.
Many times I was alone with their daughters and I always took good care of them despite the fact that
I knew that their mothers hated me. So why do they have to do so much harm to my innocent boys who are their half-brothers? If there would be a real investigation of what happened to us in Spain (not that there has been any unfortunately) it would be plain that this is all a personal vendetta.

A Homeless Voice In Verse -

Trying To Understand What Goes On In A Bizarre World!

Monday, December 28, 2009

As a yearlong victim of multiple human rights violations I have become accustomed to legal loopholes, being ignored, seeing myself be mocked.
and the general irrationality of several strange occurrences. I had my share of them in Spain as well. I always try to understand the causes of things, and always believe in analyzing everything
systematically. When I encounter something which appears to be strange and which I fail to understand
I approach the situation with the eyes of a detective.
When dealing with injustice there are bound to be
irregularities, for injustice is never rational and neither are the procedures that accompany it.
I know that I and my husband have a hearing pending, and I know that both DCYF and the
lawyers know our P.O. Box address as it is in our records. Though we were expecting some communication (be it though phone or mail) from the lawyer to inform us of the hearing, as has been done in the past, I and my husband are quite puzzled as to why a pink card was sent to our house this weekend, addressed only to me from Conventry with reference to court papers. Now, Conventry is in Kent County, and our case was transferred in September to Providence.

So I really do not understand why a card would be sent from a Conventry P.O. Box to our house when the case is in Providence, and they have our
P.O. Box address and telephone number, and I have not received any call from either lawyer or court.
This takes the inefficiency of the DCYF and the
kangaroo family court system to new heights.
Picture of card is shown below (I only covered personal info like my address).

So the number is not from the family court in Providence, and it is an unpublished cell phone number in Providence. One does not have to be a rocket scientist to know that that is not how court numbers are. I decided to look up the courts in Conventry, though I knew that it was irrelevant to my case. I found the number and address of the municipal court in Conventry and the probate court (see in pictures below). Neither addresses or numbers match the card number and address. If you see that I double check everything it is precisely because of my experiences
both in Spain and here since this whole stupid situation began. I and my husband have experienced so many irregularities and civil rights violations, and
so many bizarre things have happened to us that I think that it's best to just double check everything.
It would be irrational of me after all that I've experienced, and all the deceit that we have been
the victims of, to be naive and trusting.
Circumstances are what dictate if an attitude is
rational or not.

Surely there must be an explanation for this, as everything has a reason, I just don't know what it is.
If it would be from a court I think that it should have
both our names, a court address, and a published
fixed number.
Anyhow this is insignificant in comparison with all
the lies that have been spread about I and my husband, and the very real fact that DCYF (who is
manipulated by my husband's daughters) are desperate to use anything we do or say in order to
label us as crazy. What was written about us in their
fraudulent report is way more bizarre than any letter from an unexplainable source. We just have to keep ourselves focused on positive things (hard as that is in our situation) and patiently wait for G-D's Justice.

Tracing The Origin Of The Pink Card & Confronting A New Injustice!

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

In my last entry I was pondering on the origin of a
pink card that was sent to me during the weekend
with no information that identified the sender.
Why did I not call the number on the card right away?
Because of experiences that I have had in Spain as well as here, and because the card provided absolutely no information about who the sender was. No one in my situation who has experienced so many abuses and irregularities would call to give personal information without verifying who the sender is.
The lawyer had told us that he would notify us of the hearing date so I was not expecting any unidentified
person to carry out that task. I tracked the number
to an unpublished cell phone number, and the P.O. Box to an isolated rural town, it was only logical
for me to question the card's origin and to be skeptical as to it's authenticity.Furthermore the
card had no name to identify the sender and had an
illegible postmark.
Experiences at times shape our expectations, in Spain I recall receiving a bogus e-mail threatening to
destroy all my possessions that are in the Barcelona port if I did not call their number, the e-mail looked authentic with a logo and all.
I knew that it was another company name, so I called
the company that I knew has our possessions and was told that they had never sent such an e-mail and that my possessions were fine. Likewise I remembered receiving e-mail invites from a friend's e-mail, and later when I spoke with that friend she told me that she had never sent me any invites. These strange occurrences coupled with all the human rights violations that I have experienced and the lies that I have been a victim of have made me overly cautious of giving out any information without checking first. I also recalled being harassed on the
phone some months ago with offensive text messages,
some of the numbers when I tried to trace were unpublished numbers. So in general I do not believe
in giving any info to unpublished numbers unless I
already know the person who I'm calling. Though I finally did manage to verify the card's origins the
way in which that card was sent is still strange.
First I had to track the owner of the P.O. Box through the Internet. The 02816 post office refused to give me
any information as to who was the owner of the
P.O. Box so I had to search still more. I found out
that the P.O. Box belonged to an Ernest Legault, who
I found when I did more research was indeed a constable.
The number however was different from that of the card.

It does not seem very professional to me to send a card that looked the way that one did. Unfortunately as I have never been in a trial before, I do not have enough experience in judicial matters to know if procedures such as these are the norm, and I can assure you that many of the things that have occurred to I and my husband(both in Spain and here) are definitely out of the norm.
So once again experiences shape expectations.
When he told me that the court papers had to do with child support I did not understand.
I asked him why were papers being sent only in my name and not in my husband's when we were a married couple and are fighting together to get our kids back. He said he did not know.
In short I told this guy to bring me the court papers
to the central Cranston library. I signed four pages verifying that I had received the papers and he told me that the signature did not mean that I agreed with the papers, only that I have received them.
After he left I and my husband sat down to read the papers. What a shocker! It's so true that injustice
has a domino effect, one leading to another.
Read our blog and this site, and you think that nothing worst can happen to us, from being slandered, having our kids taken away, seeing our kids abused in Spain, seeing our kids being labeled
with false diagnoses here, having no peace in our
marriage thanks to my husband's daughters who began this whole mess, being homeless for two weeks,
seeing our rights stepped on and dealing with social workers who are trying to pass both of us (me especially) as crazy, and who do not even take us seriously, living with no furniture in a basement studio with no heat,and seeing how all the doors
to economic progress close here. My husband has to
be working a minimum wage job while half of our social security pension money has been cut, and we are taking food stamps. You would think that my
husband's daughters' dream vengeance could not get any worst that this. Well, unfortunately that is not true. Now they send papers in my name stating that I have to pay child support for my kids captivity in
the "loving" home that they are in. Unreal!
So now not only do we have to bear the burdensome
reality that our kids are in a hostile environment for
their emotional and developmental health, now we have to finance out of our empty pockets their
presence in such an environment.
DCYF is just a pawn of my husband's daughters that
of course wants to hide the injustice they have been part of and make some money as well. So when
the papers say DCYF against us, it's really his daughters against us using this shameful bureaucracy as a disguise for their disgusting thirst
for vengeance. Our money has been cut off thanks to them calling government agencies, we were homeless
for two weeks after having to leave all our things and
apartment in Spain. His daughters have good salaries plus receive a stipend from DCYF just to have
my kids all day in a day care center where they do not even know what it is to get one on one attention.
She even has a young lady who picks them and takes them to day care and beings them back. All this funding and cooperation so that she can pursue her
vendetta, but I guess that that's not enough for someone who is obviously out of control. Now
(and she and her sister as well as DCYF, know full well our monetary situation) we have to pay them
more money from our meager income to help finance
our kids continued presence in a destructive and unloving environment where most likely the money will not even be spent on them. I remember when my husband just to make gifts of money to his granddaughters and she would spend it on herself,
which is why he afterwards started giving them
savings bonds.So if she would do that with her daughters who she loves how can I expect her to
not squander any money I give my kids when she hates them? Furthermore I have no income as it is
my husband who is working so why even send such
papers in my name? I guess that I will have to just be
patient and wait for G-D to do justice. It's just that we have suffered a financial onslaught ever since we arrived here which is even worse than what we experienced in Spain.

The Cheapest Way To Get Revenge: Do It Through The Government!

Wednesday December 30, 2009

More novel ways of doing harm to others are emerging
in our modern pro-bureaucratic age, for those
harboring animosity towards individuals and who
want to find a cheap efficient way of doing some
real damage without looking bad in the eyes of others.
Is this becoming a disturbing new trend? Do some
research for yourselves and you'll see that it is.
The use of government agencies for personal
vendettas, which is further aided by the incompetency of said agencies as well as their never ending desire for funds,has signaled the end of many an innocent person's G-D Given right to live their
life in peace and freedom.
As a result of this ever increasing tendency many
light bulbs (dim ones though) are turning on in the heads of many wannabe avengers, as a solution to
their hatred woes is revealed.

"How can we get back at her good. Eureka! Let's call
a government agency and pretend that we're worried.
We look good, don't have to pay a cent, and we can
even get paid!"

And so a new destructive philosophy is born. One
that will occupy their every waking thought, their
petty thoughts that is, which is shown by the cynical
bunny below.

Of course those of us who have less destructive pastimes and who do not believe in using one's
anger towards others (whether it has a rational cause or not) to destroy their lives, should be concerned about situations such as mine, and those of others,
that can repeat themselves quite easily in anyone's
life. All you need are two factors is order to end up
like me: 1) an unscrupulous person who dislikes you
and 2) an inefficient government agency desperate
for funds in a time of economic difficulty, and
VOILA! there you have it, hell knocking at your door.
Unfortunately both abound in today's world.
Though I may say it in a humorous tone (and that's part of my personality, I can find some humor in the ironic despite being serious minded) the reality is very somber looking indeed.
Sadly this mentality exists and is even sometimes
glorified through the media as the pic below shows.

Bearing in mind that a vengeful person with no
control over their hatred is capable of anything, I
will continue to discuss the most recent outrage that
has occurred to us. In my last entry I spoke about how I finally managed to track the person who sent me that silly pink card (seen two entries before this one), who gave me child support court papers.
This is something that you would expect to pay an
ex-spouse, not someone who has viciously kidnapped
your kids and who is trying to ruin their lives and now wants you to finance it.
The documents that I will show below shows how low
DCYF/CPA has sunk. This agency knows our financial situation which in part has been created
by their cooperation in this injustice. They know that
I have no income,that only my husband is working, and that half of our social security pension
money has been cut off, that we were homeless until
just this past August, they see me with more or less the same clothes because of our economic situation,
so why send child support papers in my name?!
Even if they would come in my husband's name it would still be an outrage to have to pay someone for destroying your family when you're struggling to make ends meet because of them.
According to these documents DCYF made the decision to send us these papers on December the 11th (look at photo below). I only cover very personal
info.

It seems to be a nasty habit of DCYF to make decisions on their own without bothering to even consult us and then call to see us when they want us to blindly sign papers to accept the decisions that they have made without even talking to us first to see how we feel about it, or whether we agree or not.
The document above was signed on December 11th
and nobody from DCYF consulted us.
That's their view on us. After all why bother to even
consult us when in their eyes I and my husband are dummies who hinder our kids' progress, and my husband's daughters are "incredibly intelligent and mature" women who just "adore" my kids.
No wonder none of these workers pick up the phone or answer the messages we leave. Deep down inside they know that they are committing an injustice, that what they are doing is wrong.

The boldness with which these people make decisions,
without giving a hoot about how it affects us or our
children shows what happens when individuals get
accustomed to a no-accountability environment where
they can do as they please without having the
additional worry of pondering about whether it's
right or wrong, and what consequences they will
encounter if they are wrong. This attitude is not beneficial for anyone in the long run, it makes no difference whether it is a person's child or an agency,
those who do bad things should be held responsible
if not willing to rectify the error of their ways.

Distributing My Newly Composed Protest Song Against CPA Injustices

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

I tried to get into this site yesterday but was unable to
as the screenshot below shows:

Could not get in Blogger on January 5th 2010 Pic 3

I could not understand why after trying several
times to get into my account I was denied entry,
with the message wrong password, when I knew
that I was putting in the right password. Anyhow
the fact that I am making this entry proves that
I knew the password, and I Praise G-D that I was
finally able to get in.

I am writing this entry to promote a song that I
composed during December 31st 2009 to
January 2nd 2010 (with the exception of the time
span that comprised of the Sabbath in which
I did not work). The lyrics are a poem which I
wrote on December 31st 2009.
My reason for composing this song is simple, I
did a search on protest songs and noticed that
despite a abundant repertoire of songs on other
activist themes, there seemed to be no songs
protesting abuses that have been committed by
Child Protective Agencies against parents.
I composed this song and I am distributing it,
and giving full permission for it to be sung and
distributed to others to empower other parents
that might find themselves in situations
similar to mine (though I hope that no one ever has
to suffer what I've suffered).
The recording of this song was done on Sunday,
January 3rd 2010, and is above in this very site in a
small embeddable player. If for some reason the
player does not work it can be downloaded
from the site link which I will provide below, as well
as from my online music recording store at RawRip.
It is a free download. I am also distributing the
sheet music to the song so that it can be performed
by others. I include the sheet music embedded below:

The Hand That Robs The Cradle Recording(This link was fixed On Feb 28th)

An Erroneous Decision To Take Away Our Rights To Make Decisions For Our Children

Saturday (After Sabbath) January 23rd 2010

I have not written here for quite some time, though I
have written in my blog. I and my husband are concerned about a decision that was made quite
arrogantly without the least regard for our feelings
of not only placing our highly intelligent children in
Special Ed (ages 5 and 2 and a half) but of appointing
both an Educational Surrogate Parent and an Educational Advocate to make decisions regarding
our children's education.

Below is a copy of the certified letter that we sent yesterday before the Sabbath began to the RI
DCYF protesting said decision.

The Text Of Our Letter To DCYF

Thursday January 21, 2010

To DCYF Supervisor & Staff,

We, Wenceslao Gonzalez Junior and Cibeles Jolivette Gonzalez, parents who retain full parental rights over our children Wenceslao Adonis Gonzalez III (1/06/05) and Galileo Basilios Gonzalez (4/02/07), are writing this letter to you to make known our displeasure at the much erroneous decision to appoint either an Educational SurrogateParent or an Educational Advocate to our sons, and to demand that our rights as parents and as U.S. Citizens be respected and no longer trampled on.
Though you may have a certain perception of us (and a wrong one at that), your view of us does not give you the right to hinder due process or to deny us our rights.Throughout this whole surreal-like situation our rights have been consistently violated in what can only be said is a shameful manner. There was NO investigation in Spain prior to the children's removal, and we were given almost zero information about them while we were there.

We were denied a fair trial in Spain (where the removal of the children took place), our children were deported against our will and placed in the home of the person to whom both of us were strongly opposed should have custody of them.

On our arrival to the U.S. we have been confronted here (much to our dismay) by a similar pattern of civil rights violations. We have been given very little information on our children, and what little has been provided to us has almost always been of a vague nature. We have been excluded from making any decisions on our children's well being (with the exception of vaccines), when as their birth parents we are the only ones who can honestly claim to have their true best interests at heart, as parental love (and no other motive) influences our decisions with regard to them.

To claim to have a child's best interest in mind, and then exclude from major decisions that influence that child's life those who are most qualified in all truth to make that very claim is contradictory, and shows a lack of understanding of the importance of the child-parent bond which is so crucial for the emotional health of the child. We know the image that has been propagated of us by those who have (for their own personal motives) falsely accused us. The indifference with which our statements are received, and the way in which we have been lied to, also indicate that our intelligence to your eyes is dubious, and so the validity of our judgments is looked upon with what one can only presume is a mixture of mockery and skepticism.We have stated time and again that our children have no learning disabilities, and that what may appear in your eyes to be delay is merely the result of conditioning and trauma which has taken place after their removal from our home. We feel that the motives of our accusers, which led to our children being taken away from us without any due process should be taken into careful consideration if the desire to analyze this whole situation through an impartial scope is sincere.

Our eldest son Wenceslao (though never a very talkative child) has an extraordinary ability to learn, and far from being delayed at the age of two showed remarkable intellectual capacity and talent for his age. From an early age he has shown to be gifted in writing, music, and drawing, and prior to his removal used to be in love with learning. Our youngest child Galileo could count up to three in Spanish and say two or three other words prior to his removal at the age of one and a half. We feel that it is irresponsible to place labels on such a young child, who will not even be starting school for some years.The actions which you have proposed are for children who are struggling in school and who have shown great difficulty with learning.

How can one say that a two and a half year needs to be in special education when school is still a distant prospect, and yet claim that such a statement is rational? As for our eldest son's supposed inability to talk, we would like to make the following points which seem to have been overlooked:

1) If after over a year of separation from us, he is not only talking less but has forgotten all that he knew (which was remarkable for his age), it is more a proof of the incompetency of those that have had him after he was taken, rather than a supposed proof of any neglect on our part. We should not in any way be blamed for circumstances that have developed
after they were taken out of our quite competent care.

2) Even if, let's say for an example, our child was mute, that is not sufficient grounds for placing a child in special-ed, neither does it prove that he has a learning disability. A child could be mute and be brilliant. If our eldest son, who at the age of two knew what most five years olds are struggling to learn, has a learning disability, then it would be fair to say that most
kids should automatically be placed in special-ed. We have known kids who have had speech therapy and yet have never been placed in special-ed.

3) Our child has not yet begun school , so any belief that he will not be able to learn in school is more based on biased speculation than a careful observation of what the actual reality is. Should the hunches of a few self-important “experts” who have no real knowledge of how our son truly was prior to his removal, in order to be able to make a fair assessment, be allowed to so profoundly affect a child's life and future self-esteem?

We fervently object to all the decisions which you have made without the slightest concern for our dignity as parents and law-abiding citizens who have a right to a trial, without
having to witness our rights stripped from us beforehand. We are tired of decisions being made behind our backs, only to be called when we are needed to blindly agree to that which we
had no knowledge of beforehand. Such actions are but a pretense of legality and do not speak well of an agency that claims to serve the interests of families.

The statements that we received mention both the terms “Educational Surrogate Parent” and “ Educational Advocate” when they are two different things.
According to our understanding an Educational Surrogate Parent makes educational decisions for children in special-ed when their parents cannot be located, are deceased, have
relinquished or terminated their rights, or show no interest in their child's education.

Educational Surrogate Parents Are For Kids Who Have No Parents

No one can link any of these circumstances to our situation.

It's Usually The Parents That Hire The Educational Advocate

Educational Advocate Must Respect Parents' Rights

Educational Advocates are usually hired by the parents themselves when they fall into disagreement with the decisions of the school, and even though social workers can refer a child the evaluation must be done with the parent's consent. The evaluations which are being used to foist all these labels on our sons were hastily made almost immediately
after they were deported from Spain, and without our knowledge or consent. They were also made during a time period in which our sons had experienced great change and trauma. Any evaluation made while their separation from us persists will not be accurate due to the fact that traumatizing circumstances do not allow the normal behavior of a child to manifest itself, and without knowing how the child under normal circumstances truly behaves, an accurate assessment remains elusive.

What Educational Advocates Are For

Furthermore educational advocates are used for children who have behavioral, emotional, physical, or learning disabilities , conditions that our sons thankfully do not have.
Even when educational advocacy services are provided, the parent/guardian needs to be in agreement and retains the option of terminating services at any given time.

Parents Have To Be In Agreement & Can Terminate Educational Advocacy

We have stated numerous solid reasons for our present and future opposition to these decisions, but perhaps the most important reason which only serves to highlight the irony and
absurdity of this situation is that few parents care about education more than we do.
In an era where intense parental involvement in childrens' education is rare ( as public schools more than amply show) we created an environment for our children where learning was a
way of life and a joy rather than a burden. We have spent thousands of dollars on hundreds of beautiful books to give our children an impressive library. All these books at present are in Spain. Children's books imported from other countries as well as beautiful books from the U.S. that promote positive attributes. Our sons had hundreds of DVDs that were all
educational. All their toys were educational as well. All this we did with the earnest intention of giving them an excellent education based on the Bible, and complemented with the ability to know how to play musical instruments, to read and write music, to paint, and to read in several languages. Instruments in our house were a common sight. Our sons had guitars, pianos, and other types of instruments that are now in Spain. We invested in a costly computer system that teaches toddlers to play piano with the hope of beginning our eldest son on serious piano lessons as soon as he turned four. To our children, prior to their removal, praying and learning was part of their daily routine. Few parents have cared more about education or have invested as much as us in toys and books related to education. So it seems the height of irony that in
addition to all the rights that have already been denied us, that we should be denied one of the rights that we are most qualified to exercise. When you consider that one of us has years of experience tutoring children, and the other at present is working as a teacher's aide, to state that we are incapable of providing for our children's educational needs defies logic.

There is a difference between not wanting to accept erroneous decisions that we know with absolute certainty are based on a lack of awareness of what the reality is, and not caring about our children's education. Anyone who makes such a silly statement obviously does not know us and thus is not fit to pass a judgment on our abilities as a parent.

The truth is that our children are in no way thriving, but merely surviving a traumatic situation that was unnecessarily created by others. Academic excellence cannot be achieved
in a setting where a child's natural G-D given abilities and gifts are not only denied but even suppressed. Academic excellence cannot be achieved when the child is not only going through
a traumatic experience, but has the additional misfortune of being placed in an environment where love of learning is not promoted and even discouraged. The inefficient public school
system simply cannot cope with the influx of students who come to school from homes where such environments exist, so by placing our son in such a class the only possibility is that he will learn even less.

Most States Do Not Have Licencing or training for educational advocates

According to our research most states do not have licensing or training requirements for educational advocates, and even those parents who really want an educational advocate have a task on their hands trying to find a reputable one. Therefore to ask us to entrust the future of our children to someone who may not only lack the know-how to make sage decisions but who can never have a realistic appreciation of our sons' gifts and attributes, and thus their true potential, is to ask us to be reckless with our most precious asset...our
children.

Given the fact that appearances are but the reflections of circumstances, and that circumstances are subject to change, we feel that it is wrong to brand a child for the rest of his life as delayed or learning disabled, because of circumstances that existed for what we hope will be only a brief period of his life. Educational freedom is founded on the principle that parents are the best suited to make important decisions regarding the care and
education of their own children, because they are the only ones who can without doubt be said
have a selfless and altruistic interest in their children's well being.

The Constitutional right to be a parent should be sacred, as the family is the basic building
block of society. Parents have rights and children have rights, but children's rights are
best protected by protecting the rights of the only ones who will always have their best
interests in mind... their parents.

The Constitutional Right To Be A Parent

We refuse and appeal the decisions which have been made with regard to our children's

education for the reasons that we have stated in this letter. We will continue to oppose the actions proposed, and refuse to sign anything which will compromise our rights as loving parents or lead to the permanent labeling of our children and the scarring of their
potential.

Sincerely,

Wenceslao Gonzalez Jr.

--------------------------------------------

Cibeles Jolivette Gonzalez

---------------------------------------------------------

Before My Kids Were Taken Away

Monday, February 8th 2010

I have explained in my art gallery blog some days ago, how my family has been slandered, how things have been twisted or just plain fabricated in order to create an image of my family which is not real.
Situations which under normal circumstances would have never existed have been carefully created in an attempt to provoke certain behaviors and/or appearances that are then
carefully manipulated to create the image that is most beneficial for the motives of our accusers.

I find it downright ridiculous that DCYF thinks
that they can "help" my family by involving in our lives, on such a profound level the very people who have created all the problems that have existed in my marriage, and who wish to see my kids grow up in a broken home. When you want to solve a problem you get rid of the source of the problem, you don't further
nurture it.

I have never known the bliss of having a marriage of my own, with no outside interference.
Of being able to enjoy my life with my husband, without having to worry about people who were always trying to create problems in my life in their obsessive quest to wreck my marriage.

Yet despite enduring situations that would have made most women just quit, I have done everything to ensure that my sons do not grow up in a broken home. I always tried to make our homes as pleasant
to live in as possible, and with my kids I put a lost of emphasis on Bible and education.

One of the many falsehoods spread about us is that we lived in filth and disorder,in the link below
is a photo album of our homes which shows how we
liked to live in clean, well decorated homes. Ironically it is my husband's daughters, who up until
they reported us, have had messy houses.

Our Homes Prior To Our Kids Being Taken: A Photo Album

Below also is a video which shows scenes from when my eldest son was two years old. In these scenes
he had recently turned two, as most of the scenes are from before Galileo was born. If Galileo's small crib is visible, it's because I had everything prepared beforehand, before his birth in April.

At two my son knew the whole alphabet and could recognize all the letters. He could count up to ten in English, Spanish, and French. At two he could spell words that he saw written, though he could not read the word. He always showed great interest in learning from a very early age. At three he learned way more as is explained at the end of this video. I was always proud of his learning and did everything in my power to nurture his passion for learning new things. Everything that I bought him reflected the
ideal that the purpose of play is to learn.

I know that if my sons would not have been taken from me, my eldest son would have already been reading most likely at least first grade level books. Already by his present age (five years old) I myself could read and write, and Wencito (despite his silent nature) knew many things at two and three
years of age that I as a toddler did not know.

My poor youngest son Galileo has been seriously
jeopardized intellectually by this stupid situation.
My poor youngest boy, who also showed signs of being
highly intelligent prior to his abduction (for I cannot think of a more adequate word to describe the action) at present (at the age of two) does not know the alphabet and cannot count.This has been due to the environment in which he has been placed, and the trauma which he has suffered.

Since this situation was created for purely vengeful motives, and my husband's daughters know how much I value education, you can be sure that
on purpose (as a way of doing harm indirectly to me)
my children will be discouraged from engaging in
intense learning activities.Most likely my husband's daughters are doing everything that they know I will detest.
Giving them bad nutritionless conventional food, giving them uneducational toys that have no learning value, and putting on hours of brain-deadening cartoons.

I wish to take opportunity of this entry to make
some additional comments with regard to my sons' well being. Though for the last visits they have not been sick (Thank G-D for that!) I have been greatly concerned about my sons' weight. Both of them are skeletal.
My eldest boy was never an extremely chubby baby, but neither was he this skinny. My youngest boy was chubby and now he is skinny as well.

My eldest boy seems to me to be more or less the same height that he was in Spain,and I am concerned
at the possibility that my eldest son (who was always tall for his age) may have his growth affected by a
poor diet devoid of nutrients. As is more than confirmed in the minds of those who know about nutrition,poor nutrition can stunt a child's growth,
which is one of the reasons why in the Middle Ages people were shorter.

How An Improper Diet Can Make You Shorter

Poor Nutrition Stunts The Growth Of 200 Million Children(I fixed this link On Feb 28th)

I and my husband have expressed our concerns in the past to the lady who supervises the visits, about our sons' weight, so it is only logical to assume that my husband's daughters are aware of the comments which we have made with regard to this matter. Yet it seems that the only visible acknowledgement of our concern over their nutrition
was a shirt that my eldest son was wearing on my last visit with them (Wenesday February 3rd) which said
"Feed Me!" When a comment was made with regard
to the shirt I unhesitantly responded that the shirt was quite right, my son needed to be fed more, and more nourishing food at that!

Assuming that the shirt that my son was wearing that day was meant to indirectly mock my concerns about my son's health, it really does not have the desired impact on me, as I do not need a shirt to tell me what my eyes can plainly see, that my poor son is all skin and bones. Furthermore, assuming that it was done with this malign yet carefully concealed intention, it only helps to further
prove the immaturity of my husband's daughter, and the poor state of her black heart, if she is still not content with all the harm that she has done to my poor innocent babies, that she must in such an undignified fashion mock before my face the harm that she does to an innocent child who has never hurt anyone.

My second concern is with regard to my youngest son Galileo. On the January 6th visit he had a nasty scratch across his face and on his chest. I was
told that a child in daycare had done that to him.
This last visit when I rolled up his sleeves, I noticed
that he had several pink scars of what were scratches
on his arms. Now, I do not presume to know with exact certainty the nature or origins of these scratches, I have not really noticed them on Wencito.

However I do know how the minds of my husband's daughters function, as their own actions have given me a thorough insight into the way that they think.
I know that they are capable of venting their hatred on an innocent child. One of my worries is that since my youngest son looks just like me, they might vent
the hatred that they feel towards me on him. If even
to Wencito (who looks just like their father) they have done harm, imagine to his brother who is my spitting image! Though

My Last Visit With My Sons On Wed. Feb 17th

Friday, February 26th 2010

I am a bit late in writing this entry, but then again
I have had my share of unpleasant experiences this week, which I shall further relate in due time, and I
have had a lot of problems with my computer, with it
being hacked. For several days I have meant to write
about my last visit with my sons. It is ironic that in the last entry I had mentioned how they had not been sick for several visits and how I considered that to be a miracle after months of continuous illness.
Well, last visit they were sick again. They were coughing badly.
My sons as I have stated in previous entries are still skeletal, and my youngest son had the back part of his hair extremely dry and matted, and sticking up.
The lady that supervises the visit said that it was static from his hat. There is no doubt that this agency takes me for a fool and constantly underestimates my intelligence. I have put hats many times on my sons and their hair has never been like that. It was as dry as when one burns hair with a blow drier. That's how dry it was. My youngest son always had beautiful hair in silky curls, yet the back part of his hair during this last visit looked hideous. I have noticed that the lady who supervises the visits has taken my youngest son in the past to the bathroom to wet his hair.
My youngest son's "hair troubles" ( frankly I think that whoever is doing this to his hair is the one who is troubled) began in Jan 6th with a nasty haircut in which small areas of his scalp were visible.
For reasons that I shall explain further on, it seems that his hair is like that only for his visits with me.
This last visit during at least half of the visit time
(30 min) my sons rejected my company. When I told them to come to me they said "No!" and pulled away from me.
One does not have to be a rocket scientist to see that my boys are being conditioned by my husband's daughters, and that they take advantage of these visits to teach them certain behaviors that are meant to hurt me. This whole situation is nothing but one big government financed and bureaucracy backed
personal vendetta. My husband's daughters have an intense and irrational hatred towards me and are secretly jealous of my sons, nevertheless DCYF who has fallen victim to their good acting puts a deaf ear when I explain to them the more than evident motives behind this whole crazy affair.
As I saw my sons rejecting me, evidently malnourished, and my youngest son with dry matted hair sticking up at the back of his head, it was inevitable that I should with a sad look towards my sons , sadly contemplate my situation and that of my poor children who have suffered from trauma and conditioning. Yet at that moment, while for a few seconds I contemplated the fate of my kids, I saw the lady who supervises the visits with a smirk on her face begin to write on paper what most likely will be nothing more than biased opinions or twisted fabrications.
Of course no report will say "Mother was looking sad for several minutes because her children rejected her company, and were sick with a nasty cough."
Why say that when it is so much more entertaining to twist everything and then use it as supposed proof that I have a problem.
I have survived situations in which these DCYF workers who fancy themselves so stable, would most likely not be able to survive, much less remain
calm or focused in. But it is so easy to be judgemental when one is helping create problems for others instead of suffering them.
Actually, whoever violates a person's rights, and then involves on an all too intimate level in their life the very people that have wreaked havoc (no matter how hard they might be pretending now to be nice people)in their marriage, and then expect that person to be all happy and joyous about it, is the one who is out of touch with reality and obviously has a problem.
My eldest son during the last visit appeared to not even be able to recognize the letters of the alphabet, something which he could do at the age of two, and he is now five years old. I speak of what happens to me, to create awareness. What has befallen me could easily befall others if they have someone who hates them enough, and who is willing to use agencies to do what has been done to me.
My civil rights have been stepped on, this agency has humiliated me, I have seen the social worker in the past as well as the lady who supervises the visits smirk in a cynical fashion. I am treated as if I were an animal with no intelligence or rights. I have been denied total due process.
This agency in their supposed quest to protect my children from abuse, from someone who would never abuse them and who has never abused them, has placed them in an abusive and neglectful environment (despite the"pretty" appearances) with those who have never loved them, and goes on protecting the continued existence of that abusive environment while I am denied due process, while my Constitutional rights are trampled on, and everything is delayed on purpose while they continue in their desperate attempt to come up with something that they can twist or fabricate to
jeopardize my parental rights, and justify the taking
away of my children with no prior investigation or existence of evidence beforehand.
You do not take a person's children away and then for over a year deny them their rights in order to try to come up with something to justify what had no basis for being done in the first place.
The visit was a disaster as most likely was the hope of my husband's daughters (smile you two, for I know that you monitor my sites!). There is no doubt in my mind that they on purpose allow my kids to come in that condition to the visits, perhaps hoping that I will show anger in seeing them in such a state, and
that way they can write things about me in their "report". It's just as I have stated. The creation of artificial situations in an attempt to provoke and/or
create certain reactions or appearances which can then be further twisted and exploited to create a damaging image that is advantageous to their interests. It was only at the end of the visit that I was able to interact a bit with my sons, and it is because I insisted in interacting with them rather than they wanting to do so.
This agency does not consist of professionals, they are just in the anger provoking business.The only "skill" that you need for that is to abuse a person and trample on their rights. I have to see my sons in a pathetic state every two weeks and smile about it. Oh Yeah! Real realistic!

My Husband's Eldest Daughter Shows Up At Whole Foods With My Kids On Sunday Feb 21st

Friday, Feb 26th 2010

When I said in my previous entry (which I had to struggle to post) that I had my share of unpleasant experiences this week, the bitter icing on that cake was having to see my husband's eldest daughter show up early in the morning at Whole Foods with her husband and my kids (she did not bring her daughters).
I had gone early in the morning, and unfortunately had to rush to the rest room. While I was in the rest room feeling quite uncomfortable I heard someone pass by the stall where I was in and laugh. I recalled thinking how similar that cynical sounding laugh was to that of my husband's daughter. Nevertheless I did not give it much thought until I was washing up and my husband said outside the door, that my kids
were in the supermarket and for me to come out if I wanted to see them.
All at once different emotions swelled up within me.
Indignation, anger (of course), disbelief, and disgust, for I could guess the implications of this encounter.
I knew that any joy that I would get from seeing my beloved boys, would be quickly overshadowed by having to stare at the face of the person who has caused them so much grief and who deep down inside
desires anything but their happiness.
First before I continue any further I would like to state that on that day my kids did not appear to be sick, and Galileo's hair was normal looking, which is why I think that the hair is put like that for visits to annoy me and try to get me to react in a way that can be easily twisted by the people there in the DCYF building. No mother likes to see her children being used as pawns in a sickening vendetta, as if insinuating that their only worth is in the heartbreak that their suffering can cause to those who love them.
I approached this wolf in sheep's clothing as I saw her sitting with my husband and her husband , and my kids at the table, as if she had not done any harm to anyone. First I stared at her husband, I wanted to get a good look at the type of man who would allow his wife to do harm to others, especially children.
After silently looking at him for a minute he said,
"What?!"
"What?! These are my kids!" I replied.
Silence on his part. I turned to my husband's eldest daughter.
"You really have some nerve!" I told her.
"Yeah!" she said shrugging her shoulders and nodding in a cynical
fashion that showed total indifference to any pain she might cause to others. There could be seen an
intense arrogance in her eyes. The arrogance born from a lifetime of never being disciplined and from getting whatever she wanted. When someone considers themselves beyond the touch of accountability there is no limit to the harm that they can do to others, and so a lifetime of never being scolded and always getting her way had culminated in that tragic moment,tragic for others at present. Her daughters were not with them which I found odd, because you don't just go out on a Sunday morning outing and leave your daughters behind, also there is the fact that she does not eat organic. For months I have been complaining that my kids are not on the organic diet on which I had them, and that in part (poor nutrition) is why they have been nearly constantly sick.
(To be continued after Sabbath)

Saturday Feb 27th 2010 (After the Sabbath)

Before I continue with this second half of my entry,
I wanted to state that I was finally able to get into
my Buzznet account.

Yesterday

Cannot Record Buzznet Blockage With Video Recorder On Feb 26th At 4:25 PM

Today:

Was Able To Get Into Buzznet On Feb 27th At 9:00PM

Links:

Trying To Entry On Feb 26th At 3:33 PM

Trying To Still Post Entry On Feb 26th At 3:40 PM

I stared at this person who despite appearing externally to have so much really has nothing. Only her own well concealed bitterness and hatred to spoil
any true happiness or fulfillment that she may be able to obtain, and to cause difficulties to the lives of those around her. And I who may appear to have nothing, but yet have everything to feel fulfilled as
a person (though feeling fulfilled does not protect one from suffering and pain) my faith in the one True
infallible G-D of Israel, an awareness of my own self-worth, and a true sense of purpose in life, as well as a desire to do productive and worthwhile things despite the neverending presence of obstacles.
As I have stated in my first philosophy book "A Tapestry Of Thought", it is possible to be happy with yourself as a person, and who you are as a person, even if you are not happy with the things that have happened to you.
I sensed the futility of giving in to her intense need to provoke me to anger and to create more conflict.
Finally I said in a confident voice " Don't worry you'll
have your punishment from G-D soon enough."
"Oh yeah!" she said with a cynical face, her facial expressions seem to dare to defy the reality of G-D's justice and the Biblical doctrine of accountability for the unrepentant.
That someone who has done so much harm could be so at ease with her deeds, shows the blindness that comes with the delusion of thinking oneself above
the moral laws that govern humanity. The result of never be scolded or corrected during a lifetime no matter what the action committed.
She looked at my husband who was sitting next to her with Galileo on his lap. My kids in all the time that I was there made no sign of recognizing my presence, a firm testimony to the conditioning that they have received.I kissed my eldest boy's head but he was unresponsive. Suddenly in an instant with an expression that indicated that she had forgotten something that she had clearly planned to say, she looked at my husband then turned to me and said, "Oh, and I really hope that you get your kids back soon!"
The comment was obviously said with the intention of further injuring my dignity and thus driving me over the edge. For she and I both knew that it was a very well camouflaged taunt, and she knew that I knew that she really meant the exact opposite of what her hypocritical lips had just uttered.
Not falling for her petty psychological games which only served to show her desperation, I calmly replied
"Well you always were a very good actress."
At this point my husband scolded me for having said that she was a good actress, though I had been speaking in a civil enough manner to this undignified woman during this whole unpleasant encounter.
I really do not understand my husband's behavior as of late, a month and a half ago he had been saying that even though he knew that they were his daughters, he knew that G-D was going to punish them for all the harm that they had done to us, and now he was sitting there with her as if this woman had not done anything to us, when we have suffered the unimaginable, even to the point of being homeless for two weeks in RI because of her, and my kids were abused for two months in Spain, and now were being abused and conditioned, and labeled with
phony diagnosises because of what she has done.
I said to my husband, "This is just a desperate attempt of her's to provoke me to anger." and with those words I started to leave the supermarket. My husband's son-in-law said that he was leaving and got up as I was leaving, I told them "No stay, stay.
Stay with your daddy!"
I left and went to a bookstore to continue doing what I had to do.
What she and my husband spoke afterwards I do
not know. My husband later on told me that after I had left she had eaten in a hurry, and had left quickly. What has happened to me is all so indignant and surreal,but I have faith that the G-D of Israel will do justice for me as HE sees all and knows all. Blessed be HIS HOLY NAME forever.

I nevertheless provided a alternate link in that entry (December 2nd) because other activist groups had
copied the article before it was taken off.
I will provide the link here as well:

Copy Of Withdrawn Article

While I was checking my links to see how they were working, I saw that my link to the recording page of my CPA Protest song "The Hand That Robs The Cradle" had been tampered with again in some way,
as it was once again not working.

Hand That Robs Cradle Recording Link Not Working On Feb 28th At 1:27 AM

I went to edit the html link code and found this:

HTML Of Link Present When I Went To Edit On Feb 28th At 1:30 AM

Observe in the pic above the html link code at the bottom.

Corrected HTML of Hand That Robs Cradle Link On Feb 28th At 1:31 AM

Because my kids have been labeled with false diagnoses, and because I know that many kids are
suffering from the same fate, in order to fuel the never ending avarice of the pharmaceutical industry,
that has a very willing ally in the pseudoscience that
is psychiatry, I am placing some links to show
what is going on in this very disturbing realm, where
the only ones who are disturbed seem to be the ones
who are doing the supposed diagnosing.
In this society it seems as if everything is remedied by a drug, so that every conceivable problem from trouble sleeping, to trouble learning, to feeling sad, to even having beliefs that are not in tune with the times (such as belief in the Bible, if that can be considered a problem to the secular oriented) is solved by the all mighty pill! So in effect the pharmaceutical industry is claiming to have the solution to our problems or potential problems within their grasp.
No matter that it may be a problem caused by nutritional deficiencies, a need for G-D's presence in one's life, traumatic situations, lack of open communication, things that cannot be solved by chemical intoxication, or simply be a problem that does not really exist.
Telling people to have a more godly lifestyle, to obey
the Biblical commandments and teachings, to learn how to communicate effectively, to eat a wholesome
(preferably organic) diet, simply offer no big financial gain to those who have managed to make a
gold mine out of the prestigious looking yet mythic world that is psychiatry.
There are some passages from the Bible that when examined within the context of modern times can shed some light on why psychiatry, despite it's vast
arsenal of complicated terminology, is a pseudoscience.

1 Samuel 21:12-15 " And David laid up these words in his heart, and was sore afraid of Achish the king of Gath. And he changed his behavior before them, and feigned himself mad in their hands, and scrabbled on the doors of the gate, and let his spittle fall down on his beard. Then said Achish to his servants, See, you see the man is mad: why then have you brought him to me? Have I need of mad men, that you have brought this fellow to play the mad man in my presence? shall this fellow come into my house?"

In some Bible translations like the New International Version, or New Living Translation
the preface of Psalm 34 reads:

A psalm of David, regarding the time he pretended to be insane in front of Abimelech, who sent him away. I will praise the LORD at all times. I will constantly speak HIS praises.

So from the Bible we know that David at one time in his life pretended to be crazy in order to escape a
dangerous situation, yet we know that he was never
crazy from the life that he had afterwards, though he may have made many foolish mistakes such as his sinning with Bathsheba, or his poor parenting skills and inability to discipline, which resulted in rebellious and disobedient children.
But if king David would try to pull that stunt in our modern age what would happen to him? How would a psychiatrist be able to figure out that he is just pretending? That it is all an act? Is there a concrete test that can be done, something not based on innuendos, biased speculation, or second-hand unfounded information, or just personal opinion that happens to carry a lot of weight?
Here is where psychiatry is shown for what it is.
You see, if a person goes to a doctor and pretends
to suffer from cardiac problems, the farce would not
last long, because a series of tests that are based on
scientific fact (not speculation or guessing, or what that specific doctor's opinion is) would reveal that
the man has a perfectly healthy heart. Which is why
physical medicine is a real science (even if it too has fallen prey to the lure of pharmaceutical profits).
But if king David would do what he did in Biblical
Times, now, in our time, how would the "doctor" know that he is simply pretending? Is there a test that allows you to know if the emotions or behaviors that a person exhibits are feigned or genuine? One would have to be a mind reader I think, and even if one were a mind reader that would not be concrete proof.

So many new disorders are coming out that it's hard to keep track, and just as quickly as a new disorder appears on the scene, there seems to instantly be available a drug to "cure" it, as if both had appeared together hand-in-hand.

In cases such as that of my eldest son who was
diagnosed with Reactive Attachment Disorder (you can read more about this "disorder" and how I refute that stupid claim in my Nov.24th entry in this site, just scroll up) and other "disorders", an artificial
situation (which under normal circumstances would have never existed) was created in which my children were knowingly placed in a traumatic environment despite our protestations, and most likely my son, who has been deprived of our love and care for over a year, and who had never been apart from us before this situation arose, may have at one point in time reacted as any normal child of such a tender age, would react when going
through a traumatic experience, so in order to cover up their BIG boo-boo, and at the same time make some extra money from what will now be considered a "special needs child", DCYF twists the same situation that they themselves created, and smacks my poor, already traumatized child with multiple fictitious labels that only exist by virtue of the weight that their so-called "professional expertise" carries.
And what gives a person's opinion weight? Well, unfortunately we live in a world governed by external appearances. A person can be wise and shabby looking, and another person can be well dressed and unknowledgeable, yet it is the well dressed one that will be listened to. A diploma, a job position, be it through some merit or through opportunities and connections, give too many an individual an aura of
infallibility which alas! only exists in the perceptions
of the beholder.

It is ironic, and yet important to understand that
G-D who is TRULY infallible rejects our methods
for determining a person's so-called infallibility.

1Samuel 16:7 "But the LORD said to Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD sees not as man sees; for man looks on the outward appearance, but the LORD looks on the heart."

Everything is governed by appearance, even these
psychiatric terms that with their complex sounding
words create a weight of authority that is simply based on a mirage. People think that because a disorder sounds so complex it must be real, but yet
nothing is as complex as falsehood, for falsehood
must twist, and fabricate, and deceive to exist, whereas truth simply has to be what it is, truth.

Yet unfortunately, even when that weight is nothing but hot air, it is still nevetheless weight, and as such has the ability to crush those on whom it falls upon.
My poor sons are two of many small victims, as the below link will show:

On Psychiatry & Child Protective Services In The Unites States By Dr. Fred Baughman

Any science that exists solely by the perceptions of it's practitioners (however prestigious those perceptions may be) ceases to be science.
The problem with psychiatry is that situations can be created artificially (as has occurred with my family)
to create certain perceptions that are unreal, behaviors if examined through a biased and judgmental scope, more in harmony with the findings
that the psychiatrist is hoping for, and deep down wants to find, rather than with the actual reality of the circumstances that are present,inevitably leads to false labeling.
Psychiatry comes from two Greek words:
psykhe- "mind" & iatreia "healing ,care".
It would also be of interest to point out that
"iatros" is "doctor" in Greek.
But yet the definition of mind is the following:
Mind is the aspect of intellect and consciousness experienced as combinations of thought, perception, memory, emotions, will, and imagination, including all unconscious cognitive processes. The term is often used to refer, by implication, to the thought processes of reason, mind manifests itself subjectively as a stream of consciousness.

How can you control all these elements with drugs?
How can you control a person's beliefs, emotions, or
perceptions by drugging them up?
If a Hindu believes that a cow is a god, as irrational as that belief may be, how can you make that person cease to believe that by drugging them up?
If a person prays to a statue and thinks that it is alive, and that it is listening to him or her, as irrational as it may be, how can a drug make a person stop doing that? What is the difference between a person that talks to a wall, and one that talks to a statue?
Only thoughts can have the ability to influence other thoughts, not a pill. That is why a person through reason, and through being taught about the Bible (but not forced) can cease to think that a cow is a god, or that a statue has to be prayed to.
Perfectly sane people can have irrational beliefs, precisely because of the fallibility of human nature.
I think that praying to a statue is irrational, but I don't think that the person who prays to it is crazy,
it's just a fallibility of human judgement and an unwillingness to see Biblical truths.
Unless a person is basing their judgement of what is irrational, on what the Bible says, which was written by an infallible G-D, it is dangerous for society as a whole, when a fallible human being dares on his own to pass sentence on another person's beliefs or thoughts, because just as
the fallibility of man (such as the person who prays to a statue) can make him think that an irrational belief is rational, the fallibility of man can likewise make him think that a rational belief is irrational
(such as believing in the Bible in modern times, believing in Galileo's time that the sun is the center of the solar system,etc).
A perfect example is how in the 1840's some southern "doctors" said to have discovered an "illness" called Drapetomania which was characterized by the inexplicable, mad longing of a slave for freedom! This was actually considered a mental illness at that time! Don't believe me, read the link below:

Wikipedia Link Explaining What Is Drapetomania

Just as this so-called disorder of 19th century psychiatry catered to the interests of southern plantation owners, a lot of these
so-called disorders of nowadays cater to the interests
of many: pharmaceutical companies, agencies like DCYF, psychiatrists who recieve fat commisions.
Just as Drapetomania sounded so real and scientific, and twisted a very normal reaction in an oppressed human being, to label that person as mentally ill, many modern disorders that are equally scientific sounding are nothing but an eloquent sham.

Even when a person may be having a certain problem, there are plenty of natural cures that are available that when combined with good diet, and a godly lifestyle, should restore a person to perfect health.

Natural Remedies For Depression

In many cases a child's inability to focus and learn can be caused by a poor diet, too many products with refined sugar, an environment where love of learning is not taught, or the child has not been taught discipline in order to be able to focus on things. Vaccines have also been considered as a possible cause.

Natural Remedies For ADD

Friday, March 12th 2010,

I am writing to speak about my last visit with my sons which took place on Thursday Mar 4th
in the afternoon, and also about other circumstances which have arisen and the concerns that I have about them.

My eldest son was enrolled in a pre-school program. Of course I was
not consulted beforehand, they just went and did what they felt like doing, then tried to feign legality
by sending me a letter afterwards.

It is quite possible that my husband's daughter who monitors all my sites has taken this step of putting him in pre-school as a way to ensure that he gets placed in Special Education, which is her goal.

By placing him in pre-school, but yet conditioning him not to learn, and exposing him to further trauma, she most likely hopes that he will thus do poorly in pre-school and so be able to combat the following passage from the letter which I wrote to DCYF and which can be found in my January 24th entry.

" 3) Our child has not yet begun school , so any belief that he will not be able to learn in school is more based on biased speculation than a careful observation of what the actual reality is. Should the hunches of a few self-important “experts” who have no real knowledge of how our son truly was prior to his removal, in order to be able to make a fair assessment, be allowed to so profoundly affect a child's life and future self-esteem?"

If such is the case they unfortunately are ignoring the other part of the same letter which states:

"Academic excellence cannot be achieved
in a setting where a child's natural G-D given abilities and gifts are not only denied but even suppressed.

Academic excellence cannot be achieved when the child is not only going through
a traumatic experience, but has the additional misfortune of being placed in an environment where love of learning is not promoted and even discouraged.

The inefficient public school
system simply cannot cope with the influx of students who come to school from homes where such environments exist, so by placing our son in such a class the only possibility is that he will learn even less."

In other words even if my child is observed in pre-school the observation will not be valid until my son is in a non-traumatic environment.

While he is in an unloving environment ( and no matter how hard she might pretend to these gullible DCYF workers, the undeniable reality is that my husband's daughters do not love my sons at all, and G-D knows that that is the truth) and being conditioned to not want to learn, any supposed observation is tainted.

Just like evidence from a crime scene is not valid if there was someone there before the forensic investigators arrived, touching or handling the evidence.

I have nothing against pre-school, but I know from what has occurred that this DCYF agency, and
my husband's daughters especially, have no real interest in my son's education.

Any child that used to be so enthusiastic about learning, and who used to know so much, and now appears to know nothing, cannot be in an environment where his educational needs are being met or where his potential is being nurtured.

Of course what is ugly must disguise itself as pretty in order to become "acceptable", and nothing is uglier than injustice.

So it's no wonder that when the letter explains why my son was placed in pre-school it states that it
is so that he can take full advantage of this "educational opportunity".

Wow! Some educational opportunity!

What about the educational opportunity of letting his mommy teach him or engage in learning activities during visits?

Since November I have been discouraged from
engaging in learning activities such as piano playing, or writing lessons because I was supposedly "overwhelming him."

What can be more overwhelming than being in an environment where you are not loved or valued, more than a year away from your parents, and almost always constantly sick!

My sons (my eldest especially) have changed so much in behavior that sometimes I feel as if I do not know them anymore.

They certainly seem at times to view me as a stranger.

Ever since DCYF banned me from engaging in hands on learning activities with my eldest son his learning has been greatly jeopardized.

Looking at my son now, one would never believe how brilliant he was at the age of three.I guess than more than a year of conditioning and trauma have done their sinister work.

My kids at present are living through a nightmare created by their grown half-sisters, and the fact that their tender age does not allow them to fully grasp the implications of all that has occurred only makes matters worst,because my eldest son may feel abandoned by me, and most likely is being indoctrinated against me .

In case you are wondering, why would any grown woman want to do so much harm to a defenseless child, the answer is because despite appearances, my husband's daughters are children mentally.

My husband spoiled them rotten, never disciplined them, and never so much as dared raise his voice to them even when they have disrespected him.

In July of 2009 , when I briefly saw my sons for a few minutes in front of his eldest daughter's house,(I did not see them again until the end of September when I got bi-weekly visits with them) his youngest daughter called him an idiot in front of my face! My husband just kept talking sweetly to her as if she had not said anything!

Even though she did apologize a month later on the phone, the reality is that my husband never corrected her,he never corrects them, not even in minor things.

Now, I love my husband and have no intention of leaving him (frown you two, for I know you monitor my sites) though I must admit I am sometimes baffled by how his family is, and my patience is greatly challenged.

It pains me to see the level of manipulation that
is at work here, and how my kids are tragically at the center of this mess.

They know the power that they have over my husband, and the fact that he also would dote on them and baby them ( even when they were already old),combined with the trauma that they suffered when their mom left my husband, have made them extremely possessive of him to the point that they do not want to see him married to anyone.

So this is why they view I and my sons as a threat to their position as pampered children.

My kids are just the means to an end, and that end is to destroy my marriage while making my life a living hell.

So DCYF is helping two obsessed women wreck their father's marriage and my sons' home. Whether they realize it or not that is the reality.

Their extremely well concealed jealousy towards my sons is a matter of great concern for me.

It is because they are such good pretenders, and because DCYF also does not take me seriously, that I feel that the possibility of abuse behind closed doors towards my sons is greater.

My husband unfortunately made matters even worst in the past by bragging to them on the phone about how much Wencito knew when he showed signs of being highly intelligent at the age of two.

I knew that they were jealous of him, and I recalled telling him not to tell them anything about what he knew.

The pride that my husband showed at what our eldest son knew is the root of their obsession to pass him off as retarded.

They have to smear him with a label that will impact how others view his worth, in order
to feel a bit better about their insecure selves.

Many of the things that they have done are SOOO childish in nature, that you would expect this from a 12 year old, not someone in their mid-thirties and almost kicking on forty (pardon the slang)!.

First, as retaliation for I having used the Internet to tell the truth about the injustices that have occurred to me (they feel that their victims don't have a right to complain) they have made sites with my name such as the one below:

CibelesGonzalez.com Pic1

Because I used this term (highlighted in pic below) to describe the lies that they are saying about my sons:

What I wrote in my site against CPA Abuse

They took out a domain name with my name, and obviously paid someone to design a site, just to get back and write this! (shown in pic below)

Biography of CibelesGonzalez.com site

As if that were not enough, a whole medley of Cibeleses with indirect taunting comments have emerged in Facebook and other similar networking sites. (Some of them are shown below)

Another Cibeles On Facebook

A Cibeles' Enlightening Comments On Facebook

Familiar Cibeles Changed To Cibeles Cartoon

Now, you would think that with creating all these time consuming pages and sites they would
be satisfied.

But nooo! They apparently have been making even more pages on a network which I joined,that was supposed to be for parents who had lost their kids to DCYF/CPS Agencies.

I noticed the trend in January when I took the first screenshots, and what began as a trickle soon became a flood. By March, eleven pages of weird photoless "members" with only first names and no page content, except announcing pharmaceutical drugs, inundated the site to the point that I was virtually unsearchable!

Some of the names of these
"members" are either the same as people that they know, or only vaguely disguised.

The first is Abijah which is similar to the name of my husband's eldest granddaughter Alijah.

abijahpic1

Abijah talks about autism in her page which has really no content. My husband's daughters had in the past tried to label my eldest son as autistic (now they've labeled him, as well as his brother with other things).

Abijahpic2

An important part of understanding my husband's daughters is that they love to do their deeds anonymously in order to avoid accountability.

Because of this they have become experts not only at manipulation, but at indirect taunts.

Those who know me, will look at these sites and
realize by analyzing the comments, that they are well
camouflaged taunts which my husband's daughters know that I can perceive.

This is my eldest son's middle name.

adonispic1

Now, this name sounds similar to the name of my best friend's daughter Adriana.

I do not know if my husband in the past may have mentioned her name to his daughters in a conversation.

Adriano pic1

These "members" all seemed to have joined on the same day.

In Stolen Network Adonis, Adriano, & Abijah on Jan 13th 10:13pm

Afterwards more strange "members' joined.

No Members Are Visible Because These Drug Announcers Have Occupied the Whole Homepage On Mar 3rd At 8:10 AM

This one was announcing Viagra, on a site that
is supposed to be for parents who have lost children
to DCYF.

Declan's Blog On Mar 3rd At 8:31 AM

Here is the name (on the upper right) of my husband's ex- son-in-law Frasier.

It seems that they used his name too.

Page 6 Continued On Mar 3rd At 8:54 AM

After eleven pages of photoless members announcing drugs, I appear.

I A True Member Finally Come Out On The 11th Page On Mar 3rd At 9:09 AM

Yet according to DCYF, who swallows all the tales that my husband's daughters tell them, I'm the one who is unstable!

Never mind that I have survived situations in which most people would have had nervous breakdowns, or that I would never do such stupid,
immature things on the Internet.

I only use the Internet to try to obtain justice for my family while creating awareness, and to work on my online businesses.

However (tragic for me) these are the women who are "taking care" of my sons.

They use their free time seeing how they can harm me, and most likely are connected to the intense hacking that I have experienced on my computer.

No one seeing all the the screenshots that I have uploaded to my photo albums can deny that my computer is being hacked.

And if still anyone should be skeptical in the face of so much evidence as to doubt, I have screenshots of a scan which I did in January on my computer that confirms the presence of hacking software in my window registry keys (which is very difficult to remove manually).

So most likely this is just an attempt to silence me, especially when I express the indignation that I feel as a mother at the state of my sons when I see them bi-weekly.

I am to see my sons this Thursday (as the visits have been changed because of Wencito's pre-school).

I am not too optimistic about how I shall find them.

Last visit (March 4th) my eldest son continues to shun my attempts to interact with him, preferring instead my husband's company.

Now, it does not bother me that he wants to interact with his father, what bothers me is the fact that my eldest son does not wish to interact with me (and on most occasions my youngest son as well) and that it most likely is the result of conditioning.

(I had a browser crash as I was writing this entry and when the tabs were restored my entire entry had been erased. Fortunately I always work with copies in text document. So I will save this part first and will shortly place the second part. If it does not come out it means that I was blocked.)

There were two ladies supervising the visit this time. The lady who usually supervises the visits and an intern. As the visit was late in the afternoon there were few people in the building.

My son Galileo interacted a bit with me on this last visit, but whenever I tried to kiss him he would push away from me, and he seems to interact more with the lady who supervises the visits than with me whom he rarely sees.

This time Galileo's hair was normal looking, and he seemed to have gotten some sort of haircut.
However his clothes did not seem very clean.

My eldest son Wencito spelled out some words during this last visit , but then again he could do that at the age of two, and if were not for this situation he would have been most likely reading by now. It has been some time since I have seen Wencito writing well, and he no longer seems to be much interested in drawing, activities that were exciting for him prior to his abduction.

Wencito has already shunned my company
for several visits, and it is quite possible that my husband's daughters are trying to sever his bond with me, not only to hurt me (which is always a main goal on their agenda), but to also make it difficult for me
to teach him or engage in learning activities with him.

Even before he started shunning me he had always seemed a bit distant in visits, though he would still interact with me, say things to me, and sit on my lap. I had already stated previously in this entry how DCYF has discouraged me since November from engaging in learning activities such as piano playing (I used to bring a keyboard at one time), writing lessons, and counting in other languages apart from Spanish such as French, and teaching him how to write simple words in Hebrew, which are all things that he knew at one time. However even with these restrictions I would still read to him
books, and try to re-interest him in drawing, something which he used to love. So it is easy to see how by conditioning the child to not only not want to learn, but to shun interaction with me as well, it would be difficult for me to continue doing those activities with him.

My husband's daughters know that I will try to help my son regain the knowledge that he once had,
they also know that I have always put much emphasis on education, which is why so much of their vengeance has to do with education. Passing my sons as retarded or delayed (which also is connected to my husband's past praise of Wencito), putting my sons in Special Ed, conditioning my eldest son to not want to learn, depriving me of the rights to make decisions on my sons' education. These are all things that they know will hurt me because of who I am as a person, because of my personality. If I were a dumb person who never picks up a book in years, and who never gave a single thought to learning, this
emphasis on attacking my sons' intelligence, and
on discouraging them from learning would not exist.

This is nothing but a sophisticated
vengeance aided by government bureaucracy that
employs manipulation and psychological games. Also by attacking my sons' intelligence it's a way of indirectly attacking my intelligence as well.
It's really all so pathetic.

I see that my relationship with my children is being destroyed to satisfy the capricious whims of two insecure women who never grew up emotionally,
and who feel that their father has to be chained to them forever. In which case DCYF, far from protecting from abuse is an accomplice in child abuse, by aiding in the Parent Alienation that has taken place.

After I tried to interact with Wencito several times he went into an inexplicable fit of laughter which made his face greatly redden, and which made it difficult not only for I, but for my husband to interact with him. He had not been like that at the beginning of the visit, nor has he ever behaved like that in any of the previous visits, neither here nor in Spain. Towards the end of the visit he was hiding under my coat, and it was with great difficulty that his coat could be put on. I was told that he had been overstimulated at school, but if this were the case he
would have behaved like this from the beginning of the visit, instead of starting to act like this halfway through it.

I am greatly concerned about my sons. Never did I envision that any child of mine would go through such experiences. I pray that the G-D of Israel, in the name of the Messiah Yeshua do justice for me soon.

Struggling Once More To Place An Entry

Friday, March 19, 2010

First, I will be posting a copy of my blog
entry today, which will further explain why
it has taken me so long to post an entry on
this site.

Once again I am being blocked from putting
an entry in my CPA site.
As I was about to start on the entry the browser
crashed. When the browser tabs came back, and
I tried to open a new blog element, I was blocked
from opening it.No matter how hard I tried I
could not. I took a video which proves what is
happening as well as some screenshots.

I have had several browser crashes just
trying to paste a simple comment under
the video which I uploaded.

Since I do not know if the video will be

hacked, I am placing the link as well.

Cannot Open Blog Element On Mar 19th At 9:36 AM

Actually as I continue this entry, it has

taken me over two hours to write it, after

experiencing multiple browser crashes!

On many occassions the browser has crashed

and when restarted has crashed again before

ever even re-opening!

I have the screenshots to prove this.

Hours of struggle just because I wanted to post

an entry on my site against CPA Abuse!

After trying to open the "add gadget" section

on the CPA site, nothing at first would come out

, as if it's function was being blocked somehow.

Finally, when it began to function,like 17 of the

gadget tabs opened up!

Most likely the hacker was in his or her computer

paralyzing that specific function, and when they

decided to let go, all those tabs came out from all

the times that I had tried to open the add-a-gadget

tab.

Browser Goes Haywire After I Try To Open Blog Element On Mar 19th At 9:37 AM

Unfortunately, after several browser crashes, the video that I had uploaded appeared to

be hacked somehow.

Of course I can never be sure, if this affects only my computer or others as well.

Video Appears To Be Hacked On Mar 19th At 10:23 AM

I have many screenshots to document this sorry episode which at present I cannot place

in this entry.

The few images that I did upload were with great struggle, as each time that I

uploaded something the browser would crash.

I will however show below a screenshot from one of the many crashes. The one

from 10:54 AM.

The crash was so sudden that the Image shack web page was actually imprinted

on the image program which also crashed.

I will be writing an entry in my CPA Site, unless I'm blocked again.

The person who is doing this to my computer is obviously connected in some way to my

husband's daughters, who have the most to gain from shutting up my voice, after viciously

slandering me, and stealing my sons from me without an investigation over a year ago for

their sinister yet infantile vendetta.

Restoring Crashed Browser On Mar 19th At 10:54 AM

Another thing that has been happening to me (though it is in no way new) is that comments written by me

on Buzznet, either do not appear, and when they do appear, they state an incorrect time of posting.

I wrote the one-word comment below ( it had been my second comment) at the time indicated in the

screenshot, when the browser was crashing non-stop like every two minutes!

Naturally,under such circumstances, I had no time to write anything more lengthy than what

is seen here.

Comment Written In Haste On Mar 18th At 3:26 AM

Neither of the two comments that I had written were showing up on my page.

Comments Not Showing On My Computer On Mar 18th At 3:37 AM

Afterwards, much later on in the day, the comments appeared with faulty times. It had

indicated 3:26 AM when I posted the second comment (which was the correct time), so

why was it now stating 12:27 AM as the time of posting?

Times Shown For Comments On Mar 18th At 7:37 PM

I wrote another comment with a link and posted it at 9:30 PM (screenshot shown below).

The purpose of the comment was to explain the nature of the two laconic

below it, while providing a link to the album that shows screenshots of the problems

that I have had with posting comments.

Comment Posted On Mar 18th At 9:30 PM

The problem is that ( at least on my computer) the comment is not appearing either.

Previous Comment Not Appearing On Mar 18th At 10:13 PM

Most Recent Comment Still Not Visible On Mar 19th At 12:12 AM

I really hope in G-D that this bizarre and abnormal situation ceases so

that I can work in peace.

If other people in their twisted minds believe that they have a right to

hurt I and my children, I certainly have a right to not allow myself to be

victimized, and to defend myself, and my sons, in a legal and civil fashion

(unlike the actions of those who have harmed me) while I pursue justice.

This is a revised entry, with spelling errors corrected. Any errors in spelling

are due mostly to speed writing because of frequent browser crashes, but

could also be due to actual tampering with the text (it has happened to me

before, not only with text but with html code as well).

Continuation Of March 19th 2010 Entry

It is 4:05 PM as I begin this, and I am finally writing the entry that I started to write around 9:30 AM!
I have had to bear an onslaught of injustices that fortunately few people have had the misfortune of
receiving. I had written in my March 14th entry how my children view me as strangers. My eldest for several visits has refused to interact with me, and my youngest boy interacts with me on a minor level on some visits, but on other visits he also has refused me.
No doubt my husband's daughters who monitor my sites, and who feel that sadistic pleasure at causing untold grief to others, in a vain attempt to feel better about themselves, are having the time of their lives.
They are doing what they have dreamt of doing for years. Since 2006 they have wanted to take my then only son away from me. Now they have stolen both of my sons, have conditioned them, and have altered their behavior in order to falsely label them, and have seriously damaged my relationship with them.
I see my sons only one hour every two weeks. According to DCYF (who does not feel bashful about using emotional blackmail) only parents who are receiving "services" can see their kids on a weekly basis. It's a way to manipulate, and to bring in more income for themselves by mercilessly tugging at a parent's already bruised heartstrings.
As I stated long ago, the only services that they have
rendered are to the vengeful whims of my husband's daughters.

This is what DCYF has done for us: Participate in
the destruction of our family. My kids feel no affection for me anymore, have been brainwashed
and conditioned, my eldest son has forgotten practically everything that he knew and no longer cares about learning, DCYF has contributed to our economic troubles, including the brief period in which we were homeless. Their unjust and unnecessary intervention was crucial to denying us a trial in Spain, where our kids were taken from us
with no due process whatsoever. They have been
accomplice in attempting to create strife between I and my husband, and have labeled my kids with phony conditions which they do not have, in addition to showing a total disregard for our dignity and our rights.

So having to have had endured the unendurable, I
do not take it lightly when my visits are canceled, and I go three weeks without seeing my kids.
This week I did not see my boys. My husband said that he was called at his job and told that the lady who supervises our visits was sick, so we would get visits next week and the following week. Which means that I will be three weeks without seeing my kids. My boys, who are being conditioned and who already view me as a virtual stranger.
Now, I can understand if the regular worker , being sick, stays home. What I would like to know is if they have a substitute, and if there is one, why could she not stay to supervise the visit. The substitute working for DCYF must surely know where the building is located, and also would have been told where to pick up my sons.
The reality is that the less time my children see me
the more profound the Parent Alienation becomes,hence the more long lasting the trauma.
It's bad enough to know that my sons are simply being used as pawns in a vendetta, and as such are conditioned to act in a certain way meant to cause me grief. But now I have to go on more time without seeing them.

Anyone who helps destroy a child's relationship
to his mother, and then has the audacity to claim that they are "helping" that child is out of touch with
reality. These social workers think that they are such
experts in child development, yet they cannot even
grasp the importance of the bond that exists between a mother and her child. They cannot see that despite their at times convincing pretense, my husband's daughters are still traumatized (after all these years) from when their mom left my husband, that they feel displaced by my sons, and part of their intense need to wreck my marriage is because they do not want my sons to enjoy what they themselves had only for a short time: a home with both parents living together. They are just venting their hatred towards me, as well as their long suppressed anger and frustration at my sons. Unfortunately DCYF is too blinded by external appearances to figure it all out.
According to them the loving mom dressed in shabby clothes must be at fault, and the selfish woman
who never gave a hoot about her half-brothers before,
must be competent because she dresses better and has a larger income.
Who cares if the fruit is rotten underneath as long as the peel is nice and shiny!
Those who have accused DCYF of social and economic discrimination are absolutely right.
They do not understand that each person is different,
and they view personal worth in dollars and cents.
There are those who may have suffered much in life, yet their personality uses it as an opportunity (though an unpleasant one) to become stronger, more determined people. But not everyone reacts the same way, and there are those who embittered at experiences that they have had in life, try to
find solace in their efforts at making others relive the
very same experiences that they have so detested.
I know in what type of environment my sons are in, it is not a place where there is love,
where there is understanding, or where there are morals. A person who is capable of conditioning a
child to reject his mother is not a fit role model for any child, and can be rightly considered to pose a
threat to that child's emotional development.
I have been many times alone with my husband's granddaughters, and never once did I tell them
anything bad about their mother, though there was plenty that I could have truthfully said, given her past behavior towards me and my then only son (my eldest boy).
I am trying to do all that I can to free my sons from that nightmarish place where they are not loved ,without succumbing to legal traps and loopholes that are designed to rob me of my Constitutional rights. I know that my sons are suffering. The social worker only goes there once a month, though the other lady does pick them up everyday. Nevertheless
neither of them sees what goes on behind closed doors. It is because I know her and her sister's true motives, and because I know how they have been with my kids in the past, that I know that my sons are not well. The negative changes in their behavior and personality are more than ample proof. No person that wants to destroy the marriage of a child's parents can ever offer a save haven to that child. Such an absurd notion defies all rational thought.
However (except for G-D's help) I am all alone in this struggle, and it is my earnest wish to promote awareness among others. That others may learn from my pain and use it to their advantage. Together as caring and conscientious citizens we can fight injustice in this world.
While I was writing this entry my browser crashed three times, yet with G-D's help (Blessed be HIS HOLY NAME) I will keep pursuing justice.
The night can only engulf you if you refuse to light a torch.
Blessed be the LORD G-D of Israel!

Finally I Am Able To Write Something!

Tuesday, April 13th 2010

I have not been able to write on my CPA protest site for some time, ever since my two computers (my laptop and my desktop ceased to function) due to hacking. It may sound like a joke but the situation is very real.

Last Screenshots Before My Laptop Refused To Start

Since Mar 25th I have been using public library computers whenever I can come to the library, and strangely enough have been encountering some bizarre difficulties with those computers as well (though not as bizarre as what used to happen on my laptop or desktop).

Recent Occurences On The Internet Screenshot Album

I have tried to write on my blog many times and the browser keeps crashing, whether it be the firefox browser:

Browser Crashed on Apr 13th At 10:44 AM While trying to Write in Blog

or even on Internet explorer I cannot scroll down my blog nor write in it:

Cannot Scroll Down Blog On Internet Explorer Neither On Apr 13th At 12:11 PM

So it has been increasingly difficult for me to continue writing, and of course the publishing of my books and music have come to a complete halt. I have an unfinished philosophy book and a theology book that I never even got to start.

I will put another entry on what is going on with my boys, unless I encounter some difficulties with the Internet.

My Last Two Visits With My Boys

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

My March 18th visit was canceled so I got two weekly visits with my boys. One on March 25th and another visit on April 1st, just before my youngest son's third birthday.

On the last two visits, the lady who supervises the visits has been bringing packs of construction paper for my eldest son to draw on. Indeed, the little interaction that I manage to obtain from my eldest boy is when he is drawing, though I would say four or more visits ago he did not show much interest in drawing.

On the Mar 25th visit there was the same young lady intern that had been in the visit before that one. Wencito at first did not want to interact with me and hid in the toy box. Towards the final part of the visit the lady who supervises brought construction paper for Wencito to draw on. It was only like this that he started interacting a bit with me.

I wrote the Hebrew word "shalom" (which means in Hebrew, peace, hello, and goodbye) to see if he remembered it, as it has been so long since I've taught him. He looked at it for a minute but seemed disinterested, so disheartened I ceased to show him the paper. Minutes later, to my surprise, from memory, he wrote the word that at one time he had known how to write so well (he also at one time knew how to write the words sefer (book), and Torah (G-D's Law).

Wencito Wrote Shalom On The March 25th Visit After Being Over A Year Without Practicing Hebrew

Naturally I was happy, and greatly praised him for what he had done. He wrote it from left to right instead of from right to left which is how Hebrew is written. But nevertheless you can tell that he has still a basic understanding of how the word is written. If not for this situation he would have greatly progressed in Hebrew ( as well as in other areas).

What did sadden me (though I did not express it to him) was to see how Wencito's drawing skills have suffered severely in the unhealthy environment where he is in. This is a child that could draw well at three and a half, and yet now at five he draws for the most part scribbles.Of course my husband's daughters must do their best to discourage him from learning, and to even condition him not to learn in order to pass him off as retarded, and place him in Special Ed, which is one of their cherished goals. Funny how some people can cherish such pathetic things!

Wencito's House Drawing On March 25th

Above is shown the drawing that he did of a house. Please compare that to the drawing below which he did in Spain at age 4. Though I applauded him when he made this drawing, the fact is that when compared to the house he drew at age 4 one can see how his academic and artistic skills have been seriously hindered by the environment where he is in. And even the drawing at age four is mildly inferior to some of the drawings that he was making shortly before he was taken. No one seeing the March 25th drawing above would ever believe me if I told them how well this boy used to draw at 3 and a half. The difference is unbelievable in a sad way.

Drawn In Spain At Age 4

I think that by looking at these drawings, as well as some of the videos that I have placed on my sites of Wencito, it is obvious that he has suffered from specific conditioning meant to discourage him from learning. This whole situation is a personal vendetta that has been complexly planned by uncomplex and infantile minds (for to take anything out on a toddler is as low as you can get). My husband in the past(prior to all this) had told his daughters that I read to my boys, that I bought lots of books for them. They know how much I value education for it's own sake, how I had great hopes of grooming my son into an intellectual, and providing him and his brother with an excellent education. They are doing this to my boys in part to hurt me, as if saying "We now have power over your life!" (Wrong you two, for I know that you monitor my sites! G-D has all the power. You can smirk all you want at that remark, but you will nevertheless have to eventually answer for all your evil deeds), and also out of jealousy because in the past my husband committed the mistake of praising Wencito's intelligence in front of them.

Drawn In Spain At Age 4 Pic2

At this time he still wrote his name more or less well and knew his letters and numbers, though at the time of the above drawing his learning had already suffered somewhat.

It was during the Mar 25th visit that I learned that my kids are most likely in daycare ( having a mother who is capable of taking care of them) until 6 PM or maybe even until 7 PM. In other words they are there ALL day (Wencito's break from daycare is pre-school I suppose).

How do I know this? Because our visit was from 4 to 5 PM, and when my husband asked the lady who supervises the visit if she was taking them to his daughter, she said that they were going back to daycare! So they have to be there at least until 6 PM, and who knows if longer.

So that's the situation. I who am quite capable of caring for them and educating them have been deprived of my sons without an investigation for over a year, in order for them to be given to someone who has never loved them and whose only interest is in using them as pawns in a vendetta.

Meanwhile I suffer at not having my sons while my boys suffer from lack of attention and stimulation being in a daycare all day in the "care" of strangers, and my husband's daughters have more free time to make their anonymous sites (CibelesGonzalez.com was quite an achievement!),and for only G-D knows what else!

The following well researched article below written from a Biblical perspective shows how daycare can never replace a mother's care, and how in the long run it can even be detrimental to a child's overall development. There is no reason why my kids should be in such a place against my will, when I love them and am quite capable of caring for them.

Book Fragment On Daycare & Moral Upbringing Of Child

The April 1st visit was more or less the same in that Galileo on both visits interacted a bit more with me than Wencito but still seems to view me as a stranger. He does not get excited when he sees me, and listens more to the lady who supervises the visits than to me. Wencito did not interact much with me until some construction paper was brought, and then the interaction was only minimal. He would ask me to give him different colors of paper.

On the April 1st visit Wencito refused to eat what we had brought, but Galileo ate and drank fine. In this visit the intern was a young man rather than the young woman who had been in the Mar 25th visit and the visit prior to that one. We sang happy birthday to Galileo and Wencito drew a birthday cake with three candles.

I see them this week, meanwhile I continue in my struggle to fight this injustice despite all the obstacles, which serve to strengthen my faith in G-D, Blessed be HIS HOLY Name!

My Most Recent Visit

This entry was from yesterday but I was unable to post it because my time finished on the library computer, so I am posting it today with yesterday's date. I made some grammar corrections as I was writing fast yesterday.

Thursday April 15th, 2010

I saw my boys today, though yesterday I thought that perhaps I would not be able to see them, nevertheless
praise G-D that that was not the case.

What unfortunately occurred was that I became strangely ill after eating some leftovers Tuesday night from the day before, and was all day Wednesday from
early in the morning to late afternoon vomiting, and going constantly to the bathroom, the running to the bathroom (though not the vomiting) continued until today in the
morning.

So due to this, there was a time when I thought that I would not be able to see my boys, though my husband insisted that we go.

During this visit which had the young lady intern, my boys did interact a bit more with me. My eldest boy
showed some enthusiasm for drawing and tried some watercolor painting at the beginning of the visit, but afterwards was attracted by other toys.

Towards the end of the visit my husband was trying to
get him to draw,and as the visit was finishing he started coloring a bit.

The somewhat renewed interest in drawing is a welcome change for me, as it also provides me with an
opportunity to interact with him in addition to nurturing his creative skills.

Unfortunately I was not able to read to him some books which
I had brought with me from home for precisely that purpose.

The lady that supervises the visits brought this time a bag that contained several
toys, most of which can be classified as educational.

However the abundance of toys made it difficult for me to read to Wencito as he was distracted by them.

I did show a few words from one of the books to Galileo, who showed an interest in acquiring some new vocabulary and would ask me what some things in the book were called.

The highlight of that moment was when he made adorable monkey and lion impersonations at seeing the images of those animals in the book.

My sons are not as close as they once were to me, which understandably is a major source of grief for me

However on this visit I must admit that they did interact a bit more than me
than on previous visits, Galileo still interacts a bit more with me than Wencito though.

But still the way that they are now is totally different from how they used to be with me. I do not think that Galileo even views me now as a mother, but simply as someone that he sees
once every two weeks for a brief period of time. He was only one and a half when they took him away from me, so nearly half of his short life has been spent away from me.

That such a tragic thing should happen to any mother without an investigation and on the hearsay and fabrications of vengeful people is truly lamentable, and should greatly worry
anyone who values their rights as parents.

I will briefly conclude my description of the visit by saying that towards the end of the visit the lady that supervises the visits asked if I had been satisfied with the toys, and if there were
some toys of which I did not approve, to which I responded that certain toys such as the slinky had served as a distraction to I interacting with my eldest son especially, but that certain toys such as
an art set ( which reminded me of one that he had at three years of age) were quite fine.

On this visit both my boys ate all the cookies and drank the almond milk that we had brought, and at the end of the visit
Wencito did say to me at the urging of my husband "I Love You".

They do not show any sadness when they leave us, and Galileo says "Bye" to me with his little hand as if I were more a playmate that he sees from
time to time than a mother to whom at one time he was close to.

This shows how deep the Parental Alienation is, that they no longer perceive us as parents.

Tomorrow I have a trial at 9:00 AM. I don't expect much from a kangaroo court that is threatening to terminate my parental rights!

Kangaroo Court Day! Where Fraud Kicks!

Friday April 16th, 2010

I went to family court early in the morning, and spent most of the day in court as our case was one of
the last cases.

The interns that had been present at the visits were there,I do not know if the court
proceedings are considered part of their training.

It's possible that if they are training as social workers
they might have to gain experience in DCYF court proceedings. I don't know.

We are being threatened by DCYF with
having our parental rights terminated if we do not get an evaluation. However, given the erroneous results of my sons'
evaluations I have serious reasons to doubt the impartiality of these evaluations.

We still technically have not been given a trial nearly a year after our son's deportation from Spain, and nine months
after our arrival from Spain.

There was supposedly a trial on the last week of February to which we did not attend because we were never notified.

My husband's attorney said that he sent us a letter both to our home address and to our P.O. Box and that the letters were
returned to him.

Likewise I recieved a letter yesterday in our P.O. Box from my attorney notifying me of the hearing today, in
which he says that he had tried to contact me through mail and that the letter sent to my home address had been returned as well.

We entered the courtroom and were not allowed to really speak, but instead had to listen to the same old
libretto of how we need evaluations,about our kids having had health problems, and about the supposed "appalling conditions"
that they were living in with us in Spain.Including the shocking allegation that my kids were found in a profound drug-induced
sleep by the social workers on the day that they came to take them away. Yeah right! It was like around 10 in the morning and
they were both wide awake!

According to what I heard there are reports from Hasbro hospital on health problems that my kids
have supposedly had.

What was unbelievable is how these people twist things! They mention the fact that my sons are in the "care" of an adult sibling, but make no mention of the very REAL fact that it was these siblings that called the agencies (FBI, Interpol, U.S. Embassy, and U.S. Consul in Mallorca!) that caused
the removal of the children in question.

They make it sound as if the children's removal is in no way connected to my husband's daughters.Talk about partiality and cover-up! And then they criticize me for not trusting them?!!

(To be continued in second entry)

Monday, April 19th, 2010

http://www.thosefunnypictures.com/resize.php?file=pictures/5927/Funny_Pictures_5927.jpg
(Second Entry With Regard To Kangaroo Trial)

On April the 16th we waited nearly the whole day, only not to be given the opportunity to say anything, and to be scheduled to return in May.The judge did seem to interrogate a bit the DCYF lawyer,but still the proceedings reeked of kangaroo court.

After the "trial" we expressed our displeasure at what had been said in the "trial" to the social worker. The social worker told us that apart from this "trial" coming in May there will be another trial in which they will attempt (my husband's daughters must be tickled pink with glee) to terminate our parental rights.

How typical of those who work outside the law, despite their great pains to feign legality!

Have a trial that is completely different and apart from the May trial (that is supposed to take place in order for us to get our kids back) in order to terminate our rights before we can even make our case known!

That way, even if we win, we have already lost our rights without due process, and our already deeply traumatized kids either end up with strangers,or with two immature, vengeful half-siblings who have always despised them, and who will no doubt use them to chain their daddy to them so that we have to stay in good old Rhode Island!

These "geniuses" in child development have already delayed my kids academically, and have placed them needlessly in a traumatic situation, now they will further "help" and "nurture" them by taking them away forever from an "evil" Mom & Dad, in favor of their "angelic" half-sisters!

Well, I have to hand it to them. There line of reasoning is certainly unique! Faulty but unique!

As if this were not enough, when we were explaining that there had been no due process in the removal of the children, and were explaining the reasons why our kids should not have been taken from us, the social worker said,"Well, they've been out of your care a long time." As if the year and a half that they have been out of our care is justification in itself for continuing the prolongation of our separation!

This is twisted reasoning! And then they want to do an evaluation on us?!!!

Basic common sense dictates that an unpleasant situation that has been prolonged unnecessarily (we could have been given a trial much sooner, as the Constitution calls for a speedy trial by jury) should be ended as soon as possible precisely because of the length of time for which it has already been allowed to exist.

You do not remedy the trauma that a toddler suffers at being separated from his parents, and being giving into the hands of unloving people, by making that very separation perdurable.

This is as irrational as expecting a child to find a loving , nurturing environment in the bosom of those who fervently wish to see his parents divorced.

Yet this social worker says that despite the past indifference of my husband's daughter towards my sons, she is now "providing" for their needs. Wishful thinking or denial?

Well, I know that DCYF is materialistic (after all they are driven by profits), but surely this woman (my husband's daughter) cannot be providing for my children's emotional needs!

Even with the material needs, the "providing" is not so great with the cheap conventional food (I fed them organic) and the shabby clothes I've seen on some visits.

As for her actually taking care of them, why it must be a piece of cake to take care of two kids who are in day care ALL DAY until 6 PM or 7 PM, and who have someone from DCYF who picks them up and brings them "home" (what a home!).With such conveniences (for her, but not for my kids) anyone can claim to be competent. I used to take care of my kids by myself ALL DAY.

No wonder that she has time for all those sites that she has made with my name.

This agency has logic as twisted as it's unlawful motives!

But that is the undemocratic country in which one lives in, and I guess that it will unfortunately remain that way until people start giving a hoot, and actually doing something (in a decent, legal way of course) to promote and fight for human rights.

The poster below though talking about ex-spouses exploiting the family court system during nasty divorces, can also be applied to relatives, or to anyone who has a grudge and is willing to exploit these inefficient bureaucracies for their own vengeful needs.

Requesting That DCYF Allow Me The Right To Help My Sons Learn

Friday, May 7th 2010,

It has become increasingly difficult for me to write on this site with the frequency with
which I was once able to.

Some new developments (negative for the most part) have emerged
with regard to my sad and tragic case.

Time is always limited when I write on these computers,
but such is the disadvantage of lacking one's own computer. As a result I do not think that I will be able to address
the variety of issues that I would have normally addressed in a single day with my own laptop.

I am going to devote this entry to the letter which I recently sent DCYF this Wednesday May 5th.

Those who have seen my site are well acquianted with my ever growing concern for my sons' progress
(or rather lack of it) in learning.

It is bad enough to have to see my children (my eldest boy especially)
forget what they once knew due to an unurturing environment, and to have to see them branded with labels as a result of having to
continue to be in that environment. Yet now I am being accused of being delusional (I was informed of this some weeks ago) by DCYF
for stating the things that my eldest boy once knew and no longer knows.

I am accused of "imagining" attributes that my son does not
possess.

I do admit that my son has gone through some personality changes as a result of this whole traumatic affair, and
as a result of obvious conditioning shows little interest in learning. But if anyone looks at the videos that I have placed
on my site, and notice how excited he was about learning then, and how disinterested he is now, surely something must have happened to
cause such a change. My husband is a witness that I do not lie when I state all that my eldest boy once knew,so I guess that my husband
must be delusional as well.

Strange that DCYF does not consider itself delusional for thinking that my children are better off with
a half-sister that never cared about them prior to this sorry situation, and whom everyone knows wants I and my husband to divorce.

So according to DCYF's logic (if you can call that logic) my kids are better off with someone who wants them to grow up in a broken home!

Meanwhile I see my sons' each time I visit suffer from delays in their academic progress (not because of any learning disability, but because of
the environment in which they are in).

Because I value education greatly, and value even more any TRUE effort to help my sons obtain it, I have sent a letter requesting that I be allowed to have study
sessions with my sons on a weekly basis, to not only reaccustom them to my presence, but to teach them as well, in the hope that Wencito may
regain the learning that he once possessed, and that my younger son (who cannot even count) may at least catch up to some extent.

Before I paste the text of the letter that I sent I want to show one of the numerous proofs that I have of how I nurtured my children
mentally and spiritually, in addition to giving them superior food to what they are eating now (I fed them organic),

Organized Baby Cupboard Pic2

Organized Baby Food Cupboard Pic1

and lavishing them with books and toys.

My sons possessed an impressive library of hundreds of books (the majority of which now are in a storage in Spain). They also possessed a
different variety of instruments, as I was planning to give them a solid education with an emphasis on music among other things.

Wencito The Drum Player Age 2 Pic4

Wencito Playing Guitar

The Boys Toys Pic3

When my eldest son turned three I purchased an expensive piano course for children with the intention of starting him on piano lessons as soon a he
turned four.

I already knew that he had musical talent as at three he was already playing tunes by ear, and could sing well since he was one and a half(though not
with lyrics until he was two).

He already had a big high quality keyboard (which is also in Spain) apart from numerous books on music for children.

Wencito At The Piano Pic 2

I Surprise Wencito & Congradulate Him On His Musical Performance

I was going to spend his third year teaching him to write well, in order to begin teaching him how to write music at age four ( I am a composer so I am more than
qualified to teach my sons to read and write music).

Wencito Made A "B" Out Of Blocks

My sons even had a marker board with a musical pentagram that could be wiped clean when the child practiced writing
notes on it (this also is in Spain).

Thank G-D that I placed this course in their suitcase instead of sending it with their belongings, so that I now have it as one of the several proofs
of how I was a hands on mom and was trying to bring up my sons to be fully educated G-D fearing children.

Only a mother who values education would pay the amount that I paid for this
course. But I knew that my son had talent and wanted to start nurturing his musical abilities early. I doubt that he is getting that type of nurturing where he is at now.

Wencito At The Piano Pic1

Link to Page Of Children's Piano Course

Pictures that I took today with a scanner, of the course shown in link above which I purchased for my eldest son (I was planning on using it
with my younger boy too) when he turned three.

Below is the text of the letter that I sent:

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Page 1

To DCYF Supervisor,

I Cibeles J. Gonzalez, mother of Wenceslao Adonis Gonzalez III and Galileo Basilios Gonzalez,
am writing this letter to request that I be granted weekly study sessions with my sons ages 5 and
3 in order to see if I can help them catch up academically. My sons’ learning (as well as their
ability to learn) has been seriously hindered by this whole traumatic situation caused by their
1 ½ year separation from us. Though this request may seem unusual to your agency, I am
making it in earnest due to my continuing concern over the apparent delays in their educational
development that are obviously being fostered in their present environment. These delays, prior
to the emergence of this excessively prolonged situation, were non-existent.

The Boys' Vast Library

I see that my eldest son who is five (and who was taken from us at 3 ½ years of age) has forgotten
nearly all that he once knew, and seems to show little interest in books (indicating a drastic change
in personality), and my three year old son (who was taken from us at 1 ½ years of age) cannot even
count, and (according to what I have seen in my visits) does not recognize any of the letters
of the alphabet. My eldest son at that age could count up to twenty in three languages, knew all the
letters of the alphabet, and could spell words he saw written, as well as write some words himself
(including his name).

Wencito Trying To Write Age 2 Pic4

Wencito Counting With Daddy Age 2

Surely their evident lack of interest in learning speaks volumes on the intellectual fecundity of their
present environment. High quality child care should earnestly strive to go beyond the basic needs
of food, clothing, and shelter. The child’s mind has to be developed and constantly stimulated.
My children are being fed and clothed, and may have a place in which to sleep, but they certainly
are not thriving. They are merely surviving in the physical sense.

The Boys' Toys Pic5

Page 2

It is because of this that I wish to be able to exert my parental duty to educate my
own children, especially as they were taken away from me without any due process.

I find it deeply ironic that in the past, as a tutor, I was able to help several children learn,
and yet now find myself unable to help my own children regain the skills that they need in
order to become successful lifelong learners.

Wencito In His Medieval Themed Room Pic1

Wencito's Abstract Sculpture

I have taught Wencito in the past, so I am familiar with how he learns (each child has a
distinct approach to learning), and though he has gone through some personality changes
as a result of the current situation, I feel that, if he were to grow accustomed once again to
my presence, I should be able to teach him effectively.

If these sessions are granted I would need a visiting room with no toys to serve as distractions.
I also request that the sessions be an hour long.

I hope that this request is taken seriously despite the image of I and my husband that seems
to commonly pervade your agency. Our relationship has never been very cordial, but then again
you cannot blame us given the multiple civil rights violations that we have suffered for nearly
two years. This request is my effort to correct a worsening situation which I have had
to stand by and witness helplessly for nearly a year. Surely if the government can pay a
crowded day care center, where most likely overworked employees find themselves not fully
capable to teach each child with the level of individual attention that is frequently necessary for
successful learning, they can allow a mother to tutor her own children for free when she
obviously shows a fervent interest in their education.

Galileo's Gym Pic 11

In my opinion there seems to be no valid reason to refuse my request. One cannot say that it
would cause them trauma because they are already traumatized as a direct result of being
separated from I and my husband. I believe that only good can come of these study sessions.
I await your reply on this matter and hope that we can receive some cooperation from your agency.

Sincerely,

Cibeles Gonzalez

Wenceslao Gonzalez

The Boys' VHS Collection Pic5

Notice the educational DVDs and videos.

The Pseudoscience Tightens It's Grip On My Poor Abused Boys!

Tuesday, August 10th 2010

It has been a while since I have written on this site, yet I have not abandoned it. For months I was without a computer, after my last laptop got hacked, and as a result I had to depend exclusively on public library computers.I finally got one a few weeks ago.

I have been keeping a visiting log to document what has happened in the visits that I have had with my boys during the period in which I have not written on this site.

I will be (G-D Willing) placing the info of those visits in a future entry. For the past months I have been working hard writing letters and sending them to various agencies in the hope that something might get accomplished. My poor boys are still in the clutches of their disturbed half-sisters.Yes,their dream vengeance continues,sadly at the expense of my sons' well-being.

Well, now things have gotten worst, and in addition to the bogus conditions which DCYF has already placed on my boys (read past entries on this site to accquaint yourself with them)they are seeking to add two new labels: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder on both of them, and ADHD(or ADD)on my three year old! Which means that if they are sucessful in this sickening endeavor,my beautiful baby boy who is only three years old will be given dangerous mind-altering drugs that can inflict permenant damage on his health.

It is bad enough to see all your rights violated in a shameful manner, but to have to witness against your will the systematic destruction of your child’s health, by those who are professing to help him, I confess, is more than I can bear.

They are also taking any trauma which they knowingly have exposed my little boys to( when they placed them with someone who they know has never loved them) and turning it into a “disease” to maximize their profits, all at the request of my husband’s daughter ,whose “observations” are being heavily relied on to come to these outrageous conclusions. The documents that were given to me last week states that she wants my sons to be placed in a special daycare center that requires enrollment in an agency called KidConnect for children with developmental and psychiatric problems!

KidConnect Fact Book Link

I can never overstate how harmful the psychiatric establishment is to families and civil rights.

Just see below, at what many experts are saying, and I can tell you honestly that many of the tricks that these “professionals” do have occurred in my case.

They are nothing more than expert manipulators who twist everything in their immoral psychological games, without caring whose life they are ruining.

The important thing for them is to never be wrong, and of course, to make some FAT commissions in the process.

I thank G-D that HE has given me faith in HIM, and the independence of mind to make me immune to the type of conditioning that they practice . However, my poor sons are highly vulnerable, as they are so small, and cannot in their innocence understand the motives of those that surround them. They are easy preys for conditioning, manipulation, and abuse. My husband’s daughters have been trying to take away our kids for years. Since 2006 they have been trying to label our eldest boy with something. Anything which preferably will prove demeaning to his intelligence. First it was autism in 2006, now with the influence that they exert over this agency, they have become more “creative” with their labels.

Must the lives of two little boys be destroyed so that two old women, who never grew up emotionally, be allowed to indulge in whims born out of irrational spite? Must my marriage be destroyed, and my family torn apart?

I ask that all who care about human decency, Constitutional rights, and justice please involve themselves in activist causes to weaken these establishments’ toxic grip on society. I speak not only of the psychiatric establishment, but also of agencies such as DCYF, who hide their abuses behind “caring” motives that simply do not exist.

The links below are to create further awareness.

Downloadable Pdf Of Interview With Dr. Baughman

Second Link For Dr. Baughman Interview With Online Reader

Interview With Dr. Baughman Download Link
Dr. Baughman's Site ADHD Fraud
The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry Makes "Patients" of Normal Children

Lawyer‘s Site Speaking On Ritalin Effects

Trying To Remove My Sons' Most Recent False Labels & Wencito's Poison Ivy Experience

Wednesday August 25th, 2010

I tried posting this entry yesterday but encountered some difficulties in doing so. I nevertheless post it now, as I had saved the text.

Tuesday August 24, 2010

I am busy at present trying to see what I can do for my sons in order to remove them from the unloving home in which they are in right now.

Indeed, if truth be told, I am greatly worried about the potential dangers that they might be exposed to on a daily basis, not only because of the fact the my sons' half-sisters hate them , and so logically will not provide my
boys with good care, but because of the rampant lack of supervision that so often results when a person is in the charge of a child who they do not love and whose well-being is simply not a priority for them.

My sons are five and three years old, and at that age children do require a considerable amount of supervision, as they are more than likely to run into trouble if left to themselves. So it only deepens my already constant concern when I was told during my last visit with our boys on Thursday August 19th that my eldest son Wencito had been
taken to the Emergency Room because he got poison ivy.

We had noticed that he had sort of a mild rash, and were told by the person who supervises the visits what had occurred to him. We were told that he likes to explore, and that he was exploring among flowers and came in contact with poison ivy!

Now, I can understand that a child might be naturally inquisitive and that he might want to explore new things. What I do not understand is the lack of adult supervision that led to this unnecessary suffering for my
poor boy, who has already suffered enough as it is.

Though I do recall that the youngest child of my husband's eldest daughter (who is our main accuser and has our sons in her home) got poison ivy in 2005, I still do not understand where exactly Wencito was, as I do not think that a daycare center will have poison ivy near their building, and I doubt that there is poison ivy near the house of our main accuser. Wherever he was, he was obviously not being supervised very well.

It worries me, and it breaks my heart to think that he had to go through that ordeal without having anyone who truly loves him to hug, kiss, or console him. For a five year old who has been apart from his parents for two years, to find himself in an emergency room with strange people, and having
a condition as bad as this (though he did look well in the visit) must be all the more worsened by not having anyone on hand who truly cares for him. The level of discomfort
must have been great for him.

I was looking at some pictures of this condition which gives me a good idea of how Wencito must have looked several days before our visit. Just looking at these pictures, it does not
require much imagination to envision how great a level of discomfort he must have experienced before the poison ivy rashes subsided.

My sons have been interacting more with I and my husband on our visits, with the exception of the August 5th visit in which Wencito was a bit distant. There are some visits in which they interact more with me than on others. In the last visits they have come running to us, and they do greet us,
though this was not always the case. Nevertheless our relationship is not the same as it was prior to this tragedy occurring in our family (the unlawful kidnapping of our children).

Wencito (apart from occasionally drawing and lego building) does not show an ardent interest in learning as he did before. On my August 19th visit I brought with me my wooden flute as well as two plastic flutes for the boys, hoping thus to engage them in a musical activity. Wencito loves music,
and prior to his removal showed signs of being extremely gifted in music as he would at the age of three play tunes on the piano by ear, sing well and even make up his own tunes.
Given his intense musical past, I was sad to see that he rarely took an interest in this activity which before his conditioning
would have fascinated him, though it must be said that Galileo (my three year old) did take an interest.

It is evident that Wencito has suffered more in this situation, not only because he was older when he was taken,
but because since my husband used to brag about Wencito to his jealous half-sisters, there is a more intense effort to stifle his intelligence and creativity, as well as to discourage him from engaging in activities that might show his talent or lead to the further development of them. As hard as it is to believe
that women in their mid 30's would have such an attitude towards a baby half-sibling, the situation that I am describing
is nevertheless real, though I know well that many choose of their own will to sweep it under the rug, and so fall for these
women's act.

Because of DCYF's willing participation in what they know deep down inside is nothing more than a personal vendetta, with no legal basis, and that was brought about by a multitude of illegal acts and civil rights violations, the situation for my children keeps worsening. On August 5th during one of our visits the DCYF social worker gave us some forms to sign which I instantly perceived to be of a dubious nature. I told her that I would peruse them carefully before venturing to
sign them, and told her that I would let her know within a week of our decision. My husband did call her a week later but only her voicemail picked up. Shortly afterwards we sent the DCYF supervisor two lengthy letters with research data in a binded book of our making, and so made no further attempt at communication with DCYF.

I was shocked at the insinuations made in said forms, at the potentially hazardous implications of what was being proposed, and of the clear disrespect to my person which was
so clearly evident in these papers which unmistakably showed
the heavy influence of my husband's daughters (both directly and indirectly).

After all that has been done to me and my poor kids, I really do not think that I deserve to be shown such disrespect.
I have been the victim of a vicious smear campaign designed
to vilify me, my civil rights have been savagely violated, I have been two years apart from my children with no due process and for no valid legal reason (despite DCYF's & my husband's daughters' witch hunt and smear campaign efforts), and my sons have suffered from Parent Alienation, have been traumatized and conditioned, and have had several false labels placed on them which sadly bear the potential of stigmatizing them for life.

These are the forms that were given to us, I only crossed out with whiteout sensitive info such as our sons' social security numbers.

Forms Written On August 3rd and Given To Us On August 5th Stating That Our Boys Have PTSD & ADHD

This was the letter which we wrote and sent to the DCYF supervisor:

Letter Protesting DCYF Claims That My Boys Have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder & ADHD

The PTSD and ADHD are just the latest attempts at
foisting more false labels on my boys in addition to the others that have been placed on them.

So much abuse! That this could happen in this country is only due to the growing indifference that people show towards injustice (until it hits them of course). It is important to understand that what can happen to others can happen to us, and that civil rights violation precedents only serve to ensure a continuing future violation of more civil rights (whether they be yours or another person's).

I will be posting entries on this site, though I am busy at the moment with other things that I am doing for my sons. I ask all of you (anyone who might be reading) to please get involved in civil rights activism, in the hope that the undemocratic and unconstitutional trend that is engulfing this country be somehow reversed. For those of you who have had your children stolen by this horrible agency, it is necessary to join efforts in a civilized yet intense way in order to bring these injustices to light.

Trying To Remove More False Labels Placed On My Boys & Wencito's Poison Ivy Encounter

Tuesday August 24, 2010

I am busy at present trying to see what I can do for my sons in order to remove them from the unloving home in which they are in right now.

Indeed, if truth be told I am greatly worried about the potential dangers that they might be exposed to on a daily basis, not only because of the fact the my sons' half-sisters hate them , and so logically will not provide my
boys with good care, but because of the rampant lack of supervision that so often results when a person is in the charge of a child that they do not love and whose well-being is simply not a priority for them.

My sons are five and three years old, and at that age children do require a considerable amount of supervision, as they are more than likely to run into trouble if left to themselves. So it only deepens my already constant concern when I was told during my last visit with our boys on Thursday August 19th that my eldest son Wencito had been
taken to the Emergency Room because he got poison ivy.

We had noticed that he had sort of a mild rash, and were told by the person who supervises the visits what had occurred to him. We were told that he likes to explore, and that he was exploring among flowers and came in contact with poison ivy!

Now, I can understand that a child might be naturally inquisitive and that he might want to explore new things. What I do not understand is the lack of adult supervision that led to this unnecessary suffering for my
poor boy, who has already suffered enough as it is.

Though I do recall that the youngest child of my husband's eldest daughter (who is our main accuser and has our sons in her home) got poison ivy in 2005, I still do not understand where exactly Wencito was, as I do not think that a daycare center will have poison ivy near their building, and I doubt that there is poison ivy near the house of our main accuser. Wherever he was, he was obviously not being supervised very well.

It worries me, and it breaks my heart to think that he had to go through that ordeal without having anyone who truly loves him to hug, kiss, or console him. For a five year old who has been apart from his parents for two years, to find himself in an emergency room with strange people, and having
a condition as bad as this (though he did look well in the visit) must be all the more worsened by not having anyone on hand who truly cares for him. The level of discomfort
must have been great for him.

I was looking at some pictures of this condition which gives me a good idea of how Wencito must have looked several days before our visit. Just looking at these pictures, it does not
require much imagination to envision how great a level of discomfort he must have experienced before the poison ivy rashes subsided.

My sons have been interacting more with I and my husband on our visits, with the exception of the August 5th visit in which Wencito was a bit distant. There are some visits in which they interact more with me than on others. In the last visits they have come running to us, and they do greet us,
though this was not always the case. Nevertheless our relationship is not the same as it was prior to this tragedy occurring in our family (the unlawful kidnapping of our children).

Wencito (apart from occasionally drawing and lego building) does not show an ardent interest in learning as he did before. On my August 19th visit I brought with me my wooden flute as well as two plastic flutes for the boys, hoping thus to engage them in a musical activity. Wencito loves music,
and prior to his removal showed signs of being extremely gifted in music as he would at the age of three play tunes on the piano by ear, sing well and even make up his own tunes.
Given his intense musical past, I was sad to see that he rarely took an interest in this activity, which before his conditioning
would have fascinated him, though it must be said that Galileo (my three year old) did take an interest.

It is evident that Wencito has suffered more in this situation, not only because he was older when he was taken,
but because since my husband used to brag about Wencito to his jealous half-sisters, there is a more intense effort to stifle his intelligence and creativity, as well as to discourage him from engaging in activities that might show his talent or lead to the further development of them. As hard as it is to believe
that women in their mid 30's would have such an attitude towards a baby half-sibling, the situation that I am describing
is nevertheless real, though I know well that many choose of their own will to sweep it under the rug, and so fall for these
women's act.

Because of DCYF's willing participation in what they know deep down inside is nothing more than a personal vendetta, with no legal basis, and that was brought about by a multitude of illegal acts and civil rights violations, the situation for my children keeps worsening. On August 5th during one of our visits the DCYF social worker gave us some forms to sign which I instantly perceived to be of a dubious nature. I told her that I would peruse them carefully before venturing to
sign them, and told her that I would let her know within a week of our decision. My husband did call her a week later but only her voicemail picked up. Shortly afterwards we sent the DCYF supervisor two lengthy letters with research data in a binded book of our making, and so made no further attempt at communication with DCYF.

I was shocked at the insinuations made in said forms, at the potentially hazardous implications of what was being proposed, and of the clear disrespect to my person which was
so clearly evident in these papers which unmistakably showed
the heavy influence of my husband's daughters (both directly and indirectly).

After all that has been done to me and my poor kids, I really do not think that I deserve to be shown such disrespect.
I have been the victim of a vicious smear campaign designed
to vilify me, my civil rights have been savagely violated, I have been two years apart from my children with no due process and for no valid legal reason (despite DCYF's & my husband's daughters' witch hunt and smear campaign efforts), and my sons have suffered from Parent Alienation, have been traumatized and conditioned, and have had several false labels placed on them which sadly bear the potential of stigmatizing them for life.

These are the forms that were given to us, I only crossed out with whiteout sensitive info such as our sons' social security numbers.

Forms Written On August 3rd and Given To Us On August 5th Stating That Our Boys Have PTSD & ADHD

This was the letter which we wrote and sent to the DCYF supervisor:

Letter Protesting DCYF Claims That My Boys Have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder & ADHD

The PTSD and ADHD are just the latest attempts at
foisting more false labels on my boys in addition to the others that have been placed on them.

So much abuse! That this could happen in this country is only due to the growing indifference that people show towards injustice (until it hits them of course). It is important to understand that what can happen to others can happen to us, and that civil rights violation precedents only serve to ensure a continuing future violation of more civil rights (whether they be yours or another person's).

I will be posting entries on this site, though I am busy at the moment with other things that I am doing for my sons. I ask all of you (anyone who might be reading) to please get involved in civil rights activism, in the hope that the undemocratic and unconstitutional trend that is engulfing this country be somehow reversed. For those of you who have had your children stolen by this horrible agency, it is necessary to join efforts in a civilized yet intense way in order to bring these injustices to light.

A Belated Update On What Is Going On

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

I have not written an entry on this site since August 25th. I have been busy in all this time writing reports

and letters in an effort to protect my sons in numerous ways, from demanding that they get decent food, to protesting the false

labels that have been placed on them.

Everytime that I have begun a report, I have had to cease working on it in order to the respond to other actions of DCYF and participating agencies.

I still have a nutrition report which I have not finished (to demand certain kosher organic foods and supplements for my sons), and have been

working for over a month on a report refuting the most recent bogus evaluations made on my sons.

The unexpected delay has been due not only to my need to respond to several actions and occurrences related to DCYF (which will be covered in

detail here), but also because of numerous obstacles which have arisen while fervently working to defend my boys, as well as our trampled civil rights.

First on November 2nd our car ceased to function under very strange circumstances, despite having been repaired and having new filters and oil change

a little over a month prior to its collapse.

A day after being brought from the mechanic (to whom we had paid $212 for a repair job) it started

making a strange noise and at times would take a couple of minutes to start.

This problem was different from the original problem for which it was taken.

Our car is a 2000 Dodge Caravan which was in nice condition, and then from one day to the next the motor ceased to function (or so the mechanic told us)!

We have the further misfortune of living in a place where the public transportation is dismal,and as a result of infrequent bus runs it takes ages just to reach

any destination.

Receipt Of Letter Sent To DCYF Protesting What Had Occurred With Our Youngest Son At A Hospital Clinic

This, and the fact that on December 15th,(a day after I sent some letters protesting something that had happened to my youngest boy) once again my computer

broke down on me and has ceased to function totally.

Prior to ceasing to function it had been acting very weird.

Letter Written About Error That Hasbro Doctor Made With Our Son

I have only had these problems with computers since my husband's daughters (especially the eldest one called Ana Dickenson) with DCYF have been trying to pass

me off as crazy and paranoid in an attempt to justify their illegal seizure of my children without an investigation.

Ever since then, each computer which I have had has acted highly bizarre, and has then broken down on me and totally ceased to function.

It is now increasingly difficult for me to work on my reports, which is the only way that I can basically combat the numerous injustices done to my family, especially

now, as I have been denied even a real trial!

During the course of working on this site I have referred to my accusers only as "my husband's daughters", and in so doing I was providing them an anonymity which is

not deserved,considering how viciously they have slandered I and my kids, and how they have even taken out a domain name on the Internet with my name (as shown on the

March 12th 2010 entry of this site).

The eldest of the daughters (as stated before) is Ana Dickenson, and the younger one is called Leticia Gonzalez.Ana is the one who has my sons.

Because of her false accusations I have been separated for two years from my now traumatized and conditioned sons, without an investigation, and now, without even a trial!

A Letter was written a day after the Family Court judge decided that the December 15th trial would be the last trial, and that she would send her verdict

through mail! I had not gone that day as I was feeling physically unwell due to a temporary physical condition.

However, my husband had gone,and told me what had occurred.I lost no time, and a day after this sham trial a letter was written protesting our lack of due process.

I assure you that getting this report ready was no easy task considering that we now have no car, and since I have no computer once again, I had to make trips to the library

just to be able to type some simple text, which under normal circumstances I could have done at home.

This letter was sent on December 22nd to both DCYF and the Family Court.

Receipt Of Letter Sent On December 22nd To DCYF Protesting Our Lack Of Due Process

Receipt Of Letter Sent On December 22nd To Family Court Complex In Providence Rhode Island

Our Protest Against Bogus Court Proceedings And The Denial Of Due Process

This nightmare may sound like bad movie material, but as I have stated in the past it is unfortunately all too real!

The sad thing is that when one person's Civil rights are viciously violated,more people in the long run are bound to be victimized, as the site in the link below shows.

What's Wrong with CPS:Public Services You Can Dread

I will be (G-D Willing) posting a separate entry which talks of my visits with my boys.
On the last visit my eldest boy Wencito would shun me for most of the visit, and my youngest
boy Galileo had a bloody nose! His right nostril had dried blood in it! I am REALLY worried about them.

I will continue to fight this injustice through ethical means until I get my boys back who were stolen from me by the person (Ana) who now has them.

The May 13th Entry Which I Never Posted Before

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

I am using this entry to paste an entry written on May 13th, 2010 ( a day after our May 12th, 2010 trial), but which I never posted. Because I am posting this so many months after it was written I am providing proof of when the text file was created.

When I wrote this entry, I thought that we would eventually have an opportunity to present our evidence, but as the previous entry explains, we were denied a real trial.

May 13th Text Properties Confirming When Text File Was Created

May 13th 2010 Text Entry

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Yesterday I went to trial at family court where it can be said that judicial proceedings
have finally begun in earnest, and a pediatrician who had examined both my sons a day after they were deported from
Spain, testified on behalf of DCYF.

DCYF has dropped the neglect charges against us, and now has changed
the trial to a dependency trial, meaning that the trial must go on, because according to them both my sons have
"special needs" and are seriously delayed (yeah right!) in multiple areas, and as such are dependant on the state.

So now
the false labels that they have given my sons are the sole reason for which this trial now continues.

Such a web of lies has been spun out of this absurd case that it would surely make Pinocchio blush.

Perhaps the pediatrician may have detected that my children seemed withdrawn, as she said that Wencito was crying during the examination and did not
utter a single word. Yet any such behavior that is now being exploited to label two obviously traumatized toddlers with these non-existent conditions
are the result of all that they have gone through in Spain (they were being abused there for two and a half months) when they were taken from us on the basis
of fabricated charges of neglect which have now been dropped, and which would have never existed in the first place had there been an investigation prior to
our children's removal.

Among the charges that have been used in the past to link us to abuse is the laughable charge that I and my husband are in a cult.

The pediatrician said that the report from Spain said that we made our children do bizarre rituals!!! This of course has it's source in my husband's daughters
who said that we were housed with "cult members" in a house in Spain when they called the FBI, and are also responsible for that sinister little passage in the false
DCYF report which states that my children were in a drug induced sleep when the social workers came to take them away!

Of course, all this is preposterous, the only "rituals" I made my children do was to pray ( perhaps bizarre from the viewpoint of secular or atheist people)
and teach them Hebrew blessings when they ate or when they recieved something new like a toy ,etc.

I mentioned the cult accusation only briefly in my blog while in Spain,but rarely speak of it not only because it is so ridiculous, but because
religion should not be a determining factor in any child abuse case, and DCYF should not even be delving into a person's religious beliefs unless they are aspiring to
become a modern-day Inquisition.

Of course in order to violate our right to freedom of religion without seeming unconstitutional they have to make it look
as if we are dangerous people which is the reason behind the bizarre ritual fabrication and the lie about using drugs to induce sleep in our babies. Frankly, I think
that whoever is capable of fabricating these lies in order to victimize an innocent family is truly the one who is dangerous, and represents a menace to society.

I am a Messianic Jew. I practice Judaism and I believe in keeping the Commandments of the Torah.I observe all the Biblical feast days, and reject any custom from pagan
origin that has no Biblical basis. I do not believe in any wacky rituals, or in the use of drugs.I despise vices (smoking, drugs, alcohol,etc) and one of the reasons why I support
holistic nutrition and medicine is because I am even against the excessive use of pharmaceutical drugs when unnecessary.

It does not make sense to say that I or my husband would
drug our kids up when we have been feeding them an organic diet for all of their lives precisely to prevent them from being exposed to potentially harmful chemicals.

Wow! That's real smart!

ProtestingLack Of Due Process

January 24th 2011

It has been some time since my last entry on December of 2010.I have been

working on a good many things since then.

We still do not have a car, so

moving around is a burdensome chore ,especially as the region where I live has

recieved an onslaught of several snowstorms, and the local government here in

Rhode Island is very cheap and does not invest much funds towards cleanup after each

snowstorm. Nevertheless, Praise Be To The G-D of Israel, HE has given me the strength

to continue to fight optimistically enough against the injustices which surround me like

lions surrounded Daniel in the den.

Getting Ready To Go To The Stores On Jan 12th Pic 3

Because of the lack of fast, reliable transportation, and the time limits imposed on me by

library computers,in addition to other things which I have had to do, my entries on this site

for some time have been quite infrequent.

First, A Belated Update:

First I would like to state that after I wrote my last entry my computer (which had ceased

to function for two weeks) all of a sudden started functioning again on December 30th 2010!

I did nothing to remedy its dysfunctional state, it just started working by itself from one day to

the next. My computer IS hacked, and it continues to act highly bizarre,something which I continue

to methodically document in this new screenshot gallery:

My Computer After It Started Functioning Again On December 30th 2010

Second, I wish to correct a mild error which I made when placing a mailing receipt

(which shows a package that was sent to DCYF on December 14th 2010) in the last entry on December.

The receipt which I placed was from another letter which I sent to DCYF on that same day demanding

that my sons not celebrate Christmas. I got both receipts mixed up and put on the wrong one. This was

not an intentional error,and as I strive for accuracy on this site, I am correcting it.

Correction Of Error-Real December 14th Letter Receipt Of Report That Protests Error Made With Galileo In Hospital

The package which I sent to Family Court by the way (with the return receipt option) I assume got there

but I am a bit perplexed by the state of the return receipt which appeared torn in my P.O. box and with a somewhat

illegible signature which seems to consist only of two letters.

Return slip that came Back From Family Court To P.O. Box was torn and had illegible two letter signature

My last entries speak of the lack of due process which has been the hallmark of my outrageous case.

I wish to take the opportunity of this entry to further expand on what has occurred with regard to

this facet of our "case".

I went by myself on January 10th to the Family Court in Providence, Rhode Island which is located at the

Garrahy Judicial Complex at One Dorrance Plaza, Providence, Rhode Island.

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 1

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 2

I went there to protest the lack of due process which has enabled the injustice which has so greatly

victimized us to continue seemingly undetected and thus unremedied.

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 4

The court metal detectors at the entrance, unfortunately cannot impede the entrance of unjust practices

which apparently seem to thrive unchecked in this supposed abode of justice and legal decorum.

I personally find their website logo of "Justice, Independence,and Honor" quite disgusting. The only independence which

I have encountered there is the independence from morality and truth, and certainly they consider themselves

quite INDEPENDENT from Constitutional Law. They do not feel the least obliged to have to follow the Constitution.

Disgusting RI Family Court Logo-Hypocrisy Galore

I went to where the Juvenile Clerk is located and spoke with a lady, who after hearing a brief version of my

excessively complex situation, referred me to the sixth floor and told me to speak with an administrator there.

I went to the sixth floor where I saw a lady, and asked her where I could go to speak to an administrator after another

brief recounting of my situation. She pointed towards a door which is located to the left (from the perspective of someone

coming from the direction of the elevators).

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 3

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 4

I approached the door and spoke through an intercom to a lady, and after having once again given a laconic version of my

situation, a man came out and spoke with me at the doorway with the door open. I was not invited to go in. During the course

of our dialogue there were brief periods in which there could be heard the sound of women laughing from within one of the rooms (I don't know which).

I began by telling this man about the reason for my visit, how I was there to protest the lack of due process which is currently

responsible for the continuance of my unjust situation. I then proceeded to explain how our sons had been taken from I and my husband

in a foreign country due to the false accusations of Ana Dickenson. I explained that there had been no investigation prior to the

children's removal, how everything had been based on lies, and how Ana had also been involved in the deportation of our sons to the U.S.

I explained how we, having a lawyer in Spain, were denied an opportunity to continue our trial there (of which we only assisted to

one session).After acquainting him with these basic, yet often overlooked facts, I expressed my great displeasure at the sham legal proceedings

which I have had the misfortune of witnessing for the past year and a half. I explained to him the unusual court behaviors which I have

witnessed (which is described more in detail in the report which I wrote and sent both to DCYF and Family Court-links provided once more in this entry).

During a year and a half we were not allowed to talk or to present any evidence. During all that time the social worker(who also had

a lawyer) could speak directly to the judge if she so chose to, and had free reign of expression and action within the courtroom. She could

hand documents directly to the judge, and anything which she asked for was instantly granted. I explained how after a year and a half of

these mock trials (which cannot even in its wildest audacity claim to be Constitutional in nature), the Judge took advantage of my absense

on the December 15th trial (which my husband had nevertheless attended) to declare that it was going to be the last trial, and that her "verdict"

would be sent through mail!

Our Protest Against Bogus Court Proceedings And The Denial Of Due Process

Protest Against Bogus Court Proceedings 2nd Part

After explaining all this I was much bothered when the man with whom I was speaking told me, that it was my opinion that the trial had been illegal, to which I responded:

"Its not my opinion! Its the law. I was not allowed to speak or to present evidence."

I told him, how can a Judge reach any decision that bears legal validity when she did not hear both parties, and did not allow evidence to be presented in an equal fashion by both parties (only

DCYF could present "evidence", we could not). This man, which somehow did not seem to appreciate the shocking violations of the law, so clearly evident in my case, said that he could not go against

a Judge's decision, but that we could appeal and take our case to the Supreme Court. I once again insisted and reaffirmed earnestly that I and my husband never had a real trial, and that a case cannot

go to the Supreme Court if there was never a real trial to begin with in the local smaller court. He told me that I could explain in the Supreme Court that I felt that the other trial had not been legitimate,

to which I said most emphatically that it had NOT BEEN a legitimate trial. He said that he cannot comment on that as he was not there.

When I explained also of the difficulties which we have had with Ana and her true motives born out of the irrational need to see my husband alone and chained to her, and the feelings of displacement that she

felt due to the birth of our sons, the man asked me how old Ana was. I told him that she was 36 years old going on 37 this year, as her birthday is on August 11th.Perhaps he found it hard to believe that a person

of that age would exhibit the mentality which she secretly harbors. He asked me who our lawyers were, and I told him the name of my lawyer, and went on to explain the lack of genuine legal services which had only

served to facilitate the continuing absence of due process. He told me that I could complain and request a change of lawyer, but considering how this agency (DCYF) has exerted its connections and influence to

impede due process and deny us a real trial, I doubt that any lawyer which replaces the ones that we had, would render us any service either. The economic difficulties from the situation created by Ana Dickenson

has left us in a highly vulnerable position when it comes to having the necessary funds in order to obtain much needed services (through moral means of course) that might have the potential for improving the efficiency

with which we seek to safeguard our much besieged rights. In short, we have no money for an independent lawyer who will actually show some real initiative in defending our rights. The little interest which our lawyers

have shown in providing us with necessary and accurate information (so crucial for an effective defense) is clearly reflected not only in their passive acceptance of these sham trials, but also in the misinformation

given to my husband who attended by himself the trial of December 15th 2010. My husband was told that if we appeal, the process just to commence the appeal could take up to a year! In other words, after being nearly

three years in this situation, away from our kids, and without a real trial, would have to wait one more year (according to them) to even begin to complain about the lack of due process, and other Civil Rights violations

experienced thus far. What would happen to our sons' development during the course of that additional year that we are speaking of, living in an unloving environment with a spiteful immoral person who is obsessed with

destroying our family and our marriage? Each day in which they are in that place increases the likelihood of long-term chronic environmentally-induced academic delays, which are then twisted and misrepresented to pass

off my poor boys as learning disabled!

When I Went To Family Court To Complain On Jan 10th 2011 Pic 5

Considering this exceedingly grim prospect, I commented to this man how my husband was told that appeals are a lengthy procedure. This administrator told me that there is something called an "Emergency Appeal", which

is done in a short time. Of course, in the Kangaroo trial my husband was not (quite conveniently) notified of this kind of appeal. It is vital to understand that the key to continuing to violate our human rights, and the

yearned for success of Ana's vengeful goals is prolongation. Ana sees that after three years of this hell, which few would survive, I have neither divorced my husband (as she had anticipated), nor have I had the much hoped for

nervous breakdown that would facilitate false labeling. DCYF feels on the other hand that they have to salvage their "professional pride", and deep down they know that they have been party to a great injustice, and dread being

held accountable. Prolonging the situation still more (without due process of course) gives them the hope that something might occur(artificially engineered) which can then be twisted and misrepresented to make a case for them.

The law is being tossed aside, and the erroneous hunches of self-important individuals(who feel that their diplomas instantly grant them infallibility) are reigning supreme at the moment with the ever characteristic tyrannical

attitude that "might is always right".

In other words, if you have the power to do something, it automatically makes it the correct thing to do.

Also, as I have stated before, in this entry, each day helps them to "build" their Special Needs case for my boys, since they are in an environment where they are obviously being conditioned to exhibit certain behaviors, and

are purposefully being prevented from excelling academically, in order to carefully create artificial persona for them as "low IQ/learning disabled individuals". This is a lie which can have a negative profound long-term effect on their lives,

on how they view themselves, and on their self-esteem, as well as their willingness to develop their TRUE potential.This is something which Ana is aware of, and the negative effects that can emerge from these actions is, I assure you,

something which she secretly relishes. What worst type of child abuse than to take a beautiful, highly intelligent, sweet child, and destroy him in such a way, so that he can never have a normal life or discover his true worth, while all the while

masquerading in odious hypocrisy (to conceal a sick vengeance), and claiming that that child's developmental demise is for his own "benefit"!

I saw my boys on January 20th, and will try (G-D Willing) to write a separate entry which covers the visits of January 6th 2011 (which was my eldest son's birthday), as well as the January 20th visit. I continue to fight valiantly against this

injustice, even though I am mocked, my rights are violated, and these agencies seems to feel that they can step on me at will. But I know that in the end G-D will do REAL justice,and good shall triumph.It is only the knowledge that G-D REALLY exists,

and that due to HIS kindly governance, good will triumph at the end, which gives life its true worth, and fills the future with a garden of radiant potential.

My Meeting With DCYF & CASEY Yesterday

Friday (Before Shabbat)January 28th 2011

Yesterday (Jan 27th) I went to a meeting at the CASEY center where I visit my sons. At the

visit was present the DCYF social worker, the CASEY social worker (who is also the visit supervisor),

and the CASEY director.
I and my husband went to this meeting a day after another snowstorm, and

it was a bit difficult waiting for the second bus which we take to go there,as we had to wait in

the street because the sidewalk in front of a cemetery was totally unwalkable. It had around three feet of snow,

because apparently no one had cleaned up there during the several previous snowstorms.As I have stated in

my previous entry, the local government here is very CHEAP when it comes to quick and efficient

cleanup, and even though the streets may be clean, many sidewalks are still a mess.

I had gone to this meeting with no futile illusions. I knew that I would really obtain no genuine

understanding or cooperation from these agencies. Nevertheless as parents of Wencito and Galileo I felt that

it was important that we show our faces, and I also wanted to understand a bit more what these agencies

feel that they are doing with my sons, and what exactly do their "services" consist of.

What disappointed me was that I was not able to go away with a more enhanced understanding because their

dialogue consisted more or less of the same statements which they have made before,and though I

also made statements which were overly familiar to them, such as how we were denied due process,what Wencito used

to know, the trauma they have been through, and Ana's true motives (that statement really made their eyes roll!),

it is expected that it is they who should have more newer material for their dialogue, for the simple fact that

our situation has remained the same, under the same oppressive circumstances (with slight changes to worsening degrees),

whereas they have constant contact with our sons, and due to their infinitely more unrestricted ability to act,

they are not subject to the monotony which so characterizes reluctant impotence.

In addition, I heard several comments which are either inaccurate or purposefully designed to shield any

sign of Ana's poor care of my sons. The only reason that I mentioned in the meeting once more the utter lack of

due process which has enabled the injustice against us to thrive, is because the agency participants kept mentioning

the court, and speaking of a court verdict, and making it sound in general as if the court has all the power and

decides everything, and that they have no power or say in anything, which is an unpleasant distortion of the actual

reality, as DCYF controls the court, and any measure which the Judge has approved in my presence at those sham trials

were solicited by DCYF, and were not the result of the Judge's sole initiative.

While I am still mentioning the situation with the court, I was much surprised that DCYF and court are changing

the story. According to the DCYF social worker, my husband heard wrong and the trials are not finished, and we have a

trial in May! I explained to them that my husband speaks fluent English, and that he can understand when the Judge

says that she will terminate the continuance of sessions and send her verdict through mail.My husband even was told by

our lawyers that if we do not accept the "verdict" it could take up to a year just to commence an appeal. It is probable

that this sudden change could be to make us look foolish, and because of the report which we sent both DCYF and Family Court

(which link is included in the previous entry).The fact that DCYF knows exactly when supposed trials occur while we have no inkling,

just goes to show how serious and legitimate this "legal" process is. Trials can just be made and annulled at the will of

those who support our main accuser Ana Dickenson. She also briefly spoke that the Judge stated that there would be a trial in which

to deliver the verdict, to which my husband responded "What trial? I did not hear of another trial to deliver a verdict!"

Even if there had been a verdict trial, or will be one, verdicts cannot within the framework of legality be delivered until both parties

have presented their respective cases. In our bizarre case, it seems that even the right to know if or when there will be a trial is a

carefully guarded privilege. We were told that the Judge which we had had up to December will no longer be presiding over the court because

the Judges rotate, and we will be having a new Judge. So assuming that there will be a "trial"in May, it means that they have the intention to

try to drag this lunacy on into a fourth year (since 2011 is the third year of this situation, and nothing would be resolved swiftly if proceedings

drag on once more starting from May). Precisely what these agencies plan to do from now until May is the big question mark, since so many measures have been implemented

on our sons without our knowledge, or in some cases where we have been informed, against our will. Each day that my sons are in their present foster home,

is a day which deepens the possibility of long-term emotional and developmental harm to my kids. Each day in which they are there lends more phantom

weight to the fictitious Special Needs case which they are fabricating.

The social worker from CASEY told us that when the boys arrived after being deported from Spain, that they were found to be very underweight. I

feel that this is a way to cover up Ana for the fact that Wencito is still skeletal, and Galileo a bit on the lean side. Though it is true that in Spain

they went through a period of chronic neglect (after being taken away from us) by whomever had them, their condition did improve a month prior to deportation

(though they were still not experiencing high-quality care). Even if they were seriously underweight on May of 2009,that was two years ago, and if they would

be getting good care and nutrition, I think that in two years Wencito would weigh more than he does now. Since last year,when we would go to the DCYF building to

visit them, we have been commenting on the boys' weight (especially Wencito's). I know that my husband is slim by nature, and Wencito physically takes after him

in every way, but even if the child by nature is not prone to chubbiness, he does not have to be skeletal either.

They keep speaking of progress, that Wencito and Galileo are in a language-rich program, that they have grave concerns with their speech, and insinuating that

Wencito now has more vocabulary. I do not understand how a child who at three could respond in short sentences in Spanish and English, and knew words in French and Hebrew,

can now have more vocabulary when at age six he is only speaking English. Furthermore Galileo (my youngest boy) was taken from us at age 1 1/2 when he was starting to say words,

and spent several months until his deportation in a Spanish/Catalan speaking place. So of course, the change from one country to another, which speaks another language, in addition

to the traumatic circumstances that preceded and followed that deportation would impact the speech skills of even the most extrovert of children.

Even many adults, when they go through life-changing situations that are unpleasant for them, can see their ability to communicate affected, so why not expect it of small children who are at an age when they are totally dependent on a caretaker, and cannot fend for themselves?

The CASEY worker said that they are not being exposed to Spanish because it was decided (despite our preferences) that it would be better to only speak to them in English, because they say that my boys were hardly speaking when they arrived from Spain. Ana knows Spanish, but never wanted to teach her own daughters to speak Spanish, so she is definitely not going to teach my kids, especially when she wants to pass them off as learning disabled.

There are certain behaviors in my sons (especially the eldest) which I know are conditioned, and are being passed off as so-called "natural behaviors". They say that my kids have

to work at socializing, when my kids are way more friendly than Ana was at their age. Ana (according to my husband) was a very cold and unloving child, and had a tendency to be physically

aggressive with her younger sister, yet no one put labels on her or claimed that she needed help socializing. Considering all that my kids have been through, the fact that they are still

so friendly (though Wencito is now a bit distant from us) shows what a good personality they have. There are people that even when they suffer a lot they still retain a certain amiability

because of an inborn positive disposition.Ana never experienced the traumatic situations they experienced, and yet she was not a friendly child, so imagine how she would have been if she

would have experienced trauma of the magnitude that my boys have been through. When I tried to explain that it cannot be expected for two children living with someone who does not love them

to interact confidently with others, the rolling of eyes began, and the social worker to whom I was talking to smiled while he responded, as if taking the subject of discussion in jest(though his

words proclaimed otherwise). They think that I mention her motives solely out of spite, and that I am not speaking rationally. I do not deny that I dislike this person, as even the most virtuous

person would have great difficulty liking someone who has wreaked so much havoc in their life, and who is doing harm to their children, plus the Bible teaches to despise evil, injustice, and oppression

(Psalm 82:2, Psalm 97:10,Psalm 94:6-7, Micah 2:1,Amos 3:6,Proverbs 31:8-9,Proverbs 21:3, Proverbs 17:15,Proverbs 18:5),

and even like that I was still nice to her for a long time. I do want to see her held

accountable for all the atrocities which she has committed, but when I spoke of her motives at that meeting, I was separating my comment from my personal dislike, and explaining how these very real motives

which she possesses can only assure that my sons will receive bad care at her hands. A person's motives will affect what they do, and if she has such sinister desires (such as seeing I and my husband divorce),

and never loved my kids before, how can she be more equipped to safeguard our sons' well being that us, when her personal motives are in such conflict with the goal assigned to her?! You cannot use a person's feelings

towards something as an excuse to nullify the validity, or even the reality of the situation which provokes those feelings. Yet everything is dexterously twisted, so that every time that I state the plain truth of

her motives (in order to make these people see why my sons are not well off with her),and state how she has falsely accused me with DCYF in the past, they make it seem as if I have problems and am too fixated on her.

I never meddled in her personal life, nor did I ever harm her kids, I never sought to destroy her marriage,I don't have her kids right now (she has mine). I want to be far away from her, while she is forcing me to live in

Rhode Island through the situations which she creates.So who really is fixated on whom? Yet everything is twisted to make it seem as if I have some sort of problem because I state the truth of what she has done, and what

she is capable of doing. Of course, this is a careful psychological ploy meant to aid in covering up how she really is, since this agency shields her so, and is highly partial towards her. The question however should be,

who in my situation would not complain and seek to expose, the person who has caused all these problems? How can one effectively defend oneself against injustice and falsehood by never mentioning, and so providing a convenient

anonymity to the perpetrator of that injustice? Does such an unrealistic expectation even make sense?! How can anyone in their right mind expect me not to mention her when she has created this whole mess, and is jeopardizing my kids!

Her motives must be understood, in order to understand why she is capable of behind-the-door conditioning, and why she will not be truly loving with my sons, and if this is the case, of course it will effect the way in which they interact

with others. So if according to these agencies they exhibit a worrisome state of sociability, and such a state turns out to environmentally induced, no so-called service can improve what is constantly being reinforced by the persistence of contributing

factors present in their current foster home. Institutions can never successfully take the place of a home. Day care and pre-school are meant to supplement the home environment not replace it, and if they are with a caretaker who does not love

them (after being nearly ALL day in daycare and pre-school),then they have no home in the real sense of the word.

When I commented that Ana can put on a show for DCYF,because she knows when they are coming, the DCYF social worker responded that even if Ana can tidy up, there have been times when she has arrived earlier than expected, or later than

expected, and has found everything fine, and that she has seen Ana interact with my boys.First, when I meant putting on a show,I was referring more to her behavior towards my children in front of DCYF, than the house ( which prior to us moving to

Spain was not as tidy as it is now). As long as Ana has a good idea of more or less what day DCYF is coming she can prepare. I think that if she could invest the time to call so many people and agencies, and arrange the removal of our kids in a foreign

country without an investigation, as well as their deportation, planning for generally pre-announced visits should be a piece of cake in comparison to what she has already managed to pull off. Furthermore,if a DCYF social worker is there, and she knows

that she has to continue manipulating these agencies (who have their own agenda for supporting her) in order to be able to continue to keep our kids away from us, of course, she is not going to mistreat the child in front of them! However, due to

the way that she has always been, her concealed feelings of envy towards my sons, her intense desire to make me divorce, and personality changes in my sons, I know that bad things are happening behind closed doors. She has requested many of these "services"

for disabled children, has said negative things about my sons after conditioning them with the behavior which she is complaining about! Since 2006 when she was trying to pass off Wencito as autistic, she has shown this desire to pass off my kids

as something indicating poor intelligence. The CASEY social worker states that they know that I and my husband are bright people and that they know that our kids are above average intelligence, but the evaluation results tell a different story. Those

results would lead anyone to believe that my boys are of low intelligence, and given how Wencito has forgotten the majority of what he knew, and has apparently been conditioned not to want to learn, helping him regain his lost learning becomes more of

a challenge which each passing day that this situation is prolonged, and helping my youngest son to catch up, after having had the tragic disadvantage of having spent more than half of his life away from me in unloving homes will likewise be difficult.

The difficulty increases when efforts on my part to remedy it have been thwarted, by those who revel in influence rather than in doing what is just.One such occasion was when my request for study sessions last year with my sons was denied, because according

to them I need an evaluation to sit in a supervised room and tutor my sons! The meeting covered the topics described here, which I have conveyed to the best of my ability with the time limits which I have on library computers. We also did speak briefly

at the beginning of the meeting about my pregnancies (I do not know why that subject was of interest to them).

I asked them at the end of the meeting how they would feel in my shoes,and would not they have the same complaints as I, to which they responded that they cannot relate to being in my shoes,so that they do not know how they would react.

So ends this entry. I will continue to fight this injustice through ethical means,and Praise Be To G-D, will persevere.

Please hear my new protest song: "Rhetoric Of The Non-Existent" at my new online music store.

My Online Music Store (click)

Our Feb 24th Meeting At CASEY

March 2nd 2011

Before starting, I would like to announce my new channel on You Tube against CPS (CPA) Abuse
which can be found at this link: (click here).

My Moms Against CPS Abuse Channel On You Tube

Audio Files Of Visits (click)

I am writing this to speak of the last meeting which I and my husband had with CASEY on
Thursday, February 24th 2011. On this meeting the DCYF worker Heather Fogg was not present.
After two of these meetings I grow more convinced that no progress in the realm of understanding
is forthcoming, nevertheless my presence only serves the purpose of affirming the fact that my sons have a representative to defend their genuine interests (rather than what others wish to portray as their interests). I will occasionally deviate from recounting the meeting to explain the
nature of things discussed.

The meeting for the most part was with the visit supervisor, although for a part of the meeting
the director of the agency came in and was present. When the meeting commenced and only the visit supervisor (who is also their CASEY worker) was present, he stated that he had seen our sons that very day. We naturally inquired about their wellbeing to which he replied that they were well. That they both have had a haircut, and that Wencito's hair was cut shorter. He went on to explain how they divide their time between day care and school, and that they go to school for half a day five days a week. He claimed that the people at the day care, care for our sons deeply and really worry about their well being, and that unlike the previous day care in which they were in, which had the age ranges less sorted out, thus allowing our sons to be always together, their present day care is more organized according to age so that the boys are apart, and that Wencito has made friends. I thought of stating that given all the unpleasant experiences which our poor boys have been through that I would prefer for them to remain together, as a way
of maintaining some link of stability, but as the conversation drifted towards other related and non-related topics I forgot to focus on this important point.

Since I have stated in numerous letters which I have sent to DCYF (as well as verbally) that my sons are NOT in a nurturing environment,I am aware that there is a determined effort to sugarcoat their present situation and so minimize (or even totally opaque) the factors that are contributing to their present state, which is then in turn being used to portray them as something which they are not. I cannot speak negatively about the daycare personnel, as I do not know them, and it is possible that they are quite friendly with my sons, but as friendly or child oriented as they might be, any "nurturing" which they might provide pales significantly when compared to the authentic nurturing provided by a parent who loves the child. However genuinely amiable the daycare personnel might be with our sons, their interest in our boys is solely monetary, for our boys presence in their daycare (just as the presence of the other children)
brings them income.Both of our sons' presence in this daycare brings the institution around $400 a week.

The Cost Of Our Sons' Daycare Per Child

Furthermore, due to the unloving home environment in which they have the misfortune of finding themselves in, any positive experiences which they have in daycare or pre-school are counteracted by the what they are experiencing with
the person with whom they live (our main accuser Ana). Also,there is the fact that our sons are in a daycare for moderately to severely disabled children (according to papers that were given to us on August 5th 2010) when they have absolutely no disability,
only trauma and conditioning, caused by Ana (who was the one who maliciously requested that they be moved to that daycare).
I worry about Galileo (our youngest son who is almost four) being so small, and being separated from his older brother in daycare.
I have seen already how their relationship with us has been affected by the alienation that separation can bring, I do not now want Ana to destroy my sons' relationship with each other by exposing them to prolonged separation outside of the home. If they are
apart in BOTH daycare and school which constitutes the greater part of the day, it means that they will only be together when in Ana's unloving home, and how can brotherly bonds be strengthened in an environment where conditioning and bad intentions (no matter how skillfully concealed) are the norm? If it was Ana who requested that they no longer be together and that they be placed in a daycare for disabled children, given her concealed hatred for them, the decision cannot be for their TRUE well being.

Ana Does Not Want Galileo To Be With Wencito And Requested Disabled Daycare

Apart from thinking that its ridiculous that two children be a good part of the day in daycare (wasting tax dollars) when they have two
parents capable of caring for them, just so that a spiteful person can all the more easily indulge in her vindictive caprices, I know also that they are in the wrong type of daycare. However, I do believe that at least some of the personnel who work there, might be willingly cooperating with what they should know is a grave injustice. The reason for this justified belief is that on October 7th 2010, after having done some
research, we called the daycare center where our sons are in now (they were placed there last year) and requested to be allowed to bring some
organic fiber supplement for our eldest son Wencito who was constipated for a month (he still might be suffering from this condition as we have not seen him have a bowel movement since the Friday, October 1st 2010 visit (I keep a visit diary), and they told us that we, his biological parents, cannot go there! Why deny a worried parent the right to go to their child's daycare and bring him something which can only
promote his well being? The reality is that DCYF would never involve any entity which they think might ever contradict their dictates.
Since DCYF is knowingly committing an injustice, they must only involve those who are like minded. This is why all these agencies involved in this absurd case have no qualms about being party to the crimes committed against our family. Money reigns supreme for them, and the truth is that our family's misery is feeding many people who make their money from oppressing us and violating our civil rights.

What Occurred On October 7th 2010 Is The Following:

We noticed that our eldest son Wencito was constipated for a month and were determined to remedy this avoidable problem (by good nutrition) which apparently did not interest those who make it a propagandistic habit of their's to verbally express concern for our neglected boys. On October 7th I and my husband were at the Central Cranston library. I was working on a nutrition report for my boys' welfare, which I never got to fully finish due to
several problems which befell me all at once. The sudden lost of our car on November 2nd 2010 (it abruptly ceased to function under strange circumstances), the need to refute two evaluations done on my conditioned boys, and other reports which I had to singlehandedly write to combat each unjust and illegal action committed against us,my hacked computer ceasing to function for periods of time, and several snowstorms which made it difficult for us to travel without a car. All this, plus needing to keep an updated visit diary, doing what I can to systematically prove the hacking done to my computer, and other tasks to fight this injustice have kept me constantly busy. Nevertheless on that day I was working on the report, and I told my husband to call the boys' daycare to see what could be done about Wencito's condition.

It must be stated that we were never provided with any clear information with regard to our sons' daycare until some forms were given to us on
August 5th 2010 ( Ana's sister's birthday, and the first evaluation session date for both of our children) which we refused to sign. The forms were asking
our consent to put our children in a daycare with disabled children which we were opposed to. The children were placed there anyway against our will.
My husband called this daycare center (shown below) where the form said that they were before the planned removal to the daycare for disabled children that Ana Dickenson requested.
At the time we were not sure if the change had already taken place. We had refused to give permission, but we knew that they were going to do it anyway.

Precious Years Daycare

205 Hallene Rd.

Warwick, RI

(401) 738-0550

Precious Years(according to the August 5th 2010 forms) was a normal daycare with non-disabled children, in order for Ana's dream of labeling my kids with fictitious maladies and placing them in Special Ed to come true, she had to manipulate these agencies into placing my sons in a daycare for disabled children and condition my boys for the already biased rigged evaluations that they were to receive from a more than compliant DCYF appointed psychologist. This daycare on October 7th told my husband that they no longer had the boys,
and gave him this number (401) 739-2626, and stated that our boys were there.

My husband called that number and was told that our sons were not there. Since we had not been given in the August 5th forms the address of the new daycare for disabled children,

No Address was Provided Of New Daycare-Only Numbers And E-mails

my husband tried looking up the address but obviously made a mistake in the search and ended up calling a different daycare located at 2339 Westshore Rd. Warwick, RI 02889.

I then said that instead of looking for the address we might as well call the number provided in the August 5th forms: (401) 739-2700. He did so, but was evaded. When a lady (presumably Kelly Richman) heard my husband's voice telling her who he was, she instantly put on the voicemail and cut him off. Some time later, while I was working on the nutrition report she called from this number:

J. Arthur Trudea (the U at the end did not show)

(401) 738-7081

Call Received From Trudeau On Oct 7th 2010

I did a search on the number and found the following listings:

Crayons Child Care

3445 Post. Rd

Warwick, R.I.

Trudeau Arthur J. Memorial Center

3445 Post Rd.

Warwick, R.I.

My husband says that Post Rd. is about 10 blocks from Ana's house (this is his estimate, not mine as I do not know this area). However, he tells me that Post Rd. is long and he cannot be sure
if this number is in the section of Post Rd. which is around 10 blocks from her house, or a bit further down.

Notes Which I Kept Of This Incident

Notes Which I Made On Oct 7th And Kept Of The Incident

I shortly before writing these words did some additional research on this place, and it seems that the children which my boys are in daycare with might be really severely disabled from some of the
photos which I saw of disabled children on their site.Though these people state on their site that they deal with children of "varying ages and developmental abilities" my sons were placed in the disabled daycare.
It seems that in part the evaluation which began in August 5th for both boys and of which I received a copy at the end of October (the report is dated October 10th 2010) was in part done with the intention of using the final rigged results to either place or justify the placement of my sons in all these unnecessary programs to satisfy Ana's insecurity complexes, and thus nurse her feelings of displacement and envy.
For, children must be evaluated and referred to be accepted at Trudeau.

CEDDARR Centers Evaluate For Referral To Trudeau

Trudeau Center children Pic 1

Trudeau Center Kids Pic 2

Trudeau Center Pic 3

What Trudeau is for

I and my husband refused to consent to our sons being enrolled in this place. The August 5th forms did not even have my name in the Parents/Guardian Section (only my husband's name and Ana's name), so it is a fitting testament to
the lack of professionalism which abounds in these agencies, and how firmly manipulated they are by Ana.

My Name Did Not Even Appear On The Forms That I Was Supposed To Sign Only My Husband And Ana Appeared As Parents Of My Son

Back To The Meeting

The visit supervisor during the meeting praised the daycare, but even if the daycare staff are well meaning, the fact that they have daily contact with Ana, and are so heavily influenced by her signifies that it is all too probable that they will not act in our sons' best interest by listening to someone who does not have their best interest at heart (I personally think that Ana does not have a heart to begin with). Despite DCYF's intense efforts to downplay this very real influence which Ana exerts behind the scenes, I have more than ample evidence that her powerful behind-the-scenes influence is not a fantasy on my part.

Ana Has Daily Contact With These Agencies And Is The Main Shaper Of Policies Regarding Our Children

So,as long as these agencies and institutions keep listening to someone who secretly hates my children, they will obviously never do anything that truly promotes the welfare of my sons.

Daycares are not meant to replace the nurturing which normally comes from the child's home,and when it is sought as a substitute for a nurturing home environment, it is already with that act proclaiming the dysfunctional incompetence of what it is seeking to substitute. Furthermore this daycare boasts so much of providing good educational stimulus, and yet my youngest son who is almost four years old cannot really count, something which I taught my eldest son to do at the age of two without the help of all these "professionals"! Surely if a child is bringing around $200 a week to a daycare they can teach him to count, as well as teaching him his ABC's!Yet when I and my husband offered to tutor our sons in May 2010, we were refused our request, because DCYF said that we needed to get psychological evaluations in order to teach our children!Apparently no one seems to think that Ana needs a psychological evaluation before making decisions for two children whom she has always despised and envied,and whom she caused to be taken from their parents.
I guess that according to them, someone who has falsely accused us twice, takes a Gmail account with my name, pays people to hack my computer, and has made a host of stupid sites with my name (including the infamous CibelesGonzalez.com) is a-okay!

When I explained how the kids are not in a nuturing home environment the visit supervisor stated that Ana has a different "parenting style" than I do. First, I do not know how he can compare parenting styles,as he cannot accurately access my parenting style with the limited interactions that I have in my short and infrequent visits with my traumatized children. True, I put great emphasis on Biblically based religion, and a complete education
( which happen to not be very high on Ana's list of priorities), but if my children would not have fallen so behind academically due to situations created by others, and if there were not such an intense effort to pass them off as something which they are not (learning disabled), I am also capable of playing games that are less intellectually inclined. However, children should be taught from an early age that learning IS fun and not tedious or boring, and that all play should be learning-oriented with some goal of self-betterment in mind.To teach a child to value pleasure for its own sake with no practical purpose is to help create for the future an immature, hedonistic,spiritually dead, and ignorant adult with no true worthwhile purpose in life (even if he or she manages to obtain some level of economic prosperity).
These are my children, I gave birth to them, I risked my life to have one of them, sacrificed myself for both of them, so I have a Constitutional right to teach them these principles without meddlesome people getting in the way. I never meddled in Ana's life when she put makeup on her youngest daughter
at the age of three, or on her other girls as well. I never meddled when she fed her children junk food during their younger years,decided never to teach them Spanish, or dressed them inadequately when there was cold weather, so if I want to focus on Bible and education for my sons, I have a right to do so.
My reply to this comment on different parenting styles, was that with my kids being ALL day in daycare and pre-school,and with her dark sentiments towards my sons, I doubt that there is any time at all for any parenting. To this the visit supervisor said that its true, that they are not there for most of the day, as Ana's family is a two-working-parent family. The thought passed my mind to say,"Well, nobody told her to take my kids from me to begin with, and she obviously finds time to make sites with my name, and to hack my computer. She also found time to call different agencies and several people, to meticulously plan the removal of our kids without an investigation, and afterwards found time to plan their deportation."

However, I realized the futility of answering to his erroneous description of an obviously misrepresented scenario with those much ignored truths.

When I emphasized that even if she were in the house she would not parent my sons because of her feelings towards them, he asked me what was it that Ana felt for the boys. The question came to me as a surprise for he had never asked such a question before, but at the same time it appeared to me a question totally void of purpose, for I (and even my husband) have told not only him, but his director at CASEY, as well as DCYF workers on numerous occasions that Ana has never loved my sons, that she hates them, though now she is pretending otherwise for the sake of her vendetta. My husband continued explaining to him how she never has loved our sons, and the visit supervisor starting asking why this is so, if she has feelings of abandonment, to which I responded that she has stated in the past that my husband has abandoned her,and how she was used to getting all the attention and having my husband at her beck-and-call. How my husband, before Wencito was born, would babysit several days a week for her until LATE at night. The fact is that even though I was a newlywed, there were times that I never got to see my husband all day until he would come home after 12 in the morning! I explained how we used to take Ana's daughters out EVERY Sunday, before Wencito was born,and how Wencito's birth and the attention that a newborn requires curtailed that. How I stopped going to her house with my eldest son because of shabby treatment, but nevertheless continued to occasionally take her daughters out with my husband, and how after she falsely accused us in December 2006, I ceased going altogether, and my husband would continue to go by himself.
That Ana wants all the attention, and does not want my husband to be married to anyone. All throughout, I was thinking that he must surely already know all this. He asked me that if I thought that Ana in that sense had acted more like a child and not like an adult. I did not delve too profoundly on that question for I thought the description of the situation is in itself self-explanatory and answers that question.One should not seek to make a riddle out of what is too easily understood, though there are perhaps other, more complex aspects, of this bizarre situation that do bear some of the essence of a riddle. His later comments, which showed great
partiality to Ana showed that this sudden "objectivity" was not too real, but surely the appearance of objectivity must be for some purpose. He proceeded to ask my husband about his divorce from their mother and how they had taken it. Though my husband's account was truthful, he left out certain details which in absense of them
gives the impression that he was the one who walked out on their mother. The only reason that I say this is because understanding who really was at fault can better explain Ana and her sister's zeal for wanting my husband to remain alone, and also because their mother sent me an e-mail while I was in Spain saying a shameful slander on my husband (which I will not mention here), which leads me to believe that it is possible that she is blaming my husband for something which he did not do. My husband told Ana and her sister that he had to leave the home when they were small, but he left because their mother kicked him out, then brought another man to live with her while Ana and her sister were small, meanwhile my husband remained living alone for twelve years and devoted himself exclusively to them.It was because of his willingness to live alone all those years and only focus on them, that they came to expect that he would always stay alone to be at their beck-and-call. Prior to my husband meeting and marrying me they had destroyed another relationship of his. In short, they do not want him to have anyone in his life apart from them, so they perceived the birth of my two sons as a real threat.

My husband explained to the visit supervisor, how he would pick them up on the weekends and when the visit supervisor asked how Ana and her sister took that arrangement, my husband explained that there was no problem. However, the dialog was deviated from the root of future problems. If the visit supervisor was perhaps trying to create the impression that Ana has no problems because she seems to have adjusted well to the weekend schedule, he missed out on the crucial point. For she not only got used to the weekend schedule, she got used to seeing my husband living alone all the time, and that is what would wreak havoc in his future life. There is also the fact that my husband spoiled them and rarely disciplined them.Nevertheless, I get the impression that there is now the effort to make Ana seem as a victimized person,perhaps in an effort to justify her heinous deeds, and so minimize any potential for accountability. If such is the case, then I cannot think of a more ignoble scheme. True, she must have suffered when their mother kicked my husband out. But apart from that one sorrowful event
she experienced no suffering, she was spoiled by my husband, always expected to get her way, and got used to having never to face the consequences of what she did. Unlike my sons, who in their few years of life ( thanks to her) have gone through hell. Ana may no longer have had my husband living in her house, but she saw him every weekend, and sometimes during the week too, and no
one ever took her away from her mother for years and subjected her to abuse and trauma. Despite the fact that she was very cold as a child, and appeared to have no feelings, no one tried to put labels on her, or said that she had social problems. Everyone just said that it was her personality. No one tried to label her as problematic when she would beat up her younger sister. No relative of her's ever tried to do harm to her when she was small. Yet my sons have been separated from their parents for three years, were subjected to abuse and chronic neglect in Spain at the hands of a stranger whose identity was never revealed to us.They were deported to another country without us, and given here in the U.S. to someone who secretly longs to do them harm and who wants our sons to grow up with divorced parents as she once did.
My sons have been slandered by Ana (look at pic below) and Ana has exploited the trauma and conditioning which she has created in them to label my poor sons with numerous fictional conditions. The purpose is to destroy my sons' self-esteem and impede them from having a normal life, and from developing their true potential so that her bruised ego can feel better.
Since she believes that my husband valued them more than her, she now wants everyone to devalue them, so that she can feel good about herself. What better way to get revenge on my poor son, who according to her,usurped her place, and to punish my husband, than to pass off the child whose intelligence he used to brag to her about, as low I.Q. and learning disabled.

Ana Says Lies Of Wencito And Requests Daycare For Disabled Children

Though she might have certain issues from her youth which she never dealt with or overcame,her attitude comes from being spoiled and selfish, not victimized. I resent any attempt to make her look the victim. Other people have suffered way more than her and are kind considerate people who do not hurt others. Usually adversity makes a person stronger and more altruistic, not wicked, immature, and selfish. Apart from the divorce, she really has not known suffering, as my sons have.
Moreover all the bad things which she does are always done in a very pre-meditated, cold, calculated fashion, while all the time skillfully deceiving others. A person like that can never be a victim of others, they can only become the victim of their own evil nature.

Perhaps the purpose of this sudden "objectivity" on the part of the visit supervisor was to get us to negotiate with Ana while feigning impartiality. For he asked us if we were willing to sit down with Ana and her husband Tony to discuss our "differences"! My husband said that I cannot stand Ana, a statement which is absolutely true, though it does not accurately reflect the two years in which I tried to be civil to her despite shabby treatment. I think that most would agree, that only an abnormal woman would not despise someone who seeks to destroy their child's life. My children are the most valueble asset which G-D gave me, and I will fight to the end to defend them, for that is the Will of G-D, and because I love them. Still I am not a vindictive person, and I leave it in G-D's hands to give her what she deserves, though I will, through ethical means seek to have her held accountable for what she has done to my sons.

When he asked if my husband was willing to come alone to such a meeting my husband said no. Most likely Ana is looking for a way to start manipulating again with her good acting skills. She probably wants to use these proposed meetings to manipulate my husband's emotions and love for her, so that he will succumb to her skillful deceit, and allow her to get away with what she is doing. She also knows that if she deceives my husband, she can use that to create friction in our marraige, which she has desperately sought to destroy for years. The notion of negotiating with someone who has falsely accused you twice, who does not have a shred of honesty, and who is trying to destroy your children's lives borders on insanity. If a thief steals from a person's store. should the business owner negotiate with the thief, or
should the thief be held accountable for what he chose to do?
Can it be said that the shop owner and the thief merely have "differences" because the shop owner is angry at having been victimized? What precisely are the "differences" which exist between an oppressor and their victim? The only differences which exist are those of guilt and innocence, and those differences can only be settled by true justice which always recognizes the priority of innocence.

Too much concern has been placed on how Ana might feel, when in reality she has no real feelings, and too little thought has been given to how two genuinely sweet little boys must feel apart from their parents, and unloved by the person who has custody of them.Furthermore, any meeting which excludes me to satisfy Ana's needs of escaping accountability is not for the genuine welfare of our family as a united unit.

For anything which she does, and anything which she convinces my husband to do will inevitably affect me, and anything which she proposes will never be for the welfare of what she seeks to destroy (our marriage and family). I will not be a party to any such meeting, for such a sour circus would only increase my indignation at having to spectate Ana's nimble deceit tactics, and G-D tells us in Scripture that:

"Confidence in an unfaithful man in time of trouble is like a broken tooth, and a foot out of joint." (Proverbs 25:19)

Ana likes to play dirty, but she equally likes to play sneaky at the same time, so with her one has to have all the senses honed, and above all one has to maintain one's awareness in full vigor in order to avoid her traps. Indeed, I walk amidst a sort of engineered limbo, despite my certainty of awareness, between the luminescent shadow world of false appearances that seek to make the reality a myth of what cannot be accepted by those who turn the truth into a labyrinth. The difference between guilt and innocent is misrepresented as a mere difference of perspective. Lack of nurturing and love is a novel "parenting style". Everything is represented contrary to what it really is in a convincing way that seeks to blur the division between the real and the imagined in a way that is shockingly perilous.

The mention of Ana's daughters to opaque the truth of our sons' current environment, and the statement that they interact with my sons, in an attempt to minimize the severity of my boys' plight I felt was quite inappropriate. True that it was my husband who mentioned them first, by stating that they were the only ones who had shown any affection to my eldest son in the past, but that does not in any diminish the very real danger which Ana's intentions for my boys represent.

As I told the visit supervisor, my quarrel is with Ana, not with her children, who in any case are minors and cannot really do much for my sons. However well intentioned the girls might be, they cannot prevent their mother from doing harm to my sons, especially if she lies to them, and brainwashes them so that they will believe that she is not doing anything wrong.

The fact is that since Ana's daughters are minors and cannot really help my sons, their presence in the house should not be exploited in order to shield their mother from what she is doing to my boys.Her daughters could not prevent my sons from coming to some of the visits in ugly old, worn out clothes. They could not prevent my youngest son, Galileo from coming to some of the visits last year with strange cuts and scratches, or when he came on the Monday, December 20th 2010 visit with a bloody nose (I wish I would have had a camera then!).
Neither could they prevent Galileo from coming to the January 6th 2011 visit with extremely dry, knotted, and uncombed hair.The girls have not been able to prevent all the lies said about my sons, nor the false labels placed on them.They have not been able to prevent my sons coming to many of the visits sick. So why is their presence in the house exploited in order to protect their mother?

Yet I am ever surrounded by the constant emergence of intentional misrepresentations meant either to ensnare me, or to nullify the credibility of my truthful words. During the meeting I was perplexed to be asked once again about my pregnancies, and also by the CASEY director(who joined us halfway into the meeting) where I had lived during the time of Wencito's birth, when such themes do not pertain in any way to relevant themes.
They are not in any way related to the false child abuse charges made by Ana, which were dropped on May 12, 2010,to the trauma and conditioning which my sons have experienced in the three years they have been out of our hands, nor to this bogus "Special Needs" case which DCYF is trying to build with Ana's enthusiastic support. Their tendency to wander astray into such insignificant and irrelevant areas which common sense dictates bear no relation to the situation plagueing the present, nor to the grim prospect of its future consequences, only enhances the impression that in the lack of valid substance for a serious case, they are seeing what they can latch on to, in order to twist and misrepresent, and so provide material for their "case". I have already experienced this in Spain, when certain things which I said were taken out of context and misrepresented,
and I can assure you that that situation provided me with an eye-opening experience. When one is denied due process, anything is fair game.

It is truly bothersome to see one's credibility subtly and systematically attacked by those who promote that which truly has no credibility save what appearance of it they can procure in the perceptions of others by means of their influence. Influence is not truth, though truth has the ability to influence situations for the better. Among many of the other erroneous comments that my indignant ears had to bear was the recounting of my eldest son's fictional conditions with regard to balance and body coordination. The visit supervisor said that when he first met my son in January 2010 that Wencito's body was "waxy", that he walked on his tip toes (like a bailarina I suppose). I told him that Wencito did not have any walking problems, that as a toddler (when he was with us) he was extremely agile and could climb out of his crib and over his bedroom gate, which was quite tall in proportion to his height.If he
would have really had balance problems, he would not have been able to do these things, which most children that age could not do. The visit supervisor said that Wencito hopped if he got excited, which even if he did is perfectly normal, and does not signify an incapacity for firm foot walking. I told him that Wencito sometimes hopped when small but could walk fine and would not walk as he was stating. He briefly smiled, and I could not help thinking that the statement I just made, might be somehow twisted and misrepresented, to promote something of my boy which is not true. The fact that a child's occasional tendency for hopping is blown so out of proportion to signify a non-existent uncommonness in an attempt to mask the true insignificance of the occurrence being targeted, only goes to show how desperate is the need to latch on to anything in an attempt to build up a case. When the bogus evaluations of
October 2010 were mentioned which made mention of this supposed condition which the evaluating psychologist (I guess she's trying her hand at podiatry now) labeled as a "Gait Abnormality". Gait Abnormality is defined as unusual and uncontrollable problems with walking, something which no matter how hard these agencies try to engineer compatibility with, just does not fit in with my son's situation. He said that now Wencito does not show to walk on his tip toes anymore, and that
there should be a new report coming out for a trial which he first asked if it was in July, only to have me answer that the DCYF worker had said in the last meeting (on January 27th) that it was to be in May. I stated that he did not walk on his tip toes before either, and that before the bogus October 2010 evaluation was written, I did not witness Wencito tip-toe walking in visits. He would walk and run fine. I don't understand how a child can cease to have a condition which he never had to begin with. When I look unbelievingly towards my husband, the visit supervisor says "I'm not making this up! I really did see him walking like this." I said that Wencito walked fine. Even in Spain (I unfortunately did not mention this to the visit supervisor), during some of the last visits that we had with them, they would come running to us, and Wencito had no problems walking. Unless, Ana conditioned him to walk in a certain way during occasions outside of the visits (we never saw him walking as is being stated in our visits) so that this ridiculous condition can be fabricated, I really do not understand how this can be.

I think it likely, that since Ana knows that I am working on a report to refute these bogus October 2010 evaluations (which has taken me time because of other reports and tasks which I have had to do to fight this injustice,as my fight has been a multi-task one, and I am the only one doing everything simultaneously under ENORMOUS stress),and that I have obtained in the last two months video, audio, and photo proof that shows what I already knew, the psychologist is now trying to save face, and to make me look like a fool by making it seem as if these non-existent conditions were there at one time and are no longer there because of "services" which he has recieved. If such is the case its a clever scheme, though totally dishonest. My son in truth has received no real services, for he has less vocabulary now than at three, due to the fact that he is now a monolingual, and has forgotten a lot of what he once knew.My youngest son is also proof that these
so-called services are only a scam to squeeze money from Medicaid who pays for all these people to keep labeling my sons in their quest to "help" them, while they continue to live with someone who is causing their environmentally-induced delays through an intentional lack of nurturing, stimulation, and a heavy dose of conditioning. As mentioned earlier, my youngest son, who is almost four, cannot really count, and does not know any of the letters. So, if such basic things are not being
taught to my son, what is all that wasted money going towards? Are we to believe that since May 2009, when my sons were deported to the U.S.,no daycare or pre-school has been able to teach my youngest son his numbers and letters,when I taught him to count up to six ( I do not know if he still remembers) on our November 11th, 2010 visit within minutes. On that visit he learned quickly and would count after me, which shows that if he were in a truly stimulating environment he would know many
things by now. Likewise, considering the fact that our eldest son Wencito knows the alphabet and recognizes all the letters (though he rarely wants to write words anymore, and no longer likes books), why has no daycare or pre-school teacher taken advantage of this skill which Wencito already has, to teach him how to read, if they really want him to excel academically? The reality is that the only reason why Wencito knows his letters and numbers, and how to write his name and other words (though he rarely does so anymore) is because WE taught him to do all this before he was taken from us at the age 3 1/2 years. If I would not have cared about education, and would have never stimulated him, and he would have been taken from our house without knowing his letters, shapes, and numbers,one can be sure that now, at six years of age, he would still not know his letters or numbers, just like Galileo (who was taken at 1 1/2 years of age) at nearly four years of age, does not know his letters and numbers.

Ana was never going to teach him when her dream is to pass him off as learning disabled. If Wencito would not have been stolen from us he would already be reading simple books, and would know how to write in short sentences, since at three he could already write words and read what he wrote. Due to my awareness of what the real situation is, I resent any effort that is made to pass off the fruits of my parenting, nurturing, and emphasis on education as the present accomplishment of those who are now
not really doing anything for Wencito with their pretend "services". Anything which he now knows (with the sole exception of potty training) is because he learned it with us prior to his abduction, and what he knows now at six is only a fraction of what he knew before. The famous French writer Anatole France said "Nine-tenths of education is encouragement." Given the current environment in which my boys find themselves in, the future of my boys'education does not seem to bode well according to Anatole France's
veritable philosophical views on this theme.

Furthermore, I do not understand how that psychologist can keep writing these bogus reports to the kangaroo court that they have given us, while we are brushed side like nothing. I speak truth when I state that we have had no due process. A game is being played with us. The Judge had said on the December 15th 2010 trial that there were going to be no more trials, now after protests which I made, they decided last month on putting a trial in May (according to the DCYF worker) with another Judge.
In three years we have not been able to present evidence anywhere, while numerous measures have be implemented with our sons behind our backs, and against our will (such as putting them in this disabled daycare). The CASEY director who entered the meeting when it was halfway, after the visit supervisor asked us permission for him to join in, said that he is also an attorney (something which I was unaware of until now), and that the trial consists of two divisions, the first which according to him lasted until December 2010 was with regard to temporary custody, because the children were deported to the U.S. and temporary custody was granted to DCYF.Now, in 2011, he says permenant custody will be decided, whether custody of the boys is given to us, or to someone else. When he said "someone else" I knew that he was referring to Ana who was the one who planned their removal and deportation. Throughout this dialogue I felt much indignated at much misleading statements which I know do not reflect the truth,but I kept my composure, taking solace in the undeniable justification of my convictions. I answered back that the "temporary" custody trials had gone on for two years, and that we have had no due process. We have not been able to speak nor present any evidence. I said that DCYF had no business getting involved in a case that began in Spain (even if the accuser Ana was from the U.S.),that we had a lawyer in Spain,and DCYF at the instigation of Ana had negotiated the deportation of our boys. The CASEY director
said that the final part of the "legal process" is not going to take another 2 1/2 years, but neither is it going to be decided this coming May. He said that he did not want us to feel that we have not had any due process, and that we will have a chance to speak and present evidence. At this the visit supervisor interrupted, and said " So they will have another chance." Sensing a possible attempt at beautifying ugly circumstances, I instantly replied, "We never had a chance. We have had no due process. We never had a chance to talk or to present evidence." During this part of the meeting (discussing the legal proceedings) the visit supervisor claimed that they (meaning CASEY) were independent, something which I find highly unlikely due to the fact that DCYF would never involve any agency that would contradict their agenda. All agencies and persons involved in this lunacy seem to display the ever familiar pattern of kow-towing to DCYF mandates, and DCYF in turn is manipulated by Ana. Also, the visit supervisor, said with regard to the evaluations requested of us , that if it is court-ordered we would have to submit, to which I replied that such a request is unconstitutional, and that it would be foolish of us to submit ourselves to questionable proceedings before being able to defend ourselves,especially as DCYF is anticipating using the evaluations to build up their case as they lack any real substance in their case. The CASEY director asked questions about our lawyers. We explained how we had two lawyers,and that a legal consultation had revealed to us that such a recourse is usually ordered by a Judge when it is believed that there is a potential for conflict, which did not surprise me at all because Ana had created this whole situation precisely to cause conflict in my marriage and so destroy it. The director suggested that we request staying with the lawyer who had shown the most initiative in his job to represent both of us. The reality is that we have not had any real trials, and that our lawyers have not really done anything on our behalf. All this is a sham, if there is a "trial" in May (we still don't know the exact date) it most likely will be a rigged kangaroo court manipulated by DCYF. Laws have been violated in our case, as well as our Civil Rights, and a real court which will uphold Constitutional Law is contrary to DCYF interests if their intention is (and it obviously is) to continue violating the law by promoting and defending illegal measures, and shielding Ana from what she has done. Too many would see their agenda jeopardized by us having a real trial, so I'm not even taking this upcoming toy court seriously.

The CASEY director then asked if we wanted him to meet with our lawyer in order to give him information that may be of use. I told them I would think about it, but further analysis shortly afterward revealed that the action would not be too prudent, as they are inevitably tied with DCYF (our opponent in court), the visit supervisor has expressed his view in the past that our kids should not be returned to us because he thinks Ana is doing a "great job", and this whole trial business does not hold much promise of operating within the sphere of fairness. I have already in the past argued (not at these meetings) how the "temporary custody" that DCYF claims to have ( but which they really gave to Ana) was obtained through unethical legal loopholes, and blatant illegalities.It is outrageous that an agency can claim the right to obtain the custody of two children whose deportation they negotiated and implemented behind the backs and then against the will of the children's parents, who already had at the time legal representation, and were in the midst of a legal proceeding.The deportation itself is proof that
the removal of our sons without an investigation was based on lies and fraud. Ana knew that if the trial in Spain proceeded without interruption the children would have been returned to us, and the identity of the person who abused our sons would have been revealed (as the Spanish Judge would have ordered the Consell of Mallorca to show their records). If our sons would have been returned to us, we naturally would have stayed in Mallorca, as we liked the lifestyle there, so since the purpose of all this was for Ana to chain my husband to her while trying
to destroy our marriage and family, it was imperative for her to impede the completion of legal proceedings there at all costs. Hence, she called DCYF on March 2009 and reported us for child abuse four months after our children were taken away thanks to her false accusations in December 2008 through her Spanish contacts. This led to the initiation of deportation proceedings in April 2009 and culminated with the actual deportation of our children on May 14th 2009 (a day after they had seen us in a visit). Everything was meticulously planned in a very secret fashion. So secret were the proceedings in fact,that even the person who supervised our visits in Spain did not seem to know that the kids were going to be deported, and gave us a visit slip with the next visit day for the following week. The boys were deported the next day (May 14th), and examined the following day (May 15th) at the Rhode Island Panda Clinic, where their carefully engineered experiences in unstable events was put to good use in serving as the basis for placing them on the road towards their new pre-planned future as "disabled" children.

The period which was for the "temporary custody" decision consists of two years of sham trials in which absolutely NOTHING happened in 90% of them (with the exception of three trials in which DCYF affiliated people testified). In fact, the decision to give Ana our children was made before our sons were deported from Spain, and definately long before we arrived to the U.S. on July 15th 2010, so two years of sham trials were not necessary to decide what had already been decided before the unfolding of the American counterpart of this tragic yet bizarre saga.

However, the two years of sham trials were necessary to give DCYF (and Ana) time to implement all the measures that have been planned for the most part behind our backs.

All The Visit Slips Of Our Visits With The Boys In Spain

May 20th Visit Which Never Took Place Because Of Secretly Planned Illegal Deportation

Same Slip Photographed Above But Scanned

Visit Slip For Visit Scheduled For May 20th 2009 Which Never Took Place (Scanned Image Of Slip)

Before the part of the meeting described above (in which the CASEY director participated), we spoke with the visit supervisor on what the boys had gone through in Spain (particularly Wencito) after they were taken from us. The topic arose as I explained how the boys' regression in certain areas was and continues to be caused by the situations which they experienced after they were taken from us, not to any disability. We also explained how Wencito has been more affected because he was old enough to better appreciate what occurred and realize the
difference in environment that enveloped him after he was taken from us. We spoke of the appalling condition that they were in for 2 1/2 months in Spain while with an unidentified person. They had black and blue bruises every week, were constantly sick with a virus,Galileo on one occasion had cut lips, and on another occasion had an ear infection.Both boys were dressed in horrible old clothing. The Spanish social Worker refused to tell us who had them, and coldly brushed aside our constant concerns and protests. After relating this, the visit supervisor
said that according to the info he had, they had been in two different foster homes in Spain. We were never told that they were changed in Spain, but we nevertheless replied to him that it was only a month prior to the boys' deportation (from April to May) that we had seen an improvement in their condition. Their clothing was better looking and they no longer had bruises and cuts. However,such a statement makes me wonder that if DCYF (who surely provided this information to him) knew that they were in two different foster homes, can they know who those
people were,including the first person who was obviously abusing them? If such should prove to be the case, whoever shields the identity of that person is protecting a child abuser. We explained how we had gone to the precint in Palma de Mallorca to file a report, and how we had also filed complaints in the Social services complaint office. The visit supervisor asked if we had documentation of this to which we reported "Yes." However, when he mentioned the Palma precint investigating I said that they could not investigate because the identity of the person who had them during that period of chronic neglect was never disclosed to us.He started to talk how Wencito when he met him would cover himself with his arms as if afraid. During the course of this topic I sensed (my husband agreed with me afterwards) that there appeared subtle and indirect accusations in statements made trying to imply that we abused the boys. We stated most emphatically on more than one occasion that we had never abused our sons, and that our boys were loving with us and we with them, to which he would reply, "Now I'm not saying that."

Yet, when we stated that they were mistreated while out of our hands he said that he cannot know for sure what happened, so that is the same as indirectly implying that it had to be us. When I pointed out to him that if Wencito was doing what he described in January 2010 when he first met our son, then that just goes to show how unloving the environment in which he is in is. He immediately came to Ana's rescue and said, "But he does not do that with Ana, only with new people.", and went on to say that Ana interacts with him. I did not reply directly to this statement though I considered it a gross misrepresentation of the actual reality,and of course Ana is going to put a show for him or DCYF, the problem is what she does when there is no one around. Yet,I feel profoundly insulted that Ana who hates my children is considered incapable of inflicting harm on them, when there is already so much evidence that she has done so, yet we are easily and unscrupulously targeted, and I who was willing to give my life for my second son, and who sacrificed myself for both of them am painted as the biggest danger to their welfare!

I think that Ana is conditioning Wencito to exhibit certain behaviors which are then attributed to other causes rather than to their actual origin. In that sense she can use the very behaviors she conditions him to exhibit, as both a tool and a weapon in her petty vendetta. We have noticed (since we came from Spain) Parent Alienation exhibited by our sons which at first was severe (when we visited them at the DCYF building), but which has lessened somewhat since our visits at the CASEY building which began in July 2010. The Parent Alienation nevertheless continues
to fluctuate from moderate to minor levels from visit to visit, which only serves to strengthen my already firm belief that conditioning is in fact occurring behind closed doors.There have been times on certain visits that Wencito has pulled away from both I and my husband (and the visit supervisor has seen this), has refused to play with my husband, and has refused to hug or kiss me, sometimes he has refused to hug my husband as well (but usually its me). He was NOT like this before. He used to love to be hugged and kissed by BOTH of us. There is no reason for him to pull back from us, as he was not like that before with us, and we have never given him a reason to be afraid of us. When he pulls back from us he sometimes sort of smiles as if it were a game, but on other occasions he is serious and does not want us to show him affection.

Yet on other visits he has interacted more with us, and has even kissed and hugged me and told me that he loves me. So obviously he is being conditioned for certain visits more than for others. I don't know how Ana's conditioning schedule looks like, I can only describe the patterns which I observe from visit to visit (and I do keep a visit diary) and understand its relation with her mode of thinking and motives. Ana monitors all my sites, so it is highly probable that if I state anything which in particular offends her high and mighty sensibilities ( she thinks that she is untouchable, that she can do as she pleases and that no one has a right to be angry with her or complain), she will try to further punish me by conditioning Wencito to behave in a certain way for the next visit. I have observed certain patterns that would suggest this possibility. The visit supervisor spoke of the "fright, flight, and fight" response in relation to the reaction of Wencito which he was describing, and categorized it as an instinctive response. I did not openly declare my disbelief in this response which is based on evolutionist beliefs, as I did not wish to delve into the incompatible intricacies which place the Bible and Evolution on opposing ends of the perceptive spectrum. I belief that what is called instinctive is really an inborn awareness placed in us by G-D. In any case that which is instinctive will always be manifest whereas that which commences to be manifest is learned.

Example: A person will always blink his eyes, no matter what his experiences. The eye cannot be opened for a long time without blinking.

Any of these reactions Wencito displays (whether they be exaggerated by those who seek to exploit them, or attributed to erroneous causes) were not there before, so they must have been learned. Anything which is learned therefore cannot be instinctive. Ana has conditioned Wencito ( and to some extent Galileo) to exhibit certain behaviors and/or traits. To declare the learned instinctive is to imply that it has always been there, and if what is being described as instinctive is negative, it could be used to imply a problem with the the person manifesting it, rather than with his environment. The visit supervisor when speaking of Wencito before his removal he said "Now, I understand it that Wencito before his removal had some verbal skills." We responded that he could respond in short sentences in English and Spanish, and knew additional vocabulary in French and Hebrew, but that he was not very talkative. Yet for a three year old (which is what he was at the time) that falls within the range of normal, as boys for the most part are usually less verbally inclined than girls, and children who are exposed to multiple languages and
who are learning to speak more than one language (as Wencito was) usually take slightly longer to become highly fluent in those learned languages. This research on multilinguism and its impact on the speed with which a child acquires extensive vocabulary, will be discussed more in detail in the report which I have been working on to refute these bogus evaluations. In short, monolingual children do tend (especially if they are girls) to talk more, and have more vocabulary earlier, because their brain only has to learn how to process the rules of one language.
Nevertheless,we knew that Wencito was highly intelligent, and that he could speak when he felt like it, so the fact that he did not talk like a parrot non-stop did not worry us. Wencito's father at age four did not have as much vocabulary as Wencito did at three,and did not know all the extraordinary things that Wencito knew at that tender age, nobody put labels on him and he grew up to be a highly fluent bilingual. Of course, Wencito would in all likelihood be talking way more now ( and in more than one language) had he not suffered regression caused by intellectually stagnant environments and conditioning. Wencito still talks, and knows how to express himself (though not in highly eloquent terms) and can understand what is being said. He has no speech problems, he knows how to talk, but is just not very talkative, and also in part three years of separation from us, and all the hazardous factors associated with that separation (who he is with, lack of stimulation,lack of love, being misunderstood, conditioning, etc.) have taken its toll on him, as it would on any child.

When talking of the imaginary conditions which have been heaped upon my sons, the visit supervisor said in a courteous enough tone (though there is no worst discourtesy than that of speaking amiably to conceal a wrong that has victimized innocent people) that he knows that we have disagreed in the past vehemently with many of the things which he has said. When speaking of the bogus evaluations made on our poor sons of which a report was written last October 2010, he mentioned the letter which he had written, which had come with the evaluations by mail. He said,as he has already stated on several occasions that he regrets that he could not discuss the letter before he submitted it to court. The thing is that it was sent to us by mail with the evaluations,I do not recall his letter ever being read aloud in court (if you can call where we assisted a "court").He says that he nevertheless will stand by what he wrote. I suppose that all are entitled to their opinions (however erroneous they might be), the problem is when such erroneous opinions have the potential to destroy the lives of others. Individual liberties (as long as they do not violate the Biblical laws of morality) should not be held hostage to the weighty yet faulty opinions of others, for if civil liberties are to become slaves to that which is influential yet bears no real merit,then the personal happiness of many would fine itself threatened by an oligarchy which tyrannically enforces its self-importance upon the non-compliant yet consciously aware individual.

In truth the content of the letter which he wrote is provocative in light of the actual reality of things. I honestly say that the entire letter is faulty with regard to accuracy, objectivity, and makes statements which have no potential for realization under the realm of probability. Ana is praised in the letter for providing "stability" to my sons, when she has been an agent of gloom and destruction in my sons' lives, and has sought to destroy the slightest trace of stability and normalcy that could still remain within their traumatized lives. Firstly, she created all the situations which led them to be abused in Spain by an unidentified person. Ana also wants our sons to be constantly surrounded by children who are not normal (hence the request for a disabled daycare, occupational therapy for fabricated illnesses in a Rehabilitation Center for what appears to be severely disabled children, and seeing psychologists) and she also wants to place them in Special Ed. She wants our sons to grow up in a broken home with divorced parents, and has insisted that our sons no longer be kept together in the new disabled daycare, perhaps because of an unspoken hope to somehow diminish the brotherly bond between them. If she were to alienate them not only from their own parents but from each other, and then have them associate with disabled children most of the day, so that they will grow up with a distorted view of themselves, then her long-term destruction of them would be complete. Add to that the intentional lack of stimulation done with the pre-planned purpose of making our sons fall behind academically, and so create the illusion of them being stupid, and there would be enough long-term emotional and intellectual damage to last a lifetime.

No doubt that is what her putrid heart secretly yearns for. So the notion of Ana bringing stability to my boys would be extremely laughable if it were not for the tragedy which counteracts that typical reaction toward unbridled folly. The day that Ana brings stability into my boys' lives is the day that one will see a cow jumping over the moon!

For those gullible individuals who may think that I am a pessimist with an overactive imagination, I can only say the following in my defense:

1) I base my assessment of their ( Ana and her sister) frightful mentality on what I have seen them do (whether to me, to my sons, or to others), and on what I accurately know that they are capable of doing.

2) I and my sons are not the only people which Ana and her sister have victimized with slander and false accusations. They have made it almost a habit of using government agencies to get back at those whom they dislike. Hey! Its cheap (the government pays for the vendetta), and they can still save face and pretend to be something else.

3) Despite having attained a certain level of economic prosperity (thanks to the help of my husband) they are totally devoid of maturity, and are not guided by moral principles but by caprices,complexes, unfounded animosity, and vanity. They were excessively spoiled in their youth and seldom reprimanded, and really believe that they are entitled to doing whatever they want without ever having to render account to anyone.

4) I have evidence of all that she has done to us, so no one can say that this is imaginary, despite the good show Ana may give for DCYF.

No, I am not a pessimist, I am a realist, but when one is a realist proclaiming an unwanted reality, one becomes part of a very lonely club, and mockery becomes the order of the day, when those frightened of what they do not want to see believe that with a cynical smirk the shadow of concealed error can be appeased into invisibility. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

In this letter (of which a portion is shown below) one can see numerous attempts to place non-existent conditions on our sons.Not satisfied with the supposed learning disabilities,they now endeavor through subtle and cautious statements with inevitably heinous implications to suggest and make others believe that our sons also have physical problems which require the benefit of "services" (more fleecing money from Medicaid).

Wencito And Galileo Are Also Assessed By An Occupational Therapist As If They Had Physical Problems As Well

It seems that they are trying to label my poor boy Wencito, in particular with some Sensory Intergration dysfunction. The visit supervisor spoke of Sensory Integration, I had done research on it prior to his mentioning as I have been writing a report to refute these absurd allegations.I nevertheless did not want to enter into a debate on a fictitious condition which was fabricated in the 1960's and which still remains controversial, and arouses much skepticism on the part of neurologists. The term Sensory Integration was invented by a psychologist ( not a neurologist) by the name of Anna Jean Ayres.Supposedly it describes the inability to distinguish between sensory experiences such as sight, taste, touch, sound,smell, body awareness, movement, and the pull of gravity.This is absolutely insane. Neither of my sons have problems with their five senses, nor have problems walking, running, or using their physical bodies.

Wencito was super strong and agile before he was stolen from us.On this very site a picture of Wencito climbing out of his crib at 18 months can be viewed (under the Tuesday, November 24th 2009 entry) . Galileo was also very strong and would climb out of his crib at a year old. I have noticed that those who love the game of diagnosis making but dread the prospect of being shown to be in error have this seemingly unfailing tendency to come out with the queerest, most rare and unheard of maladies. Why have my boys been chosen to receive such strange diseases? The majority of the labels which have been placed upon my sons are rare almost unheard of conditions. Could it be because the rarer and the least known the condition is, the more difficult to disprove (or so they believe)? Above, is a portion of a letter speaking about physical therapy "services" which my sons (especially Wencito) supposedly need. They are being taken to the rehabilitation center whose photo is shown below, and as can be seen the children who go there appear to be severely disabled.

The Sargent Rehabilitation Center Where They Sent My Poor Boys In Order To Put More Labels On Them

The visit supervisor kept talking about Wencito's body being "waxy", how he needed help in stimulation and in a sense of balance. I listened with the patience that tests those who most go through the indignant ordeal of bearing that which is unacceptable yet inescapable, while all the time stating most emphatically that my son has no physical problems. I have not noticed him to have any physical problems in any of the visits save that of frequent illness in the realm of viruses,due to exceedingly poor nutrition. If ever he might have appeared to be physically uncoordinated ( I have not witnessed that) it could very well be to a chronic deficiency of nutrients, so a much wiser recourse would be to stop stripping Medicaid with unneeded funds for make-believe conditions, and rather invest in organic kosher nutrition which does wonders for balance, focus, and memory. I know that his diet with Ana must be very poor, as nutrition was never her forte, and her unfortunate daughters were constantly sick during their first years of life.

Towards the end of the meeting the visit supervisor said that he likes us (I think he likes Ana), and that he has seen our committment to our children which is not that common in others, and that we always assist to all our visits and meetings. I know that we are good parents, and we do not need others to state that for it to be so, just as Ana does not need others to state that she is a bad foster mother for it to be so . Things are what they are, whether we choose to perceive them correctly or not. However, if he really does think this of us, then it makes his stance with regard to that provocative letter
which states that we should not be given back our children because it would cause a "disruption" in their lives, all the more enigmatic.

Belated Entry On January 6th 2011 Visit

March 3rd, 2011

I wrote the text entry shown below on January 25th, but was never able to post it. I am posting it now, because even though I have a visit diary which I maintain, I want to keep a record ( even if it is in a slightly more condensed form than my diary) on this site of my visits, and the media which can be added to the site entries give it more depth than the written words on a diary page alone. However, I always have so much to do in my lonely fight against this injustice, and the hacking on my computer is severe, that at times its difficult to keep everything adequately updated. When I cannot immediately post a text, I save it to post later on.
The text below is 97% as it was on January 25th when I wrote it. I only edited links, and some references to those links. The situation described below, of the boys' condition during the January 6th visit, has somewhat improved. On January 20th they came
with very old worn out clothing, and Galileo's shirt that day had even mild traces of pink in
the design, but that will be discussed in another entry which deals with the Jan 20th visit.
The links that were originally in the below text were edited by me. The reason for this was that
the links which were originally provided were not functional, because almost all of my uploads to Image shack automatically failed, and since afterwards I was able to upload some videos elsewhere, I provide instead those videos.
To better understand how virtually all of my video uploads failed to convert, please visit this gallery
(click here) which shows screenshots that prove the consistent blockage that I experience when trying to upload videos. Either I am blocked, or my hacked computer goes haywire to prevent me from doing what I have to do. If the removed links are still mentioned in some areas of the text, its because I tried to edit the text as minimally as possible, so that it will remain more or less in its original state.

January 25th, 2011

It seems that my life here, just keeps getting weirder and weirder.Last night after I left the library where I posted my Jan 24th entry,I went to the bus stop. I was expecting to have a quick smooth ride home on the bus (despite the bitter cold which I knew I would experience while waiting for the bus).

The bus came (a little later than expected, but it did not take so long) and I stepped in with my husband, and we both sat down. I noticed that the majority of the people on the bus were acting a bit weird. One guy in front of us took out a cell phone and started cursing a lot (using the F word incessantly). Some passengers at the back part of the bus became very rowdy.

I and my husband were sitting on the bus seats which face towards the walking space within the bus (not the seats where one stares out the window).So we were facing anyone who walked up and down the bus. All of a sudden this group of rowdy foul-mouthed passengers became even more
irksome. One of these men swiftly came and stood extremely close to me (even though there was more than enough free space in the walkway) while arguing with another passenger. He lifted up both hands in the typical "you want to fight?" gesture. Due to his extreme proximity to me when he did this gesture, his left hand for a fraction of a second mildly hit me (it was softly done & did not hurt at all) in the area of my face where my nose and mouth is located.

January 24th 2011 -Loony RIPTA-Pic 2 (Wacky Times In Rhode Island)

It all happened so fast that my husband had not realized that I had been touched,as he was also saying to the obviously troubled individual in a bothered tone, "Please! Please!" This all took me a bit by surprise, as I was writing when I felt this man's hand touch my face in the area described. There ended up being no fight on the bus.
I commented to my husband that this perhaps should be filmed, but when I took out my video camera the ruckus subsided.
I nevertheless got to film a minute of footage which shows the person who had mildly hit me, much relaxed sitting on his seat. Nevertheless in that minute of footage, a passenger in the rear part of the bus can still be heard cursing for several seconds. I decided to add the screenshots of the video under a new title "Looney RIPTA".
RIPTA stands for "Rhode Island Public Transportation Authority".

VISITS (Brief Summaries):

I keep a Visit log where I record all that occurs on the visits.However, I often write several pages for each visit, so sometimes I will try to condense and put the most necessary details, as I always have limited time when I post entries.

January 6th, 2011

We arrived early at this visit, and waited for some time in the waiting area (shown below). While we were waiting there, a lady who works there (but whom we have not seen before) started conversing with us about Puerto Rico. Towards the end of our brief conversation she said that at the beginning of our sons' involvement with that center our eldest son used to talk to her in Spanish, but not anymore. This reflects the sad reality that in addition to the academic delays which are being conditioned into our boys, our sons are also against our will being turned into monolinguals.

Our main accuser Ana did not want to teach Spanish to her three daughters, nor did she ever show the desire to hear them speak in Spanish, but
at least that was her choice (however erroneous it might be). We have protested the fact that they now only have vocabulary in one language. Our youngest boy which was taken from us at the age of 1 1/2 years knows no Spanish at all. For someone like me, who bought imported children's books from other countries in other languages, and had children's DVDs for them in Spanish, French, and Hebrew, with the idea of teaching them to read in several languages,my sons' enforced monolingualism is a bitter pill to swallow (smile Ana! you like that, don't you. I know you read my sites).

CASEY Building Where We Visit

On this day we brought our eldest son Wencito who turned six a Boston Creme Cake with candles which we lit in the visiting room.

Jan 6th Visit: Wencitos Cake Pic 2

We had gone to the visit with presents for both Wencito and Galileo. Wencito was given two art toys,
and Galileo was given a stuffed bat with an accompanying storybook as well as a musical set which consisted of several percussion instruments.

Jan 6th Visit: One Of Wencitos Art Gifts

Jan 6th Visit: Galileo's Musical Gift

During this visit I was pleasantly surprised to see Wencito interacting way more with us than he had done on the previous visit, though he still exhibits certain behaviors and attitudes ( such as his disdain for non-art learning activities) which I know have been conditioned into him by Ana to pass him off as something which he is not.

(click here to hear audio of boys eating cake on Jan 6th and see additional media)

( I apologize for the brief separate videos, but firstly my digital camera has limited storage capacity, and then everytime that I try to join short videos on my laptop into a single video,the laptop starts acting up and the joined video files come out corrupt. Weird, but true.

I took short video clips and pictures of the boys, but had to stop occasionally to tend to them, and also I needed to take time to do activities with them (which I was able to do more than on the January 20th visit, when Wencito once again hardly interacted with us).
On this visit both boys were coughing at times (Galileo more than Wencito). Galileo's hair looked very unkept and uncombed towards the back part of the head,and VERY dry. As farfetched as this might sound to those who feel that they have some need to defend her for whatever reason (whether it be willing blindness or seeing their own personal agenda at stake),it is a grave concern of mine that because Galileo looks just like me, and my main accuser Ana is so obsessed with doing me harm, and Galileo being the nearest thing to having me near her, that her irrational vindictive hatred might lead her to single him out for more neglect and mistreatment.Given the way that she thinks, its a rational conclusion. If it seems irrational to anyone, its only because that person is in denial, and does not want to accept how she really is, preferring instead to be taken in by her performance. Others may laugh at this concern, but that does not in any way demote its validity, and it is a worrisome possibility which is ever burdening me with more stress.Furthermore, whoever rolls their eyes when I say that she is obsessed with doing me harm is the crazy one, for she has already done
a lot of harm to me through the years, and I have evidence to prove what I say (which is why I was denied a real trial).

Jan 6th Visit: Galileos Hair Looks Unkept, Uncombed, And Very Dry

This statement should not be misconstrued to insinuate that she feels some preference for Wencito.Despite being my husband's spitting image, he is not loved by her either, and indeed has been subjected to more conditioning than Galileo (due to the fact that he was older when stolen from us and knew way more). Wencito will not be treated well by her either,but Galileo may be treated even worst because he looks like me.When a person is solely governed by hate (no matter how carefully concealed) such associations (however meaningless to others) bears importance for the venting of sinister feelings.

Jan 6th Visit: Wencito Is Too Skinny

My eldest son, Wencito, is VERY skinny. By nature he has never been a chubby baby (as Galileo was) but the way that he looks now is just unacceptable. He's skeletal! Galileo too, is a little on the lean side (though slightly more plump than Wencito), considering how chubby he used to be.

Galileo had a strange looking shirt which Wencito had also worn on our November 11th 2010 visit with them (I keep a visit log, that's how I know the date). It has a little monster standing on the head of a big monster. The little monster says, " I don't bite but he does." referring to the big monster. I don't know what to make of it.
If I were dealing with a rational person I would not give it any thought. However,ever since Wencito came to a visit (when we used to visit them at the DCYF building) with a shirt saying "Feed Me", two weeks after we had complained that he was too skinny (a condition which sadly still persists), I find myself wondering when I see strange looking shirts on them. E-mails which Ana had sent to me while I was in Spain, shows that she is highly fond of cryptic mockery, and it also helps in the ignoble crusade to pass me off as "crazy and paranoid".

Wencito loved his art toys and immediately began to do drawings on a glow-up light drawing board.The visit supervisor brought three AA batteries so that he could use it. Galileo was greatly attached to his new stuffed bat, and I took advantage of this interest to sit him on my lap, and involve him in the reading of a bat storybook that had come with his plush toy.Poor child, in all likelihood he's never read to.

Jan 6th Visit: Galileo With His New Plush Bat

Jan 6th Visit: Wencito Operating Glow Light Feature In His New Toy

Wencito refused to play with Galileo's drum when my husband offered it to him. This reaction is so contrary to how he was before. He used to love music, playing with instruments and singing. I remember that when he was two years old he would like to play a double bongo drum which which he had while I sang.Those days to me now seem as distant as the moon is distant from our world.

Jan 6th Visit: Wencito Not Interested In Drum

Conditioning Wencito so that he will not want to learn music has to do with the fact that Wencito has considerable musical talent (I don't care who scoffs at this statement, its the plain truth). At two he could sing quite well to musical accompaniment, and at three he could play tunes on the piano. If Ana wants to pass off my son as low IQ/learning disabled she has to supress this area where he has shown to have precocious aptitude.

click here to see proof of Wencito's Musical Aptitude

Now,one of the videos seen in the link above is from the Jan 20th 2011 visit which I will be writing about, more in detail, in a separate entry. On this visit, Wencito (unlike the Jan 6th visit) hardly interacted with us.On that visit Wencito did not want to even try to play with the xylophone which he used to love so much to play at the age of three.
So, its not only a reluctance to play with a given musical toy (like the drum), he shuns ALL musical instruments, and all toys that have to do with letters and numbers(with the occasional exception of magnetic letters, numbers, and shapes, which he uses more for drawing than for learning). This is not how he was before.These personality changes are the result of nearly three years of conditioning.I am his mother. I know how he REALLY was before Ana started her behavior modification regime on him for his own detriment, and for her own vengeful purposes.

The visit supervisor extended the Jan 6th visit because it was Wencito's birthday. I accompanied Galileo to the potty to do pipi. While he was sitting down on the potty urinating, I noticed that the skin on his lower back was very dry, and there were two very tiny red round marks which looked almost like pimples. I have noticed for some time that Galileo has had dry looking skin, though I did not observe his skin carefully in the most recent visit (Jan 20th) to state if the condition persists. On the Jan 20th visit his hair was soft, combed, and normal looking (unlike the dry knotted hair of the Jan 6th visit) with the exception of a badly cut piece of hair which was sticking up like an antenna. I will continue to write more entries on future visits, though time limits, and failure to successfully upload and convert accompanying media will make it a doubly difficult task. These photos and videos of my boys are not solely for the purpose of enhancing this site (though they do help me better explain what is going on), I daily look at these recent photos and videos, because they are all that I have left of my stolen children, so they have an enormous sentimental value for me.

The Struggle To Unmask This Injustice:

I have placed the link to several videos which help to prove what I say. Every single video which I have uploaded for this entry, with the exception of two, have failed conversion (or so the site says).

There is an effort to impede me from showing what's really going on. Remember, that's why I was denied a real trial to begin with. I have had trouble with nearly every aspect of my computer, I have been sometimes blocked from entering my sites:

Cannot Get Into My CPA Protest Site Despite Numerous Attempts On Jan 25th 2011 At 10:15 AM

The videos which I have uploaded to Image shack to prove the hacking which is taking place on my computer, ALL have also failed conversion (or so the site says). I do not know if these videos might be visible from other people's computers. I only know that every computer that I've been on does not allow me to view them.

Error Occurred With Video Of Invisible Music Score Program Tab On January 13th At 7:51 PM

I am not making any of this up, as I have screenshots and videos galore to prove it.

The Visit Of March 3rd-The Nightmare Visit

March 3rd Visit-Galileos Hair Looks Horrible-And He Had A Shirt That Said "Spaced Out"!

March 17th, 2011

I am writing this entry before my visit today with my boys. I do not know how I will find them,
but if I do find them in a similar condition to that of two weeks ago, not only will I complain, but I will
have to take drastic action to prevent them from being subjected to any further degradation.

That said, I will continue to recount,what occurred on the March 3rd visit which I have dubbed
"The Nightmare Visit" because of the condition in which I found my poor boys.

In case you are wondering why I did not write this entry before, it is important to realize that I am the only one fighting against this injustice, and that this is really a one-woman crusade which
involves multi-task efforts. Take also into consideration the great personal suffering and stress which I experience on a daily basis, and one can fully appreciate the strength and determination, but above all the faith in G-D which is required to keep on going, even when circumstances can seem overwhelming.

Ana has influential agencies to cover up what she does, and who twist reality in order to shield her from accountability.
She has a whole army of people helping her in her ignoble endeavors, relatives of my husband, relatives of hers on her mother's side of the family (her mother was involved in the planning of this bizarre situation, and was in the apartment which used to be ours with Ana and her sister, doing only G-D knows what before they brought the FBI to the apartment).
Ana even tried calling people who were close to me, in order to try to enlist them in what she was doing with her good acting and lies, but that did not work out as she expected.
Ana knows certain influential people and has even had a close and friendly association for several years with a prominent Rhode Island politician who recently ran for Governor of this state by the name of Caprio. Whether she has exploited that relationship for her vindictive agenda I do not know. With her, and with what she has done so far, one should never underestimate what she is capable of.

Only a vast network of influence can maintain two children, taken from their parents without an investigation, separated from their parents for nearly three years (we are in the third year of this lunacy) without due process. Only behind-the-scenes
influence and power can achieve that. Many measures have been taken with our sons against our will and without our consent, and we
have been stripped of many of our vital parental rights, without us ever having had a chance to talk or present evidence in a court.
Only shady-dealings and corruption can achieve that. Yet their only defense is a dirty psychological ploy which they shamefully exploit,
they protect themselves by simply trying to label me as paranoid everytime I say the truth of what is going on. I have documentation to prove that MANY things have been done in secret from planning the removal of our children without an investigation,to their deportation to the U.S. from Spain, and there is sufficient evidence to tie Ana to these dealings. Ana has accused us of being in a cult, of abusing
and drugging up our children and making them do bizarre rituals, and many other such insanities. I have videos and photos galore to prove that my laptop is being hacked, yet in the face of all this evidence the only thing that can protect the perpetrators of this injustice is the mirage created by their influence as they villainously point their finger towards me and shield themselves by attacking my credibility with their magic phrase, "She's paranoid."

I am all alone, and I am fighting against the injustices committed by these powerful agencies who are manipulated by Ana, alone.
Everything that I do, I must do on my own, I have to think for myself, and motivate myself, and do things for myself no matter how worn out I might be. But then again, I know that G-D is with me, and I rather have G-D on my side than a million people to
do things for me. Nevertheless managing all these tasks such as the upkeep of this site, my other site at Buzznet, other sites which I have made to combat this injustice,keeping a visit diary, working on reports and refutations, documenting evidence is all so time-consuming for one lonely stressed-out individual.
I had to get data and media ready for this entry prior to writing it. That in itself can also be a challenge since my computer is hacked by those associated with the very person who falsely accused me, and who is conditioning and mistreating my children while slandering them with false labels.

I had to struggle for a few days just to be able to save the video which I made exposing the neglect to which my children evidently had been subjected to, as in the beginning the video would not save in Windows Movie Maker, and the computer would go haywire,

The Program Will Not Allow Me To Save Video On March 6th At 4:44 AM

When I went on the bus to the library I also encountered difficulties using the program on their computers.

Windows Movie Maker Program Is Not Accessible From Cranston Central Library On March 7th At 9:15 AM

I ask that the link under the photos which are displayed in this entry be clicked on, so that further information can be read in the provided image description. In this way my task of documenting visit occurrences in these entries will be easier by the availability of this supplementary information provided under the photos when one clicks on the photo links.

The below video shows when I was finally able to save the video which you will have an opportunity to view in this entry.

On March 3rd (shortly before the visit) we received a phone call from the visit supervisor, who notified us that Wencito was sick and had a fever. He was trying to give us the option of canceling the visit and re-scheduling, which I was even more reluctant to do at hearing of Wencito's state.

I started writing in my visit diary immediately after I had finished speaking with him on the phone, and will place that excerpt below:

Written On March 3rd Before The Visit

"We received a call from the visit supervisor, but did not immediately pick up as I was getting ready for our visit with the boys. When we called back a few minutes later (we did not recognize the cell phone number), my husband heard the voice of the visit supervisor in the voice mail. He left the visit supervisor a message, but we nevertheless called the CASEY Center, and were able to talk with the visit supervisor.
We were told by him that Wencito was running a fever (that his temperature was slighly elevated).
The visit supervisor was about to pick him up at daycare. Galileo was with him and spoke to me on the phone, and told me that he loved me, precious little angel that he is.
I asked the visit supervisor how this had all occurred and he told me that this morning Wencito was fine, and that he also was fine in school,
but that afterwards while in daycare he was looking a bit sluggish after naptime. When his temperature was taken, it was found to be elevated.We were given the option of rescheduling, but I decided to go as I would have no peace worrying about him if I do not see him. I consider this willful neglect on Ana's part."

( The above excerpt was written on March 3rd at 3:24 PM)

We arrived at the CASEY Center, and sat down to wait.

March 3rd Visit-My Husband While We Were Waiting For Wencito In CASEY

We had brought no toys or activities because we had left in a hurry,and because I was very worried about Wencito's proclaimed state. Also the two hours which I would sleep within a 48 hour period were slept on that day before my husband came from work and we started to prepare for the visit. Little did I realize at the time in what poor state I would find BOTH of my sons.

We did bring to the visit the following things: 1) Two shirt and pant suits (one for Galileo and another for Wencito)

Things For March 3rd Visit- Shirt And Pant Sets For Wencito And Galileo Pic1

Things For March 3rd Visit- Shirt And Pant Sets For Wencito And Galileo Pic 2

2) Nine all-natural vitamin fortified juice cans

Things For March 3rd Visit- All Natural Vitamin Fortified Fruits Juices Pic1

3) Four Boxes Of Organic (or partly-Organic) vitamin fortified cereal bars containing eight bars in each box

Things For March 3rd Visit - Four Boxes Of Organic Vitamin Fortified Cereal Bars

4) A container of children's plant based multi-vitamins (with probiotics) enough to last the boys for two weeks

Things Purchased For March 3rd Visit: Kids Multivitamin With Probiotics Pic 1

5) A bottle of organic herbal soap for bathing

Things Purchased For March 3rd Visit:Organic Herbal Kids Bathing Soap Pic 1

6) Organic Probiotic smoothies

March 3rd Visit- Galileo Taking An Organic Probiotic Smoothie

7) Chocolate Gost's Milk (which Wencito can be seen drinking in the photo below)

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Drinking Chocolate Goats Milk-Vitamins Brought For The Boys Seen On Table

and 8) a box of organic vitamin fortified cookies.

Items 6-8 were mostly consumed during the visit (though the boys took the leftover cookies with them).

When the visit supervisor had called, before us going to CASEY, Galileo was with him, but Wencito was not. He had said that he was going to pick up Wencito who was not feeling well. Later on, as I pondered on it, it seemed strange that Wencito was not already with him at the time of the phone call,
for though Galileo and Wencito are apart in their current daycare (thanks to Ana's sinister interference-look below)

Ana Does Not Want Galileo To Be With Wencito And Requested Disabled Daycare

they still go to the same daycare building, so if the visit supervisor had already picked up Galileo, why did he not pick up Wencito at the same time? Why go all the way back from Providence to Post Road in Warwick when he had already been there to pick up Galileo? Such a move would pose a hugely unnecessary inconvenience, not to mention a waste of time and gasoline.

When we arrived at CASEY we were not aware that Galileo was already there, and the staff (who must have been aware of it) did not bother to inform us as they saw us waiting.
We naturally at the time assumed that the visit supervisor had taken Galileo with him to pick up Wencito. When the visit supervisor arrived with Wencito, I was writing in my visit diary, but only
was able to write a sentence, as they suddenly came at that moment.

March 3rd Visit-I working On Visit Diary Describing Events Related To That Day

The sentence which I wrote was the following: "I am writing to lessen a bit the overwhelming stress."

The Video which mentions "The Nightmare Visit" of March 3rd (I had to work REALLY hard to save this video)

I approached Wencito to hug him only to witness him push away from me and say "I don't want a shock!"
Naturally I was greatly perplexed by this behavior, though I knew its likely origin. Nevertheless, there was something this time that was different about his behavior, and I sensed it from the beginning of the visit. In great distress I saw how from the time before we even entered the visiting room Wencito was acting strangely, and running all over the place, as if he had ants in his pants. I knew that Ana had done once again her dirty work in conditioning him, and in doing G-D knows what else to my son, in retaliation for the very truthful exposé which I had made in the March 2nd entry on this site against CPS Abuse.

Ana monitors all my sites and is behind the hacking of my laptop. I encountered great difficulties posting the March 2nd and 3rd entries on this site, as the browser would keep crashing on me ( as the two videos below show):

March 2nd Video (the browser crashes at the end of the video)

March 3rd Video

In my March 2nd entry I had explained how Ana is trying to pass off both of my sons (but especially the eldest) as "learning disabled" and "problematic", and how she not only manipulates money-hungry agencies, but conditions and does other things to my sons, in order to modify their behavior in a way that is convenient for her
vindictive agenda. This is done by creating an artificial compatibility between the behavior traits, and reactions, that she carefully engineers in my small sons, and the symptoms of the conditions which she so fervently aspires to label my poor boys with.
So I immediately understood the motives and implications of Wencito's behavior on March 3rd. Ana was sending me a taunting message through Wencito's very behavior, and that message was,

"You say that Wencito is not learning disabled and problematic. Well, look at how I've made him behave. Let's see if others will believe you now. Ha,ha,ha!"

At seeing my son in such a sorry state, which is so alien to how his true self is, and realizing how my son is being victimized by hypocrites who benefit from his gradual deterioration, either monetarily
( as in these agencies),or through the sick satisfaction of vindictive caprices (such as in Ana and her sister), righteous anger swelled up within me, and the indignation brought about by a developed moral conscience, and further augmented by maternal love, made my indignation before such an outrage hard to bear.

I tried to post the section above of the March 17th entry before going to the the visit with my boys. It normally would have taken me only minutes, but I was blocked from entering my CPS site. The portion that will be seen after this commentary will be written after the my visit with the boys.

This is being written after my March 17th visit with the boys

I encountered minor difficulties when trying to log into this site, as the computer became somewhat uncooperative all of a sudden, and this weird fake message came out while I was trying to log in.However, I was able to log in successfully.

Weird Fake Message Comes Out When I Was Trying To Log Into My CPS Site On March 17th At 7:06 PM

I will write about today's March 17th visit in a separate entry, but will limit myself to say the following: On this visit (today), they were in much better condition physically, and Galileo had on one
of the shirts that we had bought him.They however continue to show signs of neglect in many other aspects. Wencito was still withdrawn (more so than on previous visits-with the exception of the March 3rd visit) and though he was not behaving as strangely as on the March 3rd visit, he still was acting in a way that was somehow different from that of previous visits. He spoke with us less, and was not so cooperative with regard to doing an art activity which I had planned for both of them. But then again Galileo was also not very cooperative in completing the activity, but at least made more effort than Wencito whose conditioning is more severe. As a result of Ana's pre-visit conditioning I was not able to obtain audio files from the March 3rd visit of
Wencito speaking with me because he was not behaving as he usually does (though on other visits conditioning has always been present in varying degrees), and the files from this visit (March 17th) will be very slim, as he spoke little with me due to Ana's behavior modification regime (smile Ana I know you read my sites!).
Ana,who monitors all my sites, no doubt has seen the audio site which I have made for Wencito's recordings (and whose link was provided in this site), and realizing how it might prove detrimental to the image that she so desperately wants to propagate of Wencito, has obviously conditioned him to speak even less than he usually does.
I did not film as much from the March 17th visit, in part because of Wencito's increasingly Ana-induced withdrawn behavior (he was not like that before he was taken),and because I spent a good chunk of the visit debating issues with the visit supervisor while interacting with Galileo.What sparked these debates was his comment that my eldest son might be left back an extra year due to his environmentally induced and artificially created delays, when we had requested study sessions with the boys last year in May 2010. All this however will be explained more in detail in the March 17th visit entry.

(continuation of March 3rd Visit)

I angrily approached the visit supervisor (this was before we entered the visiting room) and in an angry tone told him,

"Why is Wencito behaving like that! Why is he behaving like this!"

For a split second he also responded in an angry tone of voice which just as quickly mellowed down, saying,

"Wait a minute will you, I don't know."

Something which I found hard to believe. Furthermore my son was acting as if some substance had been given to him ( or something must have been done to him). His behavior was similar to that of someone who is high on something. On this visit he did not really converse with me as on other visits, and said several nonsensical things, so Ana did her behavior modification work well.
I felt that even my angry tone towards this man was more than civil, considering how these meddlesome agencies have only served as agents of destruction to further facilitate Ana's obsession of permanently destroying my family's unity.
Another person (most likely they themselves being in my shoes) would have screamed at or cursed these people, or worse. I have noticed how the DCYF social worker has shown anger in the past when I have protested her abuses, or demanded that our rights be upheld.
I have also ocassionally noticed anger (but of a more concealed sort) among CASEY personnel for stating the truth of what is occurring.
So if these people can show anger when their victims assert their rights, I greatly doubt that they would maintain the civility and composure which I have exhibited while in this oppressive state.
One thing is to unjustly judge from the arrogant throne of a self-proclaimed demi-god, and quite another is to be in the shoes of one's victim and grudgingly accept the dignity and courage that allows the oppressed to survive oppression.

As we were walking towards the visiting room, I saw a lady who works there smile (or perhaps one should say mildly laugh) while looking at me
in a way which did not seem at all to emanate amiability or good will. Others may criticize what I am saying, and Ana and her friends might jump desperately at these words to try to pass me off as paranoid, but I am only accurately describing what I really noticed, and regardless of the reason for
this lady's reaction, paranoia signifies irrational fear, and I am not afraid of any these people, and it is not irrational to think it probable that those who violate your rights are capable of mocking your suffering. The fact is that my sons on the March 3rd visit looked horrible,and whoever seeing such a sad state smiles, obviously does not do so with good intentions.

As we entered the visiting room I was shocked to see Galileo's poor state and the hideous hair cut which he had. Galileo's hair looked as nightmarish
as the situation in which he and his brother are in. Indeed the whole visit was nightmarish (look at the video provided above) which is why as I have already
mentioned that I dubbed it "The Nightmare Visit".

March 3rd Visit-Galileos Badly Cut Hair Pic 2 (Ana Has A Strange Obsession With Galileo's Hair)

When I commented wryly (yet inquiringly) to the visit supervisor if a child had cut Galileo's hair, he replied that he thought it had been a barber.
The determination of these agencies to deceive, downplay, and outright deny never ceases to amaze nor indignate me. As I looked at my poor 3 1/2 year old son, with this obviously abnormal haircut and his shirt saying "Spaced Out", which was undoubtedly paying a pantomimic tribute to the preferences for cryptic mockery so favored by his cowardly abuser (Ana), I really wondered if this surreal situation could get any worse.What new bizarre atrocities can still emerge from the dark crevices of Ana's twisted immature mind, whose only muse is irrational hatred nurtured by an uncanny ability to conceal that very hatred?
For an agency to claim that a barber would cut hair like that is to insult one's intelligence in an unadmirable attempt to cover the sky with one hand. No barber who cuts like that would last in business for long. My sons were in an appalling state, and I knew that the indifference towards that state which is so consistently displayed by others, is merely
an anxious spectator, seeing how far I can be provoked by the absolutely intolerable without breaking down.
The nervous breakdown that others wish me to have, probably seems to be the surest way of covering up their illegal activities, and so be able to justify what they fear will be exposed.
When in the visiting room, the visit supervisor came towards me and said that he knows that I am upset and worried about the boys not being with me, to which I did not respond, for if these agencies really valued my dignity, and the dignity of my children, firstly, they would not be a party to this injustice, and secondly my boys would not come to the visits in such poor shape.

My eldest son Wencito did no activity on this visit apart from building a tower and briefly playing hopscotch on some foam number tiles.

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Not Reacting To Affection-He Was Not Like This-This Is A Conditioned Behavior

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Playing With A Tower He Made

March 3rd Visit-Ana Most Likely Puts Very Long Pants On Wencito (Highlighted In Red) So That His Normal Walking Will Be Less Noticeable

Wencito did not even show interest in drawing or any other art-related activity, something extremely out of the ordinary, because even on visits (when due to Ana's conditioning) he has not interacted much with us, he has always done some art-related activity of his own initiative. Also on other visits he has not exhibited the behavior which was manifest on this visit. The only positive thing that came out from his excessive running and jumping was that I was able to obtain irrefutable proof that Wencito has no problems walking,and does not need physical therapy. This of course I have always known, and I have proof from earlier. I even made a video which can be seen below:

He ran a lot within the room, something which he does not do on other visits,

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Running All Over The Room As If He Were High On Something

March 3rd Visit- Wencito Running In The Room Again

and started at one point screaming while putting for a brief while his body slighly rigid and saying to us, "No shock for you!" All the while he was acting strange.

March 3rd Visit- Wencito Running And Acting Strangely-This Is NOT His Normal Behavior-Ana Did Something To Him For This Visit

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Screaming Strangely-He Has Not Done This On Previous Visits-Ana Did Something To Him To Alter His Behavior For This Visit

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Also Has Ugly Haircut And Was Behaving Strangely As If High On Something

March 3rd Visit-Wencito Also Has Ugly Haircut And Was Behaving Strangely As If High On Something Pic 2

Later on, I did notice some strange scratch/injury on his back. It's hard to describe verbally or in written form, but nevertheless I will make an attempt. It was not a nail scratch, nor the even scratch of a sharp fine object. The area of the skin located on his lower back had tiny red dots which looked as they had bled at one point, and the skin all around this area was extremely dry and lumpy.

March 3rd Visit- The Area Around Where The Strange Scratch Was Located (Area Highlighted In Red)-I Tried The Best That I Could But The Lighting Was Poor

Wencito said that it hurt (look at the video above in this entry titled "Visits of 2011 & The Signs Of Conditioning") and started screaming when I lifted his shirt to look at it, and tried to film it (the poor lighting in the room also did not help). Despite two attempts at filming it, I was not able to clearly capture what both I and my husband saw, because of Wencito's reluctance to let us look at it for a longer period of time in order to film it clearly, and the poor lighting in the room.
This however occurred toward the end of the visit, so when I noticed what he had on his back, and showed it to my husband (who is also a witness), I had extremely limited time and was not able to make more attempts at filming it.

Earlier during the visit I had told the visit supervisor that I knew that G-D was going to do justice for what had been done to my family, and that his agency's attempts to pass me off as crazy and paranoid will not be successful. He asked to leave the room saying "Excuse me for a moment."
He always leaves the room for periods of time and then comes back, so this is not unusual in itself.
On another occasion during the visit I saw him looking down at Wencito and smiling while Wencito was laying upon the foam number tiles which he had used to play hopscotch earlier, and was acting a bit strange. At observing the visit supervisor's facial expressions in relation to Wencito's behavior I told him, "Its not humorous.", referring to Wencito's out of the norm behavior.
He responded "Well , you know. Kids will play..."
I told him that this was not Wencito's usual behavior ( something which can be confirmed in other videos).

During this visit I did take advantage to teach Galileo to count. He had forgotten what I had taught him on a previous visit due to lack of practice and stimulation in his intellectually dead foster home environment. However, I managed to re-teach him how to count up to six using dice and boardgame pieces, and he learned quickly.

March 3rd Visit- Galileo Counting The Five Dots On Dice-He Counted Them Correctly

While I was teaching Galileo his numbers Wencito came near us and started counting. This was really the only time in the whole visit that he really interacted with us. I noticed that Wencito can no longer count in French and Spanish as he had been able to do when he was three, and that he seemed not to be able to count past twenty.
This only serves to confirm what I have stated before, that what Wencito still knows is but a surviving vestige of what we had taught him, and what he knew at the age of three prior to his abduction, and that save for potty training, he has learned absolutely nothing while in Ana's perilous "care", but has actually suffered an environmentally-induced regression which continues to be carefully maintained through intentional neglect, lack of stimulation, and intense conditioning.
At 3 1/2 years of age he could count up to twenty in English, Spanish, and French. Now at the age of six he can only count up to twenty in English. If that is progress, then the world is flat, just as Dark Age ignoramuses thought.
During this visit, Wencito did not respond to affection, even when his father hugged him. He did reluctantly allow me to kiss him once, but on other occasions refused my demonstrations of affection. This of course is a behavior that has been purposefully conditioned in him by Ana.

Wencito had a shirt with the number 7 on it. Please click on the link of the image below to read what I think of this. Also click on the links under the other photos in this entry for additional info.

March 3rd Visit-Wencito's Shirt With Number 7

During this visit the boys left chocolate goat's milk, and some of the cookies. The leftover cookies they took with them. It seems that they were probably fed something before the visit despite the fact that it is common knowledge already that we come to every visit with high quality nutritious food. Towards the end of the visit I handed over the multi-vitamins, clothing, and organic food that had been
brought for the boys. My husband had taken Galileo to the potty. The visit supervisor said that he would convey my wishes while implying that he does not know if they will be given. I explained to him that if after we spent our money on these things they are not given, Ana will only be exposing her real intentions by not giving them to the boys. My husband returned and while the visit supervisor took the things and left I started to examine Galileo and found no strange marks. However, as I examined Wencito I noticed the strange scratch/ dry lumpy skin on his back. At first I told my husband to please hold him so that I could look at it, but when Wencito did not want to be held, I pleaded with Wencito to please let me look at his back. He complied, albeit briefly, and I had to try a second time to film what I and my husband had seen. The rest of what occurred is described earlier in this entry. We told the visit supervisor (who had returned) about it, but he did not really comment on it, though he did tell Wencito to let me look at his back ( I was not filming when this).

The boys did not have the black winter hats that had been purchased for them, and which were given to them on the prior visit of February 17th.
As the boys were leaving my husband suggested that I leave my purse where I carry all my things in the visiting room, in order to accompany the boys to the visit supervisor's car. I complied with my husband's request though I found it irrational, because it made no sense to leave the purse, when it was all that we had to take with us, apart from an empty bag. To me it was just an unnecessary extra effort and time wasted, to have to come back to the visiting room to get a purse that one could take with one to the visit supervisor's car, and afterwards continue on our way. Though I acquiesced to please my husband I will do no such folly again. We went to the visit supervisor's car to see the boys off, and the visit supervisor asked me if I wanted to put Galileo in his car seat.
I did notice that Galileo at least had a blanket to put over his carseat.I also used to carry blankets in winter when the boys went out. I buckled Galileo into his carseat, blessed both boys and sadly took my leave of them.

We re-entered the building and we went to the visiting room to get my purse and an empty 365 Whole Foods bag with some still useful napkins inside. As I sat down with my purse on the seat near the aquarium (where my husband had been seated earlier before the visit), taking my winter hat out to put on, the director of CASEY passed by and said to me with a sly smile, "Is this your pen?" while showing me a pen which did belong to me.
I said, "Yes." and he said that he had found it on the floor. I did not respond to this.He then asked us about how we had found the boys, while I was thinking all the while that surely he must have been aware of their poor state. He must have seen Galileo's hideous haircut, and he knew Wencito was sick and with a fever. I told him that Wencito was sick with a fever and that he had been withdrawn from us and had said that he "did not want a shock". The director then made the laughable suggestion that perhaps Wencito was referring to static electricity, and then attempted to explain to me what static electricity was, as if I were some illiterate ignoramus.
I could have asked him how static electricity had contributed to the etymology of the word "electricity", but I thought to myself "Why bother yourself?", and merely was satisfied to reply " I know what static electricity is."
Wencito was very uncomfortable with me looking at his back, and got very anxious when I did, and I doubt that static electricity could be the cause of what both I and my husband saw on his back.

I Am Banned From Purchasing Things For My Own Sons For Them To Take With Them

Thursday March 31st 2011

I am at the downtown Providence library and experienced difficulties getting into my Buzznet account:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

When I tried getting into this site against CPS Abuse I was not successful at first.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

However, finally I was able to get in.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

I am accustomed to these types of difficulties every time I try to fight against the grave injustice done to I and my poor sons. The below videos will illustrate what occurred when I posted the entry describing the March 3rd visit, which was begun on March 17th, and finally completed and posted on March 18th.

As if that were not bad enough, when I tried to save the video shown below on Windows Movie Maker, my laptop went haywire and the Movie Maker program froze and became inoperable. It took me NINE hours of struggling to save a video which under normal circumstances only takes around 20 minutes to save! I am not making this up.

The below video will show what occurred when I tried to save the visit video visible above:

So I am used to encountering an onslaught of difficulties everytime I seek to use the computer in my fight against the crimes committed against I and my sons. I have been denied a real trial and have not been able to present any evidence in any court three years after my children were stolen from me without an investigation, due the false accusations of someone who has falsely accused me in the past, and whose real motives are common knowledge (despite the convincing show that she puts on for others). I was never meant to have authentic due process, nor can one rationally expect DCYF and affiliated agencies to want me to have a real and fair trial based on Constitutional law, which would uphold the very law which they are so intensely determined to persistently violate. A real trial would be against DCYF interests and agenda, because they know that they have violated the laws and a REAL court would uphold the laws which they are so determined to keep violating. Since I was never meant to have due process, as is the sad lot of those victimized by tyrants, that also extends to free speech and the ability to exercise that vital Constitutional right in my own defense, and in the defense of my sons. So it is no surprise to me that my computer is being so viciously hacked, and that even when I have used other computers I have encountered difficulties logging into my accounts, or other bizarre things have happened to me while working within those sites.

I had originally intended my next entry to be about the March 17th visit, however the urgency of this situation, which deserves immediate update coverage, compels me to write about the extremely unpleasant occurrences which took place in today's visit. The children were in better condition, though Wencito appeared to be mildly sick, something which
is incomprehensible due to the vitamins and certain organic products that we have been purchasing for them since the March 3rd visit (we have been purchasing clothes for them since the February 17th visit).Wencito did interact with me today way more than on the last two visits

However, I will not delve into other areas of today's visit for now, except to state that the regular visit supervisor did not supervise the visit, but a DCYF social worker substituting for the regular DCYF worker Heather Fogg, who is on vacation. It seems that her vacation will be quite a lengthy one, as the substitute worker gave me his card in case I wanted to call him.

The immediate reason for writing this entry is to document something which I knew could happen, but was hoping to be mistaken in. We started to purchase things for our sons because I had noticed (and I have proof of this in videos, photos, and in my visit diary entries) the poor condition in which my sons have been in when they have come to many of the visits.
I have been demanding that DCYF give organic kosher food to my sons (as I used to do) since 2009, but all my requests are pompously brushed to the side. Because I have seen my sons sick so often and in general poor shape on so many visits, we were purchasing these things so beneficial for their well being which can be seen in the gallery at the link below:

Things Bought For The Boys That Were Left For Them To Take With Them To Ana's House:A Photo Gallery (click)

Before having my camera we would purchase things for the boys that we would always bring back with us, as I knew the high likelihood of Ana throwing them out, or intentionally allowing them to be lost or broken. However, once I had my digital video camcorder/camera I knew that I could somehow help my sons' ever deteriorating state by purchasing nice things for them and documenting what I purchased so that Ana would not be able to throw them away, or do something else to the items purchased.

It had given me some measure of satisfaction to know that I could somehow help my sons' plight by providing them with things which I knew they would otherwise not have, as DCYF (and of course Ana Dickenson) has refused to provide them with nutritious organic food and safe organic hygiene products,vitamins, and nice looking clothes. On the March 17th visit I had noticed that the visit supervisor looked angry (but in a concealed way, which was nevertheless detectable) when we had shown him the clothes, and told us, "You know they have a lot of clothes." To which I candidly responded "It does not seem that way in the visits."
However, his comment did make it apparent that DCYF and CASEY do not like the fact that we buy clothes and other things for our sons, and one can be sure that Ana revels it even less.

So should it come as a surprise that today as I handed the things over to the visit supervisor (who had not supervised the visit but was nevertheless within the building) he told me that that was the last time that he was going to be taking things that we purchased for the boys to Ana's house? His bogus excuse was that it was a CASEY "policy" which he had not been aware of. I explained to him that for there to be a policy there have to be many cases of a similar nature that would serve as a motive for formulating such a policy. In other words, a lot of parents whose children have been taken away from them would have to bring clothes, vitamins, and food to CASEY
in order to establish a precendent that would serve as a basis for creating such a policy, something which I seriously doubt. When I asked him who had told him that he could no longer take the things that we purchase for our sons, he told me that it had been the Director of CASEY. Though I did not say anything insulting and spoke to him in a civil fashion (too civil for what these agencies have done to me) I did have an irritated tone of voice, I did assert my rights,
I was not hypocritical, but honest and said that I knew that Ana was behind this ( she monitors my sites, has seen the photos which I have placed documenting what we purchase, and does not want my sons to have good things).
I also sensed by observing his facial expressions that the visit supervisor seemed to relish my irritation. Indeed these people do their best to purposefully create vexful situations that few people would tolerate (including themselves if they were in my shoes) in order to get me to react in a certain way, which can then be misconstrued to create a negative yet false image of me. They are trying to pass me off as crazy and paranoid, and I have received e-mails from Ana while in Spain in which she cryptically taunts me and says those very things about me. Ana exerts ENORMOUS behind the scenes control and influence over these agencies, something which I have proven on this site with documentation and links.

Nevertheless, let me further elaborate the profundity of these agencies' hypocrisy. The below image was taken today March 31st. It is a poster which is on the front desk of the receptionist when one enters the CASEY building.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

I must frankly confess that I find this hypocrisy so sickening, notice the closeup shot of the same poster below:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

So according to these hypocrites, a person "does not need to be rich, married, or a homeowner" to be a foster parent. They "only have to care"! (If this were not so outrageous I'd be laughing).

( The section of the entry below was edited or written on April 1st 2011)

Yet we are penalized for CARING about our OWN children to the point where we are even banned from purchasing things for them that can only be beneficial for them and promote their well being. Already before this refusal we have been denied the right to have a REAL, fair trial, the right to educate our own children, the right to see them more frequently, and now we cannot even use our limited income (thanks to Ana) to ensure that they have some things which will at least to some extent counteract the bad food which they are consuming 24/7, the lack of nourishment, and the ugly clothing which they have on most of the visits. If I have noticed for many visits that Galileo has had very dry skin (and I have), we cannot purchase organic herbal soaps for kids that will be way more gentler and healthier for their tender and delicate skin, because of a made-up "policy" which looks more like an improvised opposition move influenced by Ana. If such a policy would have existed, the director of CASEY, who has seen us in the past with things for our boys to take with them, would have stated so from the beginning.

As stated before in this entry, I knew that this was a possibility, because of course Ana, who on purpose neglects and mistreats them behind closed doors, and has allowed them to be sick so often through her shabby "care" of them, would not want my sons to have access to high-quality vitamins which would keep them healthy, to nice clothes, or to good nutritious food. The plant-based natural vitamins with probiotics could also aid in improving cognitive skills (nutrition DOES make a difference) which is a big NO-NO for Ana who is inducing artificially-created delays in my children in order
to pass them off as learning disabled,and as having behavioral and/or social problems.

So despite what the poster which can be seen above says, about only having to care to be a foster parent, let us examine what these people who have aided Ana's vendetta have done. They have participated in keeping two children separated from parents who CARE about them, and took good care of them (that's why there was no investigation),
and gave them to a person who does NOT CARE about them at all. They think that Ana is more "competent" simply because she has more income than us (thanks to my husband who helped her frequently in the monetary sense,and also with his time, when she was dirt poor seven years ago), and because she is living now in better conditions than us, while ignoring the fact that she needed an agency to be hired so that my youngest son could be potty trained and learn how to wash his hands, and that my sons are most of the day being "cared" for by others rather than by her, and even with all this help which she has, the boys have come to most visits in shabby condition.

When I told the visit supervisor that I would continue to purchase things for my sons, he said, "Fine, you can purchase them, but someone else will have to take them." Of course,he knows that we have no one else to take them, and that we have been banned from going to the daycare center (though we did make an attempt to go when we had no car, something which will be explained in another entry).If he has to go to Ana's house anyhow on a frequent basis to bring back the boys, there is no rational reason why he cannot once every two weeks take a bag or two of things at the same time that he returns the boys and hand the bags to her, if it will promote the well being of the boys (which of course is the least that these agencies care about).

The visit supervisor looked quite joyous (that sparkle in his eye and his subtle smile were quite noticeable) at my indignation when confronted by such irrational reluctance which can only serve to further enhance my sons' detrimental state. The DCYF worker who had substituted for Heather Fogg told me that it was not good to talk about that issue in front of the children, but missed the point that I was safeguarding the children's well being by insisting that I be allowed to purchase healthy things for my own sons. Furthermore I was not insulting the visit supervisor,only asserting my rights and stating that I would continue to purchase things. So the only thing that Wencito could have realized from that dialogue was that he has a mommy who cares for him, and who wants him to have his vitamins, good food, and nice clothing.Its a positive thing for a child to see their parents actively safeguarding their well being, for it allows the child to see that they are valued, but as usual in my case, everything is misconstrued to make the good seem bad and the bad seem good. Its sad that no one seems to care about all the things that Ana must be doing in front of my sons,and what she in all likelihood is telling them about me. In the past, her daughters have innocently mentioned to me things which she has said to them about me which were of a negative nature.
Is it rational then to assume that she would not try to do likewise with my sons, when her motive for wanting them to be under her roof is solely vindictive? I think not.

The organic food that we buy for them, is for them to eat at their daycare for the period of two weeks, when we come again to the next visit with more things. We have called the daycare in the past (as mentioned in the March 2nd 2011 entry on this site), and they told us that we could not go there to take food products. At the time we wanted to also take a fiber supplement for Wencito's then serious constipation problem (we don't know if he still might have this problem, its quite possible, though with the probiotic-laden multi-vitamins which we have been purchasing the problem should now somewhat subside).The severe constipation that Wencito had at that time adequately highlights the reality of the nutritional deficiencies which he has had the misfortune to experience while in Ana's perilous "care".

I left the things in the room towards the end of the visit, because the visit supervisor had taken Galileo without I being able to say farewell to him, so I had to go towards the entrance of the building to say farewell to him. It was snowing and raining where I live, so the day was as somber as my lamentable situation. When we were leaving, after having picked up the toys that we were going to take back with us, as well as what was leftover of Galileo's birthday cake,the director of CASEY came out and greeted us, I went towards the director and complained about what had occurred with the visit supervisor, and how the visit supervisor had said that he had ordered that no more things purchased by us go to Ana's house.
The director seemed to doubt what I had said about the visit supervisor having told me that he (the director) had said that no further items could be taken to Ana's house, and evaded my questions giving me ambiguous answers. He could not tell me if there was such a policy and said that he would look it up. I told him that he had seen us before with things for our sons to take with them and that there had been no mention of any such policy, furthermore I explained to him that many people would have to have done what we are now doing to set a precedent for such a policy. To me this sounds like the CASEY equivalent of "Ex Post Facto" (to declare a previously acceptable action, a crime or offense after it has been done, in order to intentionally jeopardize the person who committed the action before it was declared to be offensive).

The director of CASEY also seemed to relish my obvious irritation, as had the visit supervisor.One would have to be either brain-dead (and thus unconscious), or extremely masochistic in order not to be irritated at such abusive maneuvers implemented by these agencies, and by the undignified games being played with our lives and our children's well being. These agencies don't like me, because though I have been as civil to them as possible under these trying circumstances, I have asserted my rights and have not willingly allowed myself to be victimized, and these arrogant individuals do not like that. I told the director that I know that his agency and DCYF are trying to pass me off as crazy, and that Ana has expressed this desire before she involved them. I also told him that deep down inside he must know that I am being truthful when I say that we have been the victim of horrendous civil rights violations.Towards the end of our dialogue I asked him to give me one rational non-biased reason as to why the boys should not be able to take things with them which unquestionably promote their well being. What harm could come from taking vitamins, organic food, and clothing to Ana's house? He did not answer, but said that he would check the policy to see if we could or could not buy things for our sons to take with them! How much more tyrannical can these agencies become?

I later realized more in detail why the visit supervisor and director appeared to be so subtly gleeful at my apparent irritation when denied the right to buy things for my own sons for them to take with them, while I was perusing papers which the substitute DCYF worker had given me. Those papers (which show Ana's heavy influence) have about as much credibility as a Cinderella story, and make
my sons seem as if they are problematic children who know nothing and have no intelligence, and paint me as a dangerous violent person who needs parenting classes, and might need medication (I guess that DCYF appointed mercenary psychiatrists are still not content with the money that they have made from my family's oppression, and wish to turn my body into a source of extra revenue)! They claim that I
need "anger management counseling". Actually this has been said of my sons as well, that they need to "learn to deal with frustration/disappointment" (look at the images of the March 2nd entry), and these papers given to me yesterday keeps saying the same of Wencito (before it was said of both my sons-look at March 2nd entry on this site).The only one who is not labeled with these slanders is my husband, and that's because his relatives (some of them) are behind this , and this has nothing to do with truth but with VENGEANCE.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

If I were a dangerous violent person, with all the harm that others have done to I and my kids I would have already done some real damage, and when Ana showed up in Whole Foods last year with my kids to provoke me with her camouflaged taunts, I would have done something to her (look at the February 26th 2010 entry on this site). All normal people get angry when abused.I have never insulted these agency people.
There have been times when I have spoken in an irritated tone of voice (and who wouldn't in my situation?), and I have spoken at times with authority asserting my rights, and demanding that they be respected. However, I am being painted by Ana's smear campaign allies as someone who is dangerous, stupid,immature,and incompetent. Ironically, everything that Ana is.
I have known for some time that that is one of the likely explanations as to why DCYF and CASEY turn a willing blind eye while Ana chronically neglects my children (look at some of the photos provided in other previous entries on this site). They like for me to see my kids in poor shape because they wish to provoke me to anger, and they use my love as a mother as a tool to engineer reactions ( which are normal under those circumstances), which are then twisted and misconstrued as an aid in their character assassination of me. They create artificial situations to provoke me, they make my life hell on purpose, for they wish to provoke certain reactions in me, or better yet, drive me over the edge with so much abuse so that I will have a nervous breakdown, and they can then come in for the kill with their labels.
I have said several times to my husband that Ana and her sister being in my shoes would not survive even two weeks without a nervous breakdown, or worse.
The fact that I have survived this situation for three years is a supreme testament to my stability, fortitude, and self-control. Unstable people cannot take a lot of stress. An unstable person in my shoes would not have survived, they would have instantly had a nervous breakdown, or would have commited suicide. They would not have been able to focus under such great and constant stress, and do all that I have done to fight this injustice.
As I write these words I realize the dire nature of my situation,and I am stressed out and tired in my lonely fight against those who wield great influence, and yet I am calmly writing these words (even when I know that there will be efforts to misconstrue these very words that I am writing now to aid in the creation of Machiavellian- style lies), for I am sustained by my faith in G-D, my inner strength, my stability, and my sense of purpose and convictions. This does not mean that I am never prone to anger, all normal people get angry when they are victimized (unless they like being abused), but even anger should have a constructive purpose such as motivating one to fight against injustice. Nevertheless, the person who does not get angry when encountering abuse and oppression is the one who is truly abnormal. For what dictates the normalcy of a behavior is the circumstances under which it manifests itself.
There is no worse management of anger, than that of anger which is not manifested (albeit morally) during times when normality requires anger. If being outraged at oppression indicates a need for anger managment counseling, then I guess that the patriots who fought the American Revolution, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and others who have fought to defend their rights are part of the crowd
which supposedly needs this exceedingly dubious "help".
There is nothing more insane than for a tyrannical person or entity to oppress and consistently seek to provoke innocent individuals, and then cynically state that their victims need "anger management counseling" for being upset at what was done to them. This is a dirty psychological ploy that is meant to not only further oppress, but to viciously slander and misconstrue the normal reactions of those who value their dignity, in an attempt to intimidate the victim into not protesting abuses. Those who engage in tyrannical acts hate opposition,and psychological harassment allows the oppressor to penalize normal behaviors under given circumstances in order to aid in the further propagation of tyrannical acts while maiming the victim's ability for self-defense. Those who think that people have to be happy about being oppressed are the ones who are crazy.The fact is this, that if I really were a dangerous violent person these agencies would not dare to vex me, because they would be afraid of provoking me. The fact that they provoke me with their artificial situations and show their indifference with cynical ill-intentioned smiles shows that they know that I do not represent a danger to anyone.

With regard to my sons, I have already spoken on previous entries. My sons are sweet, lovable, friendly, and kind children who have suffered too much for their tender age, and who are being conditioned by Ana to exhibit certain behaviors which are then attributed to non-existent problems, when the only problem is the person who has them-Ana Dickenson. They do not need any "help" in anger/frustration/disappointment management (Ana needs help in this).
They need to be removed from a traumatic environment where they are not loved, to reverse the negative consequences which have arisen from being placed in such an environment in the first place, despite our protestations. It shows an astonishing inability to reason, and an uncanny ignorance of human nature to expect that a child should be happy in a place where they are not loved and are only viewed as a pawn in a vendetta.
I marvel that these people have the audacity to judge me when they are so lacking in basic common sense. Truly there is nothing so irrational as willful blindness, and these agencies have a chronic case of this self-imposed condition.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

I would love to see how all these people would behave in my shoes, if all the things which have been done to me were done to them. I am quite certain that they would not be nearly half as civil with anyone who oppressed them as I have been with them. Speaking of anger management, those who truly have need of it, are those who let their anger take such a hold of them that they obsessively seek to destroy other people's lives while driven by that very anger. This fits more Ana Dickenson, who has created this whole situation because of the irrational anger which she has, born out of delusions and imaginary wrongs which she thinks I and my sons have done to her ( examples: I made my husband abandon her, my sons took her place, we stole the attention which she only should have had from my husband, etc.), and driven by that anger which has consumed her whole corrupt being, she now has no greater pleasure that seeking to destroy my family, my marriage,
and worst of all my innocent children. Anyone who is SO angry that they have to resort to destroying the lives of small children to feel better, need more help in anger management (and fast!), than those who merely become upset at oppression and protest undeniable injustices. If these hypocritical agencies really want to help us, why don't they counsel Ana to stop being so obsessed with my husband, and to just live her life and let others live? Why don't they counsel her not to vent her carefully concealed feelings of frustration and hatred on innocent children who have not done anything to her?

Both of my sons have gotten slammed with fairy tale disorders which only exist in the desires of those who wish either to harm or to benefit monetarily from my sons' plight.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

What is happening to us is for real, and people in society should wake up and do something, because one tyrannical act serves as the precedent for future ones. All of us have power if we unite. I'm not going to let this injustice make me sit down and
waste away, while G-D gives me breath I am going to fight for my sons' sake against this injustice.

(some of the images seem to have come out too big for this entry, so click on the image to see it in its entirety)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The Struggle To Save A Video Documenting Our Struggle To Get To Our Sons' Daycare

Monday, April 4th 2011

As I explained in my March 31st-April 1st 2011 entry, I had tried going to my sons' daycare
with my husband when we had no car. This was on March 9th 2011. Our rights as parents have been savagely violated in what can only be honestly described as a Gestapo-like fashion, and its come to the point that we are now even prevented (due
to Ana's heavy behind-the scene influence) from providing for our sons, who are not being well cared for.

When I was about to log into this site I started having difficulties, and my internet signal was blocked and I was denied access to Buzznet for a while. This can be seen in the video below:

As a result of all this interference and my need to upload this new hacking evidence (which also gave me trouble), I was not able to log into my site against CPS abuse until now at almost six in the morning.

Ana's Hacker Friend Crashes My Browser While I Was Inspecting Newly Uploaded Video On April 4th At 4:48 AM

Because we have seen the boys in such poor shape on most of the visits, and because we are concerned about their health, we tried to go to
their daycare which had banned us from being able to go there and take healthful products for them (see March 2nd 2011 entry as well as March 31st/April 1st 2011 entry).

In other words what they are saying with their actions is the following:

" We won't take good care of them, but we won't let you help better their poor state either. You have no say in the lives of your own children."

These people do not love my children, they do not really care about them, my sons are only sources of income for them, and yet they get to make all the decisions about our sons, while we are just brushed to the side. They can try to sugar coat that sinister reality and make it seem otherwise, but their actions,and what has happened to our sons as well as to us speaks for itself.

The video above that I had to STRUGGLE so hard to save in Windows Movie Maker, and which documents the events of that day, shows the hardships that we went through trying to do something for our sons, but alas! not being able to achieve our goal. We lost a lot of time going to the daycare, for the following reasons:

1) When we were waiting at Kennedy Plaza in Downtown Providence, on our way to the daycare, one No. 20 bus which ran the Elmwood Ave/ Airport route was "Out Of Order", and another of the No. 20 buses all of a sudden was running a different route. Finally, when the No. 20 bus arrived which would take us there, a considerable amount of time had passed.

2) When the No. 20 bus left us at Post Road, we began to walk towards the daycare but were unable to finish the journey on foot, because of the very pedestrian un-friendly terrain. This place is made for cars not pedestrians.
We decided to try to wait for the No. 14 bus which we found out ran along that route, but it was getting late and the bus was not coming. We had left our house around 12 to 12:20 PM ,as my husband had worked half a day (otherwise we would have left earlier). However, because of all that we waited at Kennedy Plaza, a lot of time was lost. By the time we tried walking to the daycare, and then walked back at seeing that there was no sidewalk along the highway, even more time had gone by. The no. 14 bus did not come for a long time, and when we went into the Subway restaurant it came after we had waited around 30 minutes (it was cold outside). We decided that it was too late to try to go, something which a Subway worker who had children in that very daycare agreed with, as he said that the daycare closed at 5:30 PM.

Disheartened, but seeing the wisdom in returning, we walked over to the No. 20 Bus stop for the buses going back towards Elmwood Ave. When we got there it was almost 5 o'clock but not quite. We ended up waiting until after 7 o'clock , afterwards we had no choice but to walk to the airport in order to take the bus. Only one No. 20 bus had passed in all that time which said "Out Of Order". About three buses passed on the opposite side, a car with ill mannered rowdy youth who screamed at us "Ha!" from a window quickly passed us by,we watched the pedestrians crossing the street and the ongoing traffic, but no bus, save the "Out Of Order" one ever came. I know that the public transportation system here is appalling, but the most that a slow bus usually takes is 45 to 49 minutes, not over two hours! Also the No. 20 is more frequent than the slower buses.

During the time that we were waiting in the cold and my husband was complaining I called RIPTA twice to complain, and was told by a female customer service representative to call back the following day early in the morning (which I did).
A pedestrian who was walking by ( it was already after 7) told us that the bus does stop there, but since after a certain hour at night it no longer stops there that our best option would be to walk to the airport to take the bus, which we had to do, and that is how we got home.

I was worn out, as I had not slept working for my sons, and waiting over two hours in that cold weather, plus all the walking which I had done (while having had very little to eat that day) took a toll, though it was my husband who was most affected and complained of aching bones. We were at the correct bus stop, but the bus never came, so we had no choice but to go to another bus stop of that same line. I knew that this was not normal, so I decided to document it, in case I would ever need it to support my complaint to RIPTA (Rhode Island Transportation Authority).

The video which you see above documenting what we went through that day, cost me dearly to save, as the Windows Movie Maker Program went bonkers and refused to function normally for a good while (Ana's hacker friend again). Since I know that these situations are so bizarre that they might seem to defy credulity in some , I carefully documented that incident, and the evidence in screenshots can be seen at the link below:

Image Gallery: The Struggle To Save A 6 Minute 14 Second Video In Windows Movie Maker

Click on the videos to go to the video page and see other links. I will continue to fight against this injustice. Even now, as I was writing, this browser crashed once again.

Its 7:39 AM and Ana's hacker friend has crashed my browser multiple times while I have been working on this site. Every time I restore the browser I have to be checking that there is no sabotage to the text or to the layout of the site, since it takes a long time for the browser to come back. It really is becoming a nuisance, but one cannot expect anything different from disturbed, cowardly people who love to do harm, but are terrified of accountability.

The Report Refuting The Bogus Evaluations Done On Our Sons Is Finally Finished- Praise Be To G-D

Friday, April 29th 2011

Finished Report Refuting Biased Evaluations Done On Our Sons

I have not written any entries until now because I was busy finishing two reports.
First, I wrote a renewed request to have study sessions with our sons, which was sent to DCYF yesterday.
The link of this report can be found below:

Renewed Request For Study Session-Dated April 13th 2011 (click)

I also uploaded a recent video (shown below) which I really had to struggle to upload.

The below media documents the difficulties experienced.

The Struggle To Upload A Visit Video To My Moms41 YouTube Channel

Nevertheless the main reason for this entry is to put my refutation report on this site, as I feel that it can also help many parents who might have the misfortune of being victimized by these agencies.

This report has cost me SACRIFICE to finish. I had been working on it for months due to many difficulties which kept arising, and other reports which I had to write in defense of my sons.
Our car all of a sudden broke down, followed by an exceedingly harsh winter which made getting around difficult with the dismal public transportaion available here, and as documented on this site my computer has given me havoc.

I have also been doing other things such as designing educational board games for my sons (click here) ,
keeping sites regarding them updated, etc. Since its only I doing all these things under enormous stress, the delay in finishing this mammoth report is understandable.

If there might be any minor grammatical errors in the report (I do not think that this will be the case), please bear in mind that I write under great stress, and have to multi-task constantly in my efforts to
protect my sons from what is happening to them. I do many other things apart from writing reports.
I uploaded this 228 page report (which can perhaps also be considered a book) some time ago, and so far I am not seeing the preview, or the "read online" function appear on its designated page.

Document Uploaded Not Showing Preview Or Read Online Function On April 29th At 2:59 PM

The Report Can be found at the link below:

Link Provided Here Too -Click here To Go To Report

I will keep this entry as brief as possible, I will only state that yesterday, Thursday, I could not see my beloved boys because the visit supervisor and CASEY social worker Mt. Ehrhardt, said that he had to attend meetings, and that there was no one to supervise the visit, and so he rescheduled it for May 3rd. Last visit (April 14th) the things that we brought for the boys to promote their well being were not accepted, so we had to return home with them.

I continue in my lonely fight against this agency knowing that they have influence, connections, monetary resources, are capable of many illegal acts, and that they defend our main accuser Ana Dickenson fervently.

A Protest Against Ongoing Abuses Of Our Parental And Civil Rights To Safeguard Our Sons Well Being

Screenshot Of Letter Demanding Right To Buy Products

Friday, May 20th, 2011

I am writing this entry to speak briefly on two topics: 1) A recent letter which was sent yesterday protesting an unjust "policy" on the part of CASEY which has been discussed on this site in previous entries, and 2) the strange theft of my laptop which occurred on May 5th.

The "policy" discussed in the letter is the unlawful banning of our justified initiatives to purchase much needed healthy products for our sons, who at present are being neglected in their current foster home.The letter is rich in photographs which show the neglect, as well as explaining why this "policy" which
sprang up suddenly is unjust and detrimental to our sons' well being.

Below are photos showing when we sent the letter as well as a link to the letter ( which can be read online and also downloaded) Clink on the links for additional information about each picture:

Letter Sent To CASEY On May 19th- Pic 1

Letter Sent To CASEY On May 19th- Pic 3

Letter Sent To CASEY On May 19th- Pic 5

May 2011 Letter Written To CASEY & Affiliated Agencies Demanding The Right To Buy Healthy Products For Our Sons (click)

The Front Entrance Of The Olneyville Library Through Which The Thief Came And Took The Computer

With regard to the theft, all that I can say for now is this. I already have had for many days the text which I wrote describing the theft of my computer. However, the text had to be written by hand, and I still have not been able to type it because I no longer have a computer and time on Public library computers is very limited. Also I had to write the letter which can be read at the link above. The theft was highly suspicious and super quick (within two to three minutes). A valuable flash drive (memory stick) containing important evidence with regard to what is going on with my sons, was also stolen with the computer (it was inserted within the laptop at the time of the theft).

The reality is that those who would benefit the most from the sudden theft of my laptop are Ana and those who help her, as now the efficiency with which I can collect evidence and write reports exposing what is going on is seriously hindered, and we have been denied a real trial while being threatened that our kids ill be given up for adoption, and that Ana will decide who adopts them! Ana monitors all my sites, and I have proof of this which I can present in any court (if I ever get a real trial).

Now without a laptop, it will take more effort to get things done, but I'm up to the challenge for my sons' sake, and with G-D's help (Blessed be HIS HOLY NAME) I know that I will persevere.

A more recent link of the report which was written to refute the false evaluations done on our sons can be found at the link below, the report had minor errors on around four or five of it's 228 pages. The corrected version has an extra photo on page 28.

Refutations Of Biased Evaluations Done On Our Sons: Corrected Version (click)